It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Better question, WHY CAN'T YOU ACCEPT TRUMPS MESSAGE WON?
originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
a reply to: Tempter
I accept that he won. Now I'm watching what he's doing. And it's even worse than him winning.
WHY CAN'T YOU SEE HOW LAME HE IS AND HOW STUPID IT WAS TO VOTE FOR HIM?
originally posted by: Tempter
originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
a reply to: Tempter
I accept that he won. Now I'm watching what he's doing. And it's even worse than him winning.
WHY CAN'T YOU SEE HOW LAME HE IS AND HOW STUPID IT WAS TO VOTE FOR HIM?
Well, considering he's not POTUS yet I'll reserve my judgment until after his first two years.
Also, my stocks are soaring due to the "Trump Rally". How are yours doing?
originally posted by: Nikola014
This is ridiculous
originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
a reply to: Tempter
Better question, WHY CAN'T YOU ACCEPT TRUMPS MESSAGE WON?
I decided to take this one question and think it over and answer it.
I see full well that his "message" won. It won all of the most base and crass and tasteless and sycophantic and xenophobic and misogynist voters. It did. Indeed, it did. And you all are still giggling about it.
Bernie had the same message "Drain the swamp and throw the oligarchs out!". But he would have taken it beyond the 1% charade. He would have shunned all of the Wall Streeters and CEOs and moguls, and not given them even a whisper of a breath of attention.
He would have fought for all of us. He would have helped us save ourselves.
But no. You all wanted Mr Glitz. Mr Muscle. Mr "screw them!"
And now you are getting him (a rich guy) hiring a bunch of other rich guys, who do the same sort of pillaging and raping of the middle class that he does.
How are you OKAY WITH THAT MESSAGE?
I see full well that his "message" won. It won all of the most base and crass and tasteless and sycophantic and xenophobic and misogynist voters. It did. Indeed, it did. And you all are still giggling about it.
Play Vladimir Putin personally involved in US election hack, intelligence officials say Facebook Twitter Google Plus Embed
Vladimir Putin personally involved in US election hack, intelligence officials say 2:36
U.S. intelligence officials now believe with "a high level of confidence" that Russian President Vladimir Putin became personally involved in the covert Russian campaign to interfere in the U.S. presidential election, senior U.S. intelligence officials told NBC News.
Two senior officials with direct access to the information say new intelligence shows that Putin personally directed how hacked material from Democrats was leaked and otherwise used. The intelligence came from diplomatic sources and spies working for U.S. allies, the officials said.
Putin's objectives were multifaceted, a high-level intelligence source told NBC News. What began as a "vendetta" against Hillary Clinton morphed into an effort to show corruption in American politics and to "split off key American allies by creating the image that [other countries] couldn't depend on the U.S. to be a credible global leader anymore," the official said.
Play Tillerson is 'Gift for Putin,' Former Top Russian Minister Says Facebook Twitter Google Plus Embed
Tillerson is 'Gift for Putin,' Former Top Russian Minister Says 1:29
Ultimately, the CIA has assessed, the Russian government wanted to elect Donald Trump. The FBI and other agencies don't fully endorse that view, but few officials would dispute that the Russian operation was intended to harm Clinton's candidacy by leaking embarrassing emails about Democrats.
The latest intelligence said to show Putin's involvement goes much further than the information the U.S. was relying on in October, when all 17 intelligence agencies signed onto a statement attributing the Democratic National Committee hack to Russia.
The statement said officials believed that "only Russia's senior-most officials could have authorized these activities." That was an intelligence judgment based on an understanding of the Russian system of government, which Putin controls with absolute authority.
Now the U.S has solid information tying Putin to the operation, the intelligence officials say. Their use of the term "high confidence" implies that the intelligence is nearly incontrovertible.
Hawaii's Electors Join Effort to Get Intelligence Report on Russian Involvement
by PHIL HELSEL and THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Hawaii's four presidential electors have joined others in asking for more information about alleged Russian hacking of U.S. political institutions to sway the election before casting their ballots next week.
In a statement late Tuesday, the four Democratic electors asked President Barack Obama for the Central Intelligence Agency report into the cyber-attacks.
"The information contained in the report is essential to carrying out our constitutional obligation of casting our vote in an election that is free from tampering from outside entities," the statement said.
Why is that your favorite part?
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: BuzzyWigs
My favorite part:
Two senior officials with direct access to the information say
They aren't.
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: BuzzyWigs
Spies working for U.S. Allies you say? Sounds impressive and very 1940's no?
Could you tell me how a bunch of democratic electors in already claimed democratic states are going to change the electoral college?
There is a war going on Buzzy, of that I have zero doubt.
FBI Director James B. Comey and Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper Jr. have backed a CIA assessment that Russia intervened in the 2016 election in part to help Donald Trump win the presidency, according to U.S. officials.
Comey’s support for the CIA’s conclusion suggests that the leaders of the three agencies are in agreement on Russian intentions, contrary to suggestions by some lawmakers that the FBI disagreed with the CIA.
“Earlier this week, I met separately with (Director) FBI James Comey and DNI Jim Clapper, and there is strong consensus among us on the scope, nature, and intent of Russian interference in our presidential election,” CIA Director John Brennan said in a message to the agency’s workforce, according to U.S. officials who have seen the message.