The most damning child trafficking email yet

Aight so if this is the thread where we post weird findings, let's do it.

I've been reading about it for a few hours now and came up with some interesting stuff.

https://__._/podesta-emails/emailid/34860
''Susan whipped Sherry and me at Dominos. Using the Podesta method, she made up the rules as we played.''

https://__._/podesta-emails/emailid/28204
''Would love to get a pizza for an hour? Or come over''

https://__._/podesta-emails/emailid/37072
''Small gathering a few days before the pizza extravaganza''

https://__._/podesta-emails/emailid/19859
''Would you like to have a dinner at my places?!? >>> >>> Big or small. What do you think?''

https://__._/podesta-emails/emailid/30613
''I think you should give notice when changing strategies which have been > long in place....I am awaiting the > return of my children and grandchildren from their holiday travels so that we can demolish them.'' (??? Demolish cheese ? Not sure about this one, can't really be talking about demolishing the box because it's already been opened, he knows its cheese. I just find this weird. )

https://__._/podesta-emails/emailid/10037
Email with a picture pizza.jpg . It's 2 asians woman with a small kid eating pizza. The only comment from the email is, '' As John said, it doesn't get any better than this''

https://__._/podesta-emails/emailid/37465
''Meat and cheese!! Boy, do you both sure know the way to my heart! Thank you so much! Perfect timing. We're leaving for New Mexico tomorrow and we are having "breakfast for dinner" tonight...''

https://__._/podesta-emails/emailid/30231
''The next three months are going to be rougher internally than in Beijing. Between 7th and 1600, no fun. Hope you're doing ok. I'm dreaming about your hotdog stand in Hawaii...'' ??????????????


Make of it what you wish but it does raise some eyebrows...

originally posted by: DeadCat

originally posted by: tigertatzen

originally posted by: DeadCat
Someone aide me in the anxiety I am having right now. I can't... (CTRL + Scroll to zoom in if you can't read.)

Kat,
That handkerchief is my sketch for Level 5 of Castle Eisendorf.
Brock's rogue is trapped in a water-chamber and Hillary's sorcerer is almost out of spells and HP!
They're going to face a Glabrezu with 180 HP--I rolled!) and I doubt Mook's Paladin is up for it but if he can get back together with Sid's #ing munchkin'd Dragonborn Barbarian.

High drama--Can't wait! I've got a bunch of new WhizKids figurines that I've custom moded. Reapers. Red Skeletons. And Pit Fiends. Gonna have the room lit with sandalwood scented candles and a couple of vintage Lava-Simplex Lava Lamps for atmosphere! So I don't need the map, I've got a scan of it--but make sure the others don't get a look. I know Mook especially plays for *any* advantage he can get. Haha! I want to see them squirm! Oh, and don't worry about the pizza. I think we're ordering Chinese tonight. John "Killer DM" Pod

Is it possible they are really just playing D&D?? Like..

Is it possible they are really just playing D&D?? Like..

Why are you having anxiety?

Honestly just probably reading too much into things.

Or maybe it's because I think the entire world is ran by a pedo ring.. idk.

Well, it's certainly starting to seem that way, isn't it? Just keep in mind that this is all taken out of context...and likely put out there to get this very reaction from people, too.

originally posted by: tigertatzen

originally posted by: liveandlearn
a reply to: [post=21471049]DeadCat[/

Being from a family of incest...not me but further up the line and seeing the devastation and sometimes continued perversion to each individual, this kinda freaks me out. What exactly are they asking/saying.

It does seem be coded. Who asks that much for a beanie baby?

Well, to be fair, the "code" of it being three children and the asking price is just someone's interpretation of what was being said. The words actually say there are 480 of them...that's a lot of beanies, and depending on which ones they are, they can be pretty pricey. If you go by that one interpretation, yeah, it seems sinister...but we don't know for a fact that's what was being said here.

It's bizarre, but people are bizarre...and beanie baby people are very strange about their beanies, trust me on this. I'm not saying that it's not possible, but I think taking some random reddit user's interpretation as factual information is a mistake. It could be anything...or nothing at all.

www.urbandictionary.com...

It just get's worse..

a reply to: InS0MnI

Lots of references to pizza, yeah? That's weirder than the beanie babies, IMHO.

a reply to: DeadCat

:O:O:O

I was expecting the most damning evidence of child molestation to have some evidence of child molestation. You've got a self-confessed X-files nerd talking about D&D, and some extremely lame person talking about Beanie Babies. I would ask if I missed it but I'm sure I didn't and you all have spent way too long in front of your computer screens.

That being said, if you can come up with some valid law enforcement sites (not a place that is going to retroactively decide it's code for child abuse) that have references for the words used in these posts as being code for child abuse, I'll listen.

originally posted by: TheFlyOnTheWall
a reply to: audubon

That takes this into a whole other twist. The original post was over a year ago which means, this wikileak was never actually hacked.

Well, it's certainly a bit of a funny coincidence. It might have been leaked by one of the recipients and *then* hacked later on as well. Stranger things have happened.

The other coincidence this throws up is that 480 is the number of Billionaire beanie babies that Ty Warner autographed for employees during each of two consecutive years.

Given to Ty Employees:
Billionaire bear Beanie Babies in 1998 (Undisclosed number)
475 Billionaire 2 Beanie Babies in 1999
650 Billionaire 3 Beanie Babies in 2000
762 Billionaire 4 Beanie Babiesin 2001
769 Billionaire 5 Beanie Babies in 2002
696 Billionaire 6 Beanie Babies in 2003
612 Billionaire 7 Beanie Babies in 2004
480 Billionaire 8 Beanie Babies in 2005
480 Billionaire 9 Beanie Babies in 2006
457 Billionaire 10 Beanie Babies in 2007
469 Billionaire 11 Beanie Babies in 2008
357 Billionaire 12 Beanie Babies in 2009
611 Billionaire 13 Beanie Babies in 2010

Source: smartcollecting.com...

So it strikes me that the beanie babies email might be code for something a bit different to child abduction.

If the 480 is a pre-arranged code for 'billionaires' then there's an obvious connection to the fund-raising aspect of the email. Soliciting large sums from wealthy backers? The 'visiting parents' then would be a codename for superiors - perhaps even Bill 'n' Hill themselves.

So the next questions are: Did the Clintons visit Georgetown shortly after this email was sent; and did any billionaires donate to them at around that time, and if so, how much?

originally posted by: DeadCat

originally posted by: tigertatzen

originally posted by: liveandlearn
a reply to: [post=21471049]DeadCat[/

Being from a family of incest...not me but further up the line and seeing the devastation and sometimes continued perversion to each individual, this kinda freaks me out. What exactly are they asking/saying.

It does seem be coded. Who asks that much for a beanie baby?

Well, to be fair, the "code" of it being three children and the asking price is just someone's interpretation of what was being said. The words actually say there are 480 of them...that's a lot of beanies, and depending on which ones they are, they can be pretty pricey. If you go by that one interpretation, yeah, it seems sinister...but we don't know for a fact that's what was being said here.

It's bizarre, but people are bizarre...and beanie baby people are very strange about their beanies, trust me on this. I'm not saying that it's not possible, but I think taking some random reddit user's interpretation as factual information is a mistake. It could be anything...or nothing at all.

www.urbandictionary.com...

It just get's worse..

Hahahaaaa that's actually pretty freaking hilarious to me, for personal reasons. Never heard that one before, but I'll be using it.

However, from the standpoint of the current situation, that interpretation is indeed very disturbing. It would be more disturbing if it was a reference to Hispanic children, but it's still weird enough as it is.

a reply to: TheFlyOnTheWall

What I have noted, above all else, is that a lot of people seem very overly fixated on making every email out of be some pedophile coded message. I'd be curious to know how the people that came up with these "secret codes" did so. Apparently they spend all day looking for coded pedophile messages. Pretty damn messed up.

This is all BS until something legit comes up.

originally posted by: InS0MnI
Aight so if this is the thread where we post weird findings, let's do it.

I've been reading about it for a few hours now and came up with some interesting stuff.

https://__._/podesta-emails/emailid/34860
''Susan whipped Sherry and me at Dominos. Using the Podesta method, she made up the rules as we played.''

https://__._/podesta-emails/emailid/28204
''Would love to get a pizza for an hour? Or come over''

https://__._/podesta-emails/emailid/37072
''Small gathering a few days before the pizza extravaganza''

https://__._/podesta-emails/emailid/19859
''Would you like to have a dinner at my places?!? >>> >>> Big or small. What do you think?''

https://__._/podesta-emails/emailid/30613
''I think you should give notice when changing strategies which have been > long in place....I am awaiting the > return of my children and grandchildren from their holiday travels so that we can demolish them.'' (??? Demolish cheese ? Not sure about this one, can't really be talking about demolishing the box because it's already been opened, he knows its cheese. I just find this weird. )

https://__._/podesta-emails/emailid/10037
Email with a picture pizza.jpg . It's 2 asians woman with a small kid eating pizza. The only comment from the email is, '' As John said, it doesn't get any better than this''

https://__._/podesta-emails/emailid/37465
''Meat and cheese!! Boy, do you both sure know the way to my heart! Thank you so much! Perfect timing. We're leaving for New Mexico tomorrow and we are having "breakfast for dinner" tonight...''

https://__._/podesta-emails/emailid/30231
''The next three months are going to be rougher internally than in Beijing. Between 7th and 1600, no fun. Hope you're doing ok. I'm dreaming about your hotdog stand in Hawaii...'' ??????????????


Make of it what you wish but it does raise some eyebrows...

These are sick #s, and it's abundantly apparent, in my opinion...

originally posted by: audubon

originally posted by: TheFlyOnTheWall
a reply to: audubon

That takes this into a whole other twist. The original post was over a year ago which means, this wikileak was never actually hacked.

Well, it's certainly a bit of a funny coincidence. It might have been leaked by one of the recipients and *then* hacked later on as well. Stranger things have happened.

The other coincidence this throws up is that 480 is the number of Billionaire beanie babies that Ty Warner autographed for employees during each of two consecutive years.

Given to Ty Employees:
Billionaire bear Beanie Babies in 1998 (Undisclosed number)
475 Billionaire 2 Beanie Babies in 1999
650 Billionaire 3 Beanie Babies in 2000
762 Billionaire 4 Beanie Babiesin 2001
769 Billionaire 5 Beanie Babies in 2002
696 Billionaire 6 Beanie Babies in 2003
612 Billionaire 7 Beanie Babies in 2004
480 Billionaire 8 Beanie Babies in 2005
480 Billionaire 9 Beanie Babies in 2006
457 Billionaire 10 Beanie Babies in 2007
469 Billionaire 11 Beanie Babies in 2008
357 Billionaire 12 Beanie Babies in 2009
611 Billionaire 13 Beanie Babies in 2010

Source: smartcollecting.com...

So it strikes me that the beanie babies email might be code for something a bit different to child abduction.

If the 480 is a pre-arranged code for 'billionaires' then there's an obvious connection to the fund-raising aspect of the email. Soliciting large sums from wealthy backers? The 'visiting parents' then would be a codename for superiors - perhaps even Bill 'n' Hill themselves.

So the next questions are: Did the Clintons visit Georgetown shortly after this email was sent; and did any billionaires donate to them at around that time, and if so, how much?

Now that sounds far more plausible than child trafficking for the beanie baby thing. But why say they don't want the "parents" to find out?

Gaaaaa. It's the cat and dog friendly line that weirds me out. Now I understand that if they are truely only stuffed animals then pets would be a concern. But the tone of the email is the worst. But the tone is only horrible in my mind because I don't trust anyone. It is not unreasonable to ask 20 bucks for a beanie baby but it's odd to sell them as a group only and give the one piece price only and not the sum total 9,600 dollars worth of cotton. That's 10 grand fir beanie babies.

a reply to: tigertatzen

But why say they don't want the "parents" to find out?

Deniability, for whatever reason. So that the beneficiaries of the fundraising can honestly say they know nothing about the source of the money. That's what a good underling would do - cover their boss's ass.

That would be my reading of the situation anyway. It's the simplest interpretation.

originally posted by: TheAlleghenyGentleman
Gaaaaa. It's the cat and dog friendly line that weirds me out. Now I understand that if they are truely only stuffed animals then pets would be a concern. But the tone of the email is the worst. But the tone is only horrible in my mind because I don't trust anyone. It is not unreasonable to ask 20 bucks for a beanie baby but it's odd to sell them as a group only and give the one piece price only and not the sum total 9,600 dollars worth of cotton. That's 10 grand fir beanie babies.

The mental context presented of these email don't help at all..

I still cannot decipher the D&D game..

a reply to: Ksihkehe

I've posted this in a couple of other threads, probably should have made my own thread but I'm too lazy.
Alex Jones has a guest who goes into some detail, including an image from Podesta emails.

originally posted by: tigertatzen

Now that sounds far more plausible than child trafficking for the beanie baby thing. But why say they don't want the "parents" to find out?

The child porn case I am trying to recall from 40 years ago included coded messages where "the parents" stood for FBI.

The world is far darker than most of us ever want to imagine.

originally posted by: Ksihkehe
a reply to: TheFlyOnTheWall

What I have noted, above all else, is that a lot of people seem very overly fixated on making every email out of be some pedophile coded message. I'd be curious to know how the people that came up with these "secret codes" did so. Apparently they spend all day looking for coded pedophile messages. Pretty damn messed up.

This is all BS until something legit comes up.

Isn't that called "Psychological Projection"?

Psychological projection is a theory in psychology in which humans defend themselves against their own unconscious impulses or qualities (both positive and negative) by denying their existence in themselves while attributing them to others

en.wikipedia.org...

originally posted by: audubon
a reply to: tigertatzen

But why say they don't want the "parents" to find out?

Deniability, for whatever reason. So that the beneficiaries of the fundraising can honestly say they know nothing about the source of the money. That's what a good underling would do - cover their boss's ass.

That would be my reading of the situation anyway. It's the simplest interpretation.

Well that makes sense to me...I'm guessing the cat and dog friendly line was probably some inside joke thrown in there. I think you're on the right track if this is actually some kind of coded message. The pizza references are probably another joke or nickname for something too.

I remember recently reading about a murder case involving people called in their community as "furries" or Furry fandom" which by some accounts has taken a sexual turn in recent years. This influenced my thoughts here.

Would child abuse victims be made to wear "fantasy" fetish type costumes? Would "costuming" children be done in a ritual abuse type setting to ensure anonymity, even among the abused? I have no idea. I've read much throughout my life on some of this stuff but never saw any reference to that type of practice (repeated) and have never heard nor seen a sexual abuse victim state anything like that. Seems to make sense in terms of if adults do it for fun why wouldn't it be done with kids. Makes me wonder if there is a Beanie Baby costume thing.

The idea would maybe explain why the strange references and seemingly unrelated words being used to categorize victims and possibly, victims "character". Sounds weird but then again the whole thing is weird.

a reply to: DeadCat


That seems less child sex ring and more about raising funds and possibly molding new "talent" to help exploit the political system. It's super odd too don't get me wrong. Now crazy as it seems he really could just be talking dinner in this message. But goddamn if these people don't just eat junk constantly. Michele Obama would have a fit........