FBI Director Comey says agency won’t recommend charges over Clinton email

originally posted by: Tempter

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Tempter

You can stop right there.

No, you can't.
You have to prove that she intended to transmit classified information to an unauthorized person.

Clicking SEND is intent. Why must this be so hard?

Especially when doing so from a non-secure server that never should have existed in the first place, which she owned, and upon which said classified information should not have ever been in the first place?

So to briefly recap: she sends classified information from a server that should have never existed in the first place, let alone one upon which classified information should never have been, to people without the proper clearance to receive said classified information.

And yet no crime was committed?

Really?!

Have we lost our collective minds?!?

a reply to: Stormdancer777

How many minds were changed when he reopened this?

originally posted by: digital01anarchy

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Tempter

You can stop right there.

No, you can't.
You have to prove that she intended to transmit classified information to an unauthorized person.

She sent classified information to her daughter! derp
What happened to you!

Also to Sydney Blumenthal.

originally posted by: Stormdancer777

originally posted by: Bloodydagger

originally posted by: Ohanka
convenient timing.

Not really.

Its a little too late. The damage has already been done here. Its way too late in the game for this to change the course for Tuesday night. Whatever happens, will happen Tuesday night.

Yes, I don't think this will change many minds.

Its not just that, millions have already voted with this email thing baked in. Not to mention, a lot of people out there don't fact check and take things at face value when its first reported. So regardless of this turn of events, you're going to have tons of people who think Hillary is a treasonous criminal still (which she is)

originally posted by: Phage

originally posted by: In4ormant

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: In4ormant

Involuntary manslaughter still comes with a sentence.

Yes. And there are laws which cover it.

In the case of this law, intent must be proven. But not in those because if there were intent it would be murder.

If I remeber correctly, the particular law in which she broke uses the word unwillingly in it.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Yeah I remembered it wrong. It was the gross negligence part I was thinking of.

That's a whole different argument and one that's been had before.

Some of us feel she exhibited gross negligence and others just said she was careless.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Stormdancer777

How many minds were changed when he reopened this?

I'd say quite a few independents and undecided moved to Trump. Some of them (maybe a lot) will move back to undecided now I think and some of those will go Clinton's way.

avoiding the "pardon me" awkwardness?

Comey had to back off because the Deep state can break your knees if you don’t play ball.

I use to think Comey was for Trump but maybe not; maybe he is just a deep state puppet and manipulated the Trumpites into a false narrative and he just lowered the boom.

Or if he wasn’t in on it and really was a Trump supporter then they probably paid him a visit and told him that his career was in jeopardy or something else

These powers that be play hard ball and if you don’t play along your career is finished or worst

I think I'll put a the bid for supplying her private presidential email server.

* Includes choice of cellular phone model.

a reply to: Tempter

That particular law is discussed here.


prospect.org...

a reply to: xuenchen

So, given that both Hillary and Comey have acknowledged the extremely careless nature of the private server setup of which Hillary regrets doing, when can the public expect the laws to be solidified so that it doesn't happen again?

I'm pretty sure the HOGR are going to want closure on this issue beyond Comeys latest announcement that everything is still just extremely careless without intent.

a reply to: Bloodydagger

Exactly. And to have the FBI talking about Hillary AGAIN today, does her no good. Clinton News Network isn't even happy. They're saying its too late, LOL. To the annoyance of Woof Blister, even their guests are continually bringing up the fact that the Clintons are still under criminal investigation...and will be for a long time.

(2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.



*Wouldn't being stored on a private email server be illegally placed somewhere instead of its "proper" place of custody?*

After Trump wins, third time is the charm...

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Stormdancer777

How many minds were changed when he reopened this?

The emails are still true, changing ones mind back would be foolish,

Removing processing from secured server equipment under government supervision to a private residence seems to fit gross negligence.

Some guy could have just broken in the building and carried it off. Simply careless? IDK...


edit:

This wasn't emails of LOL catz, it was sensitive US government correspondence.

a reply to: Annee

They did but that wasn't received well here.

originally posted by: Ahabstar
In other news, FBI will be doing a whole lot of hiring soon.

Hint: Moral ambiguity is the correct answer to the interview question on how others describe you. And The Constitution is an old sailing ship.

It might be an "old sailing ship" to those taught by our wonderful propaganda centers called our institutions of higher learning, but I can assure you, there are enough of us Constitutional loving Americans left to bring down hell on them if they so choose to take it to that level?

Think about how words send these special snowflakes to their safe place! What will bullets do to them?

a reply to: UKTruth

And after that there'll start child deportation for 2,000 each,?

Do we see obstruction of justice from the prosecutor point of view, Or much higher ?