WTF Do These Wikileaks Numbers Mean?---BREAKING

originally posted by: Realtruth

originally posted by: FauxMulder
Wikileaks confirmed on twitter Ecuador shut down his internet.

Why would they do that?

To be honest, if you had a guy hiding in your basement from a neighbour who want to ask him about a crime. A man who keeps making announcements through the basement window and trying to annoy other neighbours wouldn't you at some point get annoyed with him?

He's basically a lodger.

The Ecuadorian embassy have to pay for extra security while Assange sits in there eating takeaways. After conning his supporters to pay his bail, screwing some of them out of money.

I'd of kicked him out a long time ago. What's he scared of?

originally posted by: raymundoko
a reply to: SudoNim
POST REMOVED BY STAFF

[snipped]

Anyway, on target....this all feels so intense. It feels like Hollywood. It feels like a movie. Like it's all staged and put out there to garner this EXACT type of reaction. It has a small community of the world locked on to it saying watch me and think about Wikileaks and try to solve this puzzle.

I've heard people suggest that the whole Wikileaks thing has been infiltrated and is basically ran by TPTB anyway. Maybe they're dosing this to keep the eyes of the election specifically on all this. I don't know, just a thought.

originally posted by: MamaJ
a reply to: StargateSG7

But at the very least, I WILL INVESTIGATE the possibilities and report YAY or NAY on the results!

PLEASE make me aware of when you post the results or U2U me. I'm anxious to see what you can come up with. If you can break this... WOW.. I mean WOW! I just hope nothing happens to you. Have you thought about that or am I being too paranoid?

Thanks in advance!!

===

Again, there are NO GUARANTEES! Just a basic
source code investigation as to the POSSIBLE
merits (or not!) of an alleged UofT graduate
student study of a PROPOSED method to
reduce the number of AES-256 keycodes from
2^256th down to a brute-force attackable
2^128th combinations!

===

P.S. If "they" try ANY little stunt, they'll get a rather mighty and overt
demonstration of JUST HOW PHYSICALLY POWERFUL my friends really are!
They are NOT mere paper tigers.....

...
...
...
...
...

:-> :-> :->

originally posted by: Assassin82

originally posted by: raymundoko
a reply to: SudoNim

Now you are just embarrassing yourself. Your post history is clear for everyone to read. I agree this seems like an attempt to derail the thread so I'll drop it for another thread.

You're both derailing the thread acting like adolescent children bickering amongst each other on the playground. So grow up, both of you, or I'll have your mothers come and pick you one by one for the whole lot of us to witness and giggle about over a couple beers which you're not invited to partake in.

Anyway, on target....this all feels so intense. It feels like Hollywood. It feels like a movie. Like it's all staged and put out there to garner this EXACT type of reaction. It has a small community of the world locked on to it saying watch me and think about Wikileaks and try to solve this puzzle.

I've heard people suggest that the whole Wikileaks thing has been infiltrated and is basically ran by TPTB anyway. Maybe they're dosing this to keep the eyes of the election specifically on all this. I don't know, just a thought.

Intense? It's over. Nothing happened, again. Assange just wants some attention for his donation page and book sales. Clearly running out of takeaway money.

Ecuador cuts Julian Assange's internet access: WikiLeaks




www.reuters.com...

"We can confirm Ecuador cut off Assange's internet access Saturday, 5pm GMT, shortly after publication of (Hillary) Clinton's Goldman Sachs speechs (sic)," the statement from WikiLeaks said. Assange has lived and worked in Ecuador's London embassy since June 2012, having been granted asylum there after a British court ordered him extradited to Sweden to face questioning in a sexual molestation case involving two female WikiLeaks supporters.

originally posted by: SudoNim

originally posted by: Assassin82

originally posted by: raymundoko
a reply to: SudoNim

Now you are just embarrassing yourself. Your post history is clear for everyone to read. I agree this seems like an attempt to derail the thread so I'll drop it for another thread.

You're both derailing the thread acting like adolescent children bickering amongst each other on the playground. So grow up, both of you, or I'll have your mothers come and pick you one by one for the whole lot of us to witness and giggle about over a couple beers which you're not invited to partake in.

Anyway, on target....this all feels so intense. It feels like Hollywood. It feels like a movie. Like it's all staged and put out there to garner this EXACT type of reaction. It has a small community of the world locked on to it saying watch me and think about Wikileaks and try to solve this puzzle.

I've heard people suggest that the whole Wikileaks thing has been infiltrated and is basically ran by TPTB anyway. Maybe they're dosing this to keep the eyes of the election specifically on all this. I don't know, just a thought.

Intense? It's over. Nothing happened, again. Assange just wants some attention for his donation page and book sales. Clearly running out of takeaway money.

Like it's a scene out of an action movie about whistle blowers, intense. The reaction I felt by the ATS community in the beginning of the thread felt somewhat intense. All in all, the Julian Assange, Wikileaks, the emails, the US election and the domino effect it carries with it...it's all so intense. Perhaps there's a better word for it to explain it all.

Overall though, my feelings with Wikileaks is that it's all just overhyped rubbish. What they put out is some good stuff. But the fact that nothing will ever come from any of it beyond journalistic headlines and political debates by the masses, has me starting to think it's all apart of the show.

Please.... STAY ON TOPIC!

Seems pretty self-explanatory!
You are responsible for your own posts.

And, those who cannot stick to the topic, and be civil, posts will be gone...and Post Bans Issued.


and, as always:

Do NOT reply to this post!!

originally posted by: SudoNim

originally posted by: raymundoko
a reply to: SudoNim

Again, your posts speak for themselves. You think "Lesser Degree Rape" is a "form of rape" when according to Sweden it is NOT..

Since you seem very confused: "Lesser degree Rape" is not considered "Rape" in Sweden, nor is it considered a "form of rape". That is why it is a separate charge. "Lesser Degree Rape" in Sweden means: sexual coercion, or, lying to get laid. You are thoroughly ignorant of what you are arguing.

Sweden updated their laws in 2005 to add these "not actually rape" scenarios into the Rape Protection laws and it has reflected in their countries statistucs as not you have a higher chance of getting "raped" in Sweden that anywhere else in the world.

For example, Sweden reformed its sex crime legislation and made the legal definition of rape much wider in 2005,[3][4][8][12] which largely explains a significant increase in the number of reported rapes in the ten-year period of 2004-2013.[13][14]

Your own quote, just proved you wrong. He is wanted by Sweden for investigation on rape charges. End of.

No, that is not how translating works. Is simply is not.

And this is important when the topic is Julian Assange and the charges against him - if you wish to understand them, that is.

Even though words in two languages mean the same, it is not a given, that they carry the same meaning. Very often they do not, and law is by no mean an exception. It is one of the core challenges of machine translation. You cannot simply translate a word literally and be sure you translate it correctly.

Especially, I would say, when it comes to law, you cannot translate word for word, and this is definitely the case here, since the definitions of the charge "rape" and the charge "Våldtäkt" are not the same even though the words mean the same.

(Heck, you cannot even translate it properly from Swedish into Danish where the words basically ARE the same!)

In this case, the proper way to translate is to look at the definition of the charge in Swedish law and see to what in American law it correlates . If it does not correlate to anything, one should use wording that describes the charge.

Context and connotation mean so, so much in the act of translating.

a reply to: SudoNim

Phew! As long as it's your understanding then ipso facto they must be false. I guess if he didn't break the law he wouldn't be on the run, oh wait, its for his own protection, convenient.

Before being vindictive it would help you to go do some research - i also remember it had to do with testing for STD's, not rape in the traditional understanding of "rape" charges

originally posted by: ab0vean0n
POST REMOVED BY STAFF

===

and tell Mr. Costello that even the egotistical StargateSG7
TRIES to at least keep his writings SOMEWHAT relevant to
the topic at hand....I shan't aiden his nonsensical ramblings.

Anyways...Julian Assange SEEMS TO BE ALIVE AND WELL
at the Ecuadorian embassy/consulate in London, England.
His internet communications have been cut by the embassy itself!

HOWEVER, it seems that not only are embassy staff
getting fed up with all the antics, recently intercepted
communiques to and from US and Swedish officials indicate
it is NOT the USA or Sweden who have put HEAVIEST pressure
on Assange to be ejected from his compound but rather that
]the Ecuadorian government itself is becoming more and more
incensed at his media antics and the SHEER COST of keeping
Assange holed up indefinitely.

Certain grumblings from my "multi-country State-level Agency"
contacts indicate that soon (2 to 3 months?) Assange will be
ASKED to leave at the behest of consular officials within the
Ecuadorian government itself!

It has been suggested to me that the consulate offices
of Venezuela OR the West African country of Guinea
MAY BE ASKED to offer refuge to Assange.

As to whether or not those countries would
ACTUALLY AGREE to such a request and the
LOGISTICS of moving him from the Ecuadorian
embassy to the other consular offices would
be rather problematic in my opinion!

AN interesting Wikileaks day this is turning out to be !!!!!!!

a reply to: Ameilia

www.reuters.com...

By Mark Hosenball | WASHINGTON WASHINGTON (Reuters)

The two Swedish women who accuse WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange of sexual misconduct were at first not seeking to bring charges against him. They just wanted to track him down and persuade him to be tested for sexually transmitted diseases, according to several people in contact with his entourage at the time.

The women went to the police together after they failed to persuade Assange to go to a doctor after separate sexual encounters with him in August, according to these people, who include former close associates of Assange who have since fallen out with him.

The women had trouble finding Assange because he had turned off his cellphone out of concern his enemies might trace him, these sources said. Assange, who was arrested and held in custody by a British court Tuesday, has both admirers and detractors. His WikiLeaks group publishes secret documents from governments and companies, most recently making public a vast trove of U.S. State Department cables between Washington and embassies abroad that have cast a revealing and sometimes embarrassing eye on the inner workings of U.S. diplomacy. Assange's elusiveness may have worked against him in the Swedish investigation, which might well have gone nowhere had he taken the women's calls and not left Sweden when police started looking into the allegations.

a reply to: SudoNim

. It's not sensationalist to call lesser-degree rape... rape. It is a form of rape.

No it's not. I just posted a link so you know the difference between a "demand to be tested for STD's" and a "rape" charge allegation.
Took me less than 2 minutes to find it...