Hillary Clinton CTR (Correct the Record) Digital Disruption Strategy final weeks exposed?

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: iTruthSeeker

Who believe in conspiracy theories.
Who have low understanding and a limited vocabulary and questionable spelling and grammar skills.

Interesting that you happen to be posting on probably the largest conspiracy forum in the world.

The vocabulary and grammar are pretty much on part with a slide deck....typically shorthand like a tweet. It isn't like they were writing a document for the court. The people they seem to be going after in it are likely very similar to the ones that would be using it....unless you are suggesting that Republicans are ALL conspiracy nuts who aren't well educated?

a reply to: introvert

the lies are running rampant in the hillary campaign in general and as I said there is nothing they wouldn't do forget laws and regulations. But they do usually use good grammar and punctuation so maybe this time they didn't do it

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Vasa Croe

How far did you get in that research? Have you located the source yet?

Only what I posted, but from your last post it seems you didn't bother to read the entire thread so....

originally posted by: keenmachine
a reply to: introvert

the lies are running rampant in the hillary campaign in general and as I said there is nothing they wouldn't do forget laws and regulations. But they do usually use good grammar and punctuation so maybe this time they didn't do it

I can guarantee they didn't do this. This is the creation of a Right Wing hoaxer.

a reply to: Vasa Croe

No I haven't yet. Sorry I'm not Evelyn Wood.

I asked the above from your post on page one.


Who is researching it then? If not you.
Oh and look up a post or two where I actually say I don't know if the source has been discovered yet but hoped it was within the four pages I still had not yet read.

Simmer down .

originally posted by: DAVID64
a reply to: Gryphon66

Seriously, you can bitch about "critical thinking" and still think Hillary is a good candidate?

Quite easily actually.

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: havok
All this doesn't even matter.

People will still blindly support the corruption, lies and poli-ticks because of all the idiocracy surrounding her campaign is just normal to them.

The truth is right in front of HRC supporters faces and they deny it.
They deny it's existence, even refuting the sources or rebutting the claims.

Trump is not that great, but he is a better choice over this type of control tactics and impairment of the public knowledge.

I am appalled at the mockery of the Republic shown these past few months.

Many people think Trump is the idiocracy.

In regard to CTR it is some type of PAC and that is what they do. I would assume there is a pro Trump PAC that does the same thing.

Really do you have a link? or just am assumption?

New Project Veritas video going up soon. TACTICAL NUKE INCOMING!

a reply to: DAVID64

Ha ha. Proud of the accomplishments of the Clinton foundation.
Emails that reveal nothing.
Keep trying.

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: beeeyotch
a reply to: reldra ok when you find it let us know, until then you are just speculating.

When I find what?

The Google search away super PAC for Trump. I guess they don't believe he has one. Which is odd. A super PAC is a good thing for a campaign. They can take bigger contributions and they produce their own ads for a candidate.

www.greatamericapac.com...

BTW these guys published the credit card numbers of some donors in a federal filing.

How about this little tidbit


Drip Drip

a reply to: Konduit

Trump dominates the headlines with threats of sueing his accusers. Sex is always going to dominate the news cycle. He should A) stay quiet and B) get info about the emails and focus on that and C) prey.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Vasa Croe

No I haven't yet. Sorry I'm not Evelyn Wood.

I asked the above from your post on page one.


Who is researching it then? If not you.
Oh and look up a post or two where I actually say I don't know if the source has been discovered yet but hoped it was within the four pages I still had not yet read.

Simmer down .

Like I referenced in my reply to you...read the thread and you'll find where it originated. If you're going to trounce on folks on conspiracy boards and make them out to be idiots, you may want to actually read a whole thread before you post....sorry I didn't include the Cliffs Notes for you....

originally posted by: Trillium
How about this little tidbit

Drip Drip

Does not seem to be having the effect it was probably intended to.

Seems quite a few posters think its stupid.

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: jedi_hamster

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: Konduit
More proof of just how fraudulent Clinton's support base is. They literally have to pay people and provide them with false narratives to keep up with Trump's support base.

These people are DESPERATE.

CTR is a PAC. not paid for by Clinton. As far as I know, they were actually were to argue on sites when non factual things about Clinton were posted. But even if this memo is real, again, Trump supporters do much of the same thing.

The wording, though, seems over the top. You would have to pay quite a bit for people to engage in such complicated attacks.

the wording suggests that whoever created it, isn't stupid.

there's an image of Hillary supporters pushed around, violent ones, stupid ones (like that SJW that gave a finger to wrong man). i guess they're hiring an equal bunch of quite smart ones.

The wording of whatever that document is suggests the person who created it is not stupid.

There is no way to know who created it and to what end.

So, Hilllary supporters are pushed around are also violent and what is this about an SJW giving a finger???

perhaps my grammar in that sentence could've been better, english isn't my native language. my point was that Hillary supporters are pushed as being stupid and violent. as for that SJW, there was a video clip around on ATS (still an active thread i think) of a woman giving a finger to a man just because he was a Trump supporter. obviously, she's quite vocal about her support for Hillary, and quite unhinged for that matter.

the wording of this document paints quite a different picture.