BREAKING: Clinton Email Case Just Reopened!

a reply to: SudoNim

a reply to: Annee


No Proof!? You've got to be kidding, right!?

From the Hillary Campaign leaked emails we already had the fallout of Debbie Wasserman Schulz and 4 others at the DNC being let go or forced to leave due to shady practices. Donna Brazille, who leaked debate questions to Hillary, got fired from CNN. Veritas videos revealed the corrupt and violent practices of subcontractor to the DNC, Bob Creamer, who was fired from the contract over the revelations of birddogging for Hillary. Podesta and his best friend at the DOJ derailing the look into Hillarys emails (see correspondence proof below). Shall I go on or do you have enough evidence now? Plenty of evidence. Plenty of it. Not sure where you've been to miss the highlights I've just covered. Plenty of evidence, unless of course, you intend to ignore cold hard facts.



DOJ's Peter Kadzik Exposed Colluding With Clinton Campaign

More Collusion With Donna Brazile Revealed As Hillary Campaign Sought Advice On Prepared Debate Answers


Top DNC staffers out following email scandal

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: Xcathdra

Hillary Clinton is not being charged with treason, and her "negligence" didn't result in anything near treason.

"Treason against the United States shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open Court.
18 U.S. Code § 2381 - Treason

I want you to read that back to yourself at least 3 times. "Adhering to your enemies". Soooo, if a foreign government paid Hilary a lot of money to favor them with a generous weapons deal, all the while financing and supporting our enemy (ISIS) who uses that armament to attack thise we "claim" we are protecting is not considered treason.?

Please explain that like I'm a two year old because I simply fail to understand.

Possible Espionage Act violation

Section 793 of the Penal Code, Subsection (f), because this is what Hillary Clinton – among other things, but this in particular – is what Hillary Clinton has to worry about.

“Here’s the law: ‘Whoever being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note or information relating to the national defense …”

"By the way, this is part of what’s called the Espionage Act.

“Subset one: ‘... through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust or to be lost, stolen, abstracted or destroyed ...’

“Got that? I’ll get to the next section later. I’m hearing on TV: ‘It depends on her intent, it depends on her intent.’ No it doesn’t, not with respect to this, Subsection (f).

Or two, “… having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust or lost or stolen or abstracted…”

Article and audio at link

www.cnsnews.com...

That quote on treason was follow (if it came from wiki) by

However, Congress has passed laws creating related offenses that punish conduct that undermines the government or the national security, such as sedition in the 1798 Alien and Sedition Acts, or espionage and sedition in the 1917 Espionage Act, which do not require the testimony of two witnesses and have a much broader definition than Article Three treason. Some of these laws are still in effect. Some well-known spies have been convicted of espionage rather than treason.

There could well be some serious consequences to the action.

a reply to: Rosinitiate

Please explain that like I'm a two year old because I simply fail to understand.

Please explain to me, like I'm a two year, why you think the FBI is investigating Hillary Clinton for deals negotiated on behalf of the USA while executing her job as Secretary of State?

a reply to: roadgravel

Dream on. Hope springs eternal!

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: roadgravel

Dream on. Hope springs eternal!

I'm just pointing out the laws that may apply given previous conversation.

Seems almost every government related person breaking the rules gets pardoned down he road. it's not up to me to make the decision on any of it.

a reply to: roadgravel

Hillary is not being investigated for or charged with treason.

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: roadgravel

Hillary is not being investigated for or charged with treason.

And I didn't state that she was. It will be up to the government to decide if any laws were broken and, if so, which.

Some of her actions appear to be in violation of the Espionage Act but, as before, others will decide.

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: roadgravel

Hillary is not being investigated for or charged with treason.

No, not yet that we know of.

But the investigation of the Weiner-grams just started.

Who knows what will come as a result of that?

Nothing would surprise me at this point.

This is an amazing time. History is being made and we are only privy to the tiniest tip of this iceberg. But the pace that it's moving is almost beyond belief.

Weiner-grams

LOL, major.

FYI: If a knock at the door is heard, don't open it.

Gregg Jarrett: An "avalanche of evidence" may now bury Hillary

Would Clinton presidency be engulfed, disabled by scandals?

Americans who lived through the nightmares of both the Watergate and Lewinsky scandals recall vividly how every day seemed to produce new evidence of wrongdoing. The drip, drip of deceptions and lies finally overflowed into a cascading pool of criminality and disgust.

The first scandal culminated in Articles of Impeachment. The other an impeachment trial. Is America now hurtling toward the same political abyss? It looks like it. So, fasten your seat belts and brace for impact.

Click link for full article...

IMPORTANT: Using Content From Other Websites on ATS
MOD NOTE: Posting work written by others

originally posted by: Xcathdra
Gregg Jarrett: An "avalanche of evidence" may now bury Hillary

evidence" may now bury Hillary
Gregg Jarrett

By Gregg Jarrett Published November 03, 2016 FoxNews.com
Facebook Twitter livefyre Email Print

Now Playing

Would Clinton presidency be engulfed, disabled by scandals?

Americans who lived through the nightmares of both the Watergate and Lewinsky scandals recall vividly how every day seemed to produce new evidence of wrongdoing. The drip, drip of deceptions and lies finally overflowed into a cascading pool of criminality and disgust.

The first scandal culminated in Articles of Impeachment. The other an impeachment trial. Is America now hurtling toward the same political abyss? It looks like it. So, fasten your seat belts and brace for impact.

Sources tell Fox News’s Bret Baier that the FBI has uncovered an “avalanche of evidence” in the Clinton Foundation investigation.

Agents are “actively and aggressively pursuing this case,” calling it a “very high priority.”

Armed with newly discovered email evidence and additional documents revealed by WikiLeaks, these sources say that agents will likely try to get Huma Abedin and others to cooperate in an effort to bring criminal charges against Hillary Clinton.

It is a stunning development. But that’s how avalanches happen. Suddenly, you’re buried before you know it.

Click link for full article...

I'm not sure if Bret Baier is saying that he heard wrong. Hillary isn't close to being buried by the evidence after all?

BRET BAIER SAYS:

BRET BAIER: I want to be clear -- I want to be clear about this, and this was -- came from a Q and A that I did with Brit Hume after my show and after we went through everything. He asked me if, after the election, if Hillary Clinton wins, will this investigation continue, and I said, “yes absolutely.” I pressed the sources again and again what would happen. I got to the end of that and said, “they have a lot of evidence that would, likely lead to an indictment.” But that’s not, that’s inartfully answered. That’s not the process. That’s not how you do it. You have to have a prosecutor. If they don't move forward with a prosecutor with the DOJ, there would be, I'm told, a very public call for an independent prosecutor to move forward. There is confidence in the evidence, but for me to phrase it like I did, of course that got picked up everywhere, but the process is different than that.

Source: www.mediamatters.org...

a reply to: carewemust

Probably the most important part of the article is this.

Time For an Independent Counsel Given these reports of DOJ’s interference, there are serious and legitimate doubts about the integrity of the government’s ability to investigation Clinton. Attorney General Loretta Lynch was compromised from the beginning. She was first elevated to the position of U.S. Attorney by Bill Clinton. She met privately with him just days before a decision was made as to whether his wife would be prosecuted. As if that were not enough, Lynch’s boss, President Obama, defended Clinton publicly last April on "Fox News Sunday" by declaring, in essence, she did not break the law. He made the same argument during an earlier “60 Minutes” interview. He prejudged the outcome of the case. This sent a pretty clear message to those in charge of just how the president wanted the question of prosecution to turn out. Now, it appears that Lynch’s Department is heeding that message by actively obstructing the FBI’s investigation. The attorney general has failed or refused to appoint a Special Prosecutor to ensure that these investigations are fair and impartial. President Obama could demand one, as well. He likely will not. His conflict of interest is as glaring as Lynch’s. After all, the president has been campaigning vigorously for Clinton to succeed him. Why would he now jeopardize the chance of preserving or even burnishing his legacy? Donald Trump is vowing, if elected, to unwind much of what Mr. Obama has accomplished. Therefore, it is up to Congress to reauthorize the Independent Counsel Act to accomplish the same. It would direct the attorney general to petition the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit to appoint one. No choice. Sadly, this may be the only way the public’s trust can be restored.

a reply to: carewemust

ATS thread by ghostrager - BREAKING: Comey Mandates All FBI Agents Report to D.C. Offices; Prep for Raids, Possible Arrests in Clinton Probes

I guess we might be close to finding out.

You keep saying plenty of evidence and then jumping to proof.

Do you understand the difference between those two words?

Tell me in your own words what you think this is proof of.

a reply to: thepixelpusher

More proof.

Assange shows the email and connection between Clinton and ISIS with Saudi govt. funding.

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
More proof.

Assange shows the email and connection between Clinton and ISIS with Saudi govt. funding.

Seriously Google the two words or ask your dad to explain the differences between proof, evidence, fact and opinion. Thanks

Who hasn't been inside Hillarys private email server? Sounds more well traveled than Bill Clinton to Lolita Island.

Hacker Guccifer 2.0 Warns He Has "Info From Inside FEC: Democrats May Rig The Elections"

a reply to: thepixelpusher

Ask for a paper ballot when you go to vote.