Hillary Clinton CTR (Correct the Record) Digital Disruption Strategy final weeks exposed?

a reply to: Vasa Croe

The little joke graphics you posted don't look "bad" for this lefty in any way. I could care less about CTR, CRT, or ETC.

I wasn't directing the "critical thought" at you so much, since you ask so nicely ... but rather the Greek chorus that always seem to chime in on stuff like this.

If you think that the Trump organization doesn't have folks "correcting the record" in his favor in the same way that there have been right-wing and alt-right internet operatives FOR YEARS ... you're just living in fantasy land.

What I find absurd here lately is the absolute projection of alt-right Trump supporters what they do is what they see everyone else doing. Classic case.

So, carry on.

All this doesn't even matter. People will still blindly support the corruption, lies and poli-ticks because of all the idiocracy surrounding her campaign is just normal to them. The truth is right in front of HRC supporters faces and they deny it. They deny it's existence, even refuting the sources or rebutting the claims. Trump is not that great, but he is a better choice over this type of control tactics and impairment of the public knowledge. I am appalled at the mockery of the Republic shown these past few months.

Well said.

Not just the mockery of it though...truly...the death throws of it. After November, we are a Republic in name only.

a reply to: Vasa Croe

They are everywhere. They are blanketing ATS as well. They are the worst on Twitter, the thing is they are so bad at their "jobs" that they are so incredibly easy to spot. I get blocked by CTR shills all the time.

a reply to: Vasa Croe

Wow its like 90% of whats been reducing quality content on ATS and making people argue for months.

Because if your candidate is a liar, corrupt and a horrible person this is the way to go....

I thought the comments about mods was funny. Not saying that is the case here, but other sites sure. I bet they had their private lives compromised so a bunch of Hillary trolls can post garbage and harass members /posters.

I love it. Shows their mentality and the leadership they follow.

originally posted by: Vasa Croe
So this is making the rounds on Twitter and it appears to have a lot of the content we are seeing online right now already laid out from the beginning of this month. It also appears it correctly captures the feel of each particular medium it is talking about....even appears to apply to a lot of threads here. Anywho...here it is and a link to download if you'd like.

.....

I am unsure if there is any way to actually validate this document, but apparently CTR is mum on it. Would love to see if anyone can find this anywhere else and if it can be validated. There are some posters on ATS that seem to have taken a page directly from this in their posts....

If real, it's the stupidest game plan anyone came up with.

For example, the "Cheeto Jesus" is going to alienate every person of color out there. Seems unlikely to be a plan put out by anyone with minorities on their staff.

For example: "Day 0 meme" is a bad photoshop job, and a poor source for starting an argument. It's merely tacky. More effective would be Elizabeth Warren quote with Warren.

For example: The "cheeto Jesus" bit bullet point calls Blacks "negros." Who the heck calls Blacks by THAT name in THIS age??

Ridiculous choice of targets - she's been more effective with Putin, tax-dodging, and lack of plans.

Complete lack of awareness - yes, we post liberal news items on Facebook (when those don't chase friends off) and share... but this is hardly new or novel.

And there's the incredibly lame "SJW doxxers"... not many social justice warriors have any sort of high level computer skills.

If that's really a Clinton analyst, I'm going to send her MY resume because I could come up with a better game plan than that inept, ill-informed mess.

Interesting!

What, no ATS section?!

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
Interesting!

What, no ATS section?!

perhaps that's why those new users (one and the same user?) seem so unhinged. either it's the weight of that story with DHS or whatever taking over the election and wikileaks being compromised, or they just went bananas without clear orders from their beloved witch.

originally posted by: havok
All this doesn't even matter.

People will still blindly support the corruption, lies and poli-ticks because of all the idiocracy surrounding her campaign is just normal to them.

The truth is right in front of HRC supporters faces and they deny it.
They deny it's existence, even refuting the sources or rebutting the claims.

Trump is not that great, but he is a better choice over this type of control tactics and impairment of the public knowledge.

I am appalled at the mockery of the Republic shown these past few months.

I disagree, this has set the stage so to speak, of a whole different kind of realization about to come on the scene, this has NOT been a wasted election at all.

a reply to: Byrd

The documents read like a alt-righter's dream of what a CTR document would look like ... because that's what it is.

The terminology isn't correct for one thing for "a liberal slant."

The humor is blunt and sophomoric (not elitist and "highbrow") etc.

It just doesn't pass (and I can't believe I'm using this term) the "smell test" for anyone that doesn't already believe all this garbage (i.e. alt-righters.)

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Byrd

The documents read like a alt-righter's dream of what a CTR document would look like ... because that's what it is.

The terminology isn't correct for one thing for "a liberal slant."

The humor is blunt and sophomoric (not elitist and "highbrow") etc.

It just doesn't pass (and I can't believe I'm using this term) the "smell test" for anyone that doesn't already believe all this garbage (i.e. alt-righters.)

Here's a classic example of denial/cover & distract listed on page 3.

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Byrd

The documents read like a alt-righter's dream of what a CTR document would look like ... because that's what it is.

I agree with you. The memes and suggestions would simply fall flat in the presumed arenas.

The terminology isn't correct for one thing for "a liberal slant."

The humor is blunt and sophomoric (not elitist and "highbrow") etc.

It just doesn't pass (and I can't believe I'm using this term) the "smell test" for anyone that doesn't already believe all this garbage (i.e. alt-righters.)

I wouldn't say so much as an alt-righter but most certainly a hoaxer who's not familiar with typical liberal action networks (like the one for the Dakota Pipeline Protest Support) and who's completely unaware of the material being passed around by Clinton and her supporters on Facebook and Twitter. In fact, Clinton's Facebook page right now has a nice photo of her with Elizabeth Warren and the caption "Get this Donald: Nasty women are tough. Nasty women are smart. And nasty women vote." —Elizabeth Warren IWillVote.com" - already shared close to a thousand times.

So they're ignoring this inept advice (which they never got and which wasn't considered in the first place.) Looking at their current actions, they're focusing on sending links to news stories from multiple sources (including conservative sources), personal stories, and with memes about "get out and vote!"

...in other words, smart moves that do appeal to liberals and SJWs.

originally posted by: Majorsetback

Here's a classic example of denial/cover & distract listed on page 3.

Gryphon is correct. Ask any liberal here on ATS and they'll say the same - that this material would fall completely flat. Clinton's campaign has been fairly good with Twitter et al; they get lots of retweets and they have influential people reposting their memes (which means a huge spread.)

The lame stuff on the hoax page would get liberals backing away from her and asking what the heck was wrong with her.

a reply to: Byrd

kind of like the duck thing?

EDIT TO ADD:
I have seen this exact crap even here.

Its not a stretch. What is wishful thinking at this point is that this is somehow below hardline democrats.

The party is currently led by radicals. They have ruined so many things that they dont get a pass. This is BS and everyone should be pissed at them for it.

Enough is enough.

Take back your party people.

Republicans need to form a new party. Their party is a complete loss.

Democrats are too enthusiastic and forgiving for dangerous people and tactics.

This is not a right wing lie. Its absurd to imply that. We could have listed it from first hand experience with different names.

This is part of the problem. A propaganda entity devoted to a career politician too dirty to clean up.

originally posted by: Byrd

The lame stuff on the hoax page would get liberals backing away from her and asking what the heck was wrong with her.

Exactly.

This is stuff attractive to the right-wing mindset, not the left or center ... as well as the terminology.

originally posted by: ColaTesla
The thing about CTR is they are changing NO ONES mind, They're easy to spot, Like that silly poster on here, All they achieve is to evoke a sense of disgust towards themselves. A waste of effort if you ask me....

I mean, Has anyone, Ever at any time, Been swayed or changed their mind because of a CTR post???

No-one asked you, luckily, since your opinion is ill-informed and misguided.

Asking in one thread if people have been swayed by a CTR post, considering most people don't know who/if anyone is CTR while also stating that "NO ONES" mind has been changed. How exactly did you arrive at the conclusion?

Maybe just maybe, the people who are CTR aren't targeting people like you, educationally lost causes, and are more about spamming their information/opinions to those who ARE on the fence.