It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
“I believe – I know, and this is from a very well-placed source of mine at 1PP, One Police Plaza in New York – the NYPD wanted to do a press conference announcing the warrants and the additional arrests they were making in this investigation, and they’ve gotten huge pushback, to the point of coercion, from the Justice Department, with the Justice Department threatening to charge someone that had been unrelated in the accidental heart attack death of Eric Garner almost two years ago. That’s the level of pushback the Obama Justice Department is doing against actually seeking justice in the email and other related criminal matters,” Prince said.
originally posted by: Denoli
What if the FBI are donating to the wikileaks foundation ?
In return for pre wikileaks leaks ?
Wtf 👍
originally posted by: superman2012
If it is true, and Hillary gets arrested, what would this mean for the elections? Would they get delayed?
originally posted by: interupt42
a reply to: Vortiki
3. Politics.
All BS to tarnish the evil witch on a last minute push to push voters to the evil orange.
If you haven't seen how evil the witch is by now their is no hope no matter how many of these last minute arrest rumors are spread.
4. Get Stay at home voters and independents leaning towards trump to go and vote (More likely )
All BS to tarnish the evil witch on a last minute push to get stay at home voters out to vote for the evil orange.
Ofcourse this is ignoring the fact that your vote doesnt really matter.
The Constitution is clear about the necessary qualifications for this position: the president must be above the age of thirty-five, have lived in the United States for at least fourteen years, and be a “natural-born citizen.” Placing further restrictions on the office cannot be done without passing a Constitutional amendment — a change I’ve never heard anyone even suggest.
It’s fascinating that the drafters of our Constitution put more emphasis on a person’s birthplace than on that person’s actions — but then, they were politicians too. Maybe their choice not to require our nation’s leader to be strictly law-abiding was not an oversight, but rather, a deliberate omission by those who understood the use of criminal prosecution as a political tool.
Link