RELEASE: The Podesta Emails Part 9

Ok what this all about



twitter.com...

originally posted by: oddnutz
a reply to: DJW001

I would have thought it would be better to appoint people on their merits and experience rather than the color of their skin or ethnicity?

If you have a couple of equally qualified people picking people with different life experiences comes into play.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: MysticPearl

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Cobaltic1978

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Cobaltic1978

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
Another day, another release and still Hillary's supporters will say this is all a deflection.

It is not a deflection, neither does it show any wrong doing. It does prove, however that the US is fighting Daesh, not supporting it. Why won't anyone comment on that aspect?

Unaware and compliant citizenry (release 8) yeah there is certainly no ill intent there is there?

Okay, I'm willing to call this. What wasn't bad? Maybe we can apply it to everyday citizenry?

And you think you wouldn't be reading similar thinking in GOP email discussions.

But, GOP emails would need to be released for that to happen.

You're being manipulated by a one sided campaign.

But Clintons are just soooooo juicy. Stop being manipulated Annee.

Show me the hacked emails from the other side.

Logic: all politicians will discuss strategies in a "think tank" manner.

Absolutely, but we have in black and white, exactly what Hillary's campaign team and various think tanks actually think of the citizenry, including you.

Thank tank - - throwing around ideas.

Yeah, so?

Nazi Germany started with "think tanks", by your logic.

And not everything they did was bad.

Okay I'm willing to call this. Exactly which parts weren't bad about the Nazis?

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Cobaltic1978

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
Another day, another release and still Hillary's supporters will say this is all a deflection.

It is not a deflection, neither does it show any wrong doing. It does prove, however that the US is fighting Daesh, not supporting it. Why won't anyone comment on that aspect?

Unaware and compliant citizenry (release 8) yeah there is certainly no ill intent there is there?

And you think you wouldn't be reading similar thinking in GOP email discussions.

But, GOP emails would need to be released for that to happen.

You're being manipulated by a one sided campaign.

But Clintons are just soooooo juicy. Stop being manipulated Annee.

Show me the hacked emails from the other side.

Logic: all politicians will discuss strategies in a "think tank" manner.

Remember how someone hacked Palin's emails and printed them all out and the press asked people to dig through them to help out with finding dirt?

Oh, then there was that time someone at the IRS leaked out Romney's tax returns ...

Oh, and then there were the pages of Trump's tax returns the Times got ahold of printed ...

All of that was done illegally, but I don't recall anyone complaining.

a reply to: Trillium

My guess is that the are not hash codes but are rather decryption keys. My theory on another thread is that Pamela Anderson either delivered a message from the US government or relayed information that Assange has interpreted as a threat to his life or to Wikileaks, a threat of the most direct kind.

"Pre-commitment" tells us that this is part of Assange and Wikileaks insurance against assassination or some other kind of 'take down' by the US and the UK. It has been suggested that each name indicates that the file in question has to do with the USA's Secretary John Kerry, the nation of Ecuador, and Boris Johnson's UK FCO office (I think the UK FCO office is under Boris Johnson now, but I could be wrong on that count).

There has been a lot of chatter on the internet about extreme pressure from the USA and the UK being put upon Ecuador to rescind asylum for Assange and to turn him over. There is also chatter about the UK delisting the Ecuadorian Embassy as a recognised embassy thereby enabling apprehension of Assange. A lot of the chatter has presumed that these pre-commitment keys may indicate that Assange is already dead, dying, or under life-threatening conditions.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Cobaltic1978

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
Another day, another release and still Hillary's supporters will say this is all a deflection.

It is not a deflection, neither does it show any wrong doing. It does prove, however that the US is fighting Daesh, not supporting it. Why won't anyone comment on that aspect?

Unaware and compliant citizenry (release 8) yeah there is certainly no ill intent there is there?

And you think you wouldn't be reading similar thinking in GOP email discussions.

But, GOP emails would need to be released for that to happen.

You're being manipulated by a one sided campaign.

But Clintons are just soooooo juicy. Stop being manipulated Annee.

Show me the hacked emails from the other side.

Logic: all politicians will discuss strategies in a "think tank" manner.

Ohhh so you'll gladly look at and believe hacked emails if it's about the GOP, but not if it's about Hillary.

I don't think anything more needs to be discussed here.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: MysticPearl

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Cobaltic1978

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Cobaltic1978

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
Another day, another release and still Hillary's supporters will say this is all a deflection.

It is not a deflection, neither does it show any wrong doing. It does prove, however that the US is fighting Daesh, not supporting it. Why won't anyone comment on that aspect?

Unaware and compliant citizenry (release 8) yeah there is certainly no ill intent there is there?

And you think you wouldn't be reading similar thinking in GOP email discussions.

But, GOP emails would need to be released for that to happen.

You're being manipulated by a one sided campaign.

But Clintons are just soooooo juicy. Stop being manipulated Annee.

Show me the hacked emails from the other side.

Logic: all politicians will discuss strategies in a "think tank" manner.

Absolutely, but we have in black and white, exactly what Hillary's campaign team and various think tanks actually think of the citizenry, including you.

Thank tank - - throwing around ideas.

Yeah, so?

Nazi Germany started with "think tanks", by your logic.

And not everything they did was bad.

But it all lead up to what the Nazis did.

Wow. Smh.

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Cobaltic1978

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
Another day, another release and still Hillary's supporters will say this is all a deflection.

It is not a deflection, neither does it show any wrong doing. It does prove, however that the US is fighting Daesh, not supporting it. Why won't anyone comment on that aspect?

Unaware and compliant citizenry (release 8) yeah there is certainly no ill intent there is there?

And you think you wouldn't be reading similar thinking in GOP email discussions.

But, GOP emails would need to be released for that to happen.

You're being manipulated by a one sided campaign.

But Clintons are just soooooo juicy. Stop being manipulated Annee.

Show me the hacked emails from the other side.

Logic: all politicians will discuss strategies in a "think tank" manner.

Ohhh so you'll gladly look at and believe hacked emails if it's about the GOP, but not if it's about Hillary.

I don't think anything more needs to be discussed here.

All I said is - - its one sided.

How do you make an assessment with only 1/2 of the puzzle?

a reply to: Cobaltic1978



Ill oblige.


- The first nation to pass animal rights legislation such as hunting seasons and limits, placed some animals on protected species lists and acted to prevent animal vivisections.
- First western nation to try to combat the tobacco health epidemic with information campaigns and taxes.
- First nation to test drivers on public roads for blood alcohol content
- Ran one of the most extensive and inclusive public wealth-fare programs in history for their citizens.
- Extremely ahead of their time with regards to womens rights
- Extensive, inclusive public housing programs
- Extensive, inclusive public health programs
- First nation to put a ban in place regarding the development of nuclear weapons
- Maintained one of the lowest unemployment rates in modern history.
- Significantly reduced violent crimes and property theft
- Advanced medical research in many key areas
- Large contributor to arts and culture
- Invented modern sewerage treatment techniques, television broadcasting protocols, infra-red, stealth, jet planes, black box flight recorders, microwave cooking, methadone, synthetic fuels - all created by a Nationalist Socialist government that was near bank-rupt at its inception.

Those are some pretty good points about the Nazis and I'm no expert on this so I suspect they have many more positive achievements that benefitted mankind. Before those with limited comprehension ability respond, being able to see both sides of an argument does not make me an ardent Nazi party supporter. Far from it.

But in my opinion the liberalized echo-chamber which refuses to allow people to critically think for themselves is just as damaging to mankind's prospects as the Nazi party ever was. Please do some private research next time and you will not appear so ignorant to basic facts that are publically available to anyone.

a reply to: DJW001

THE PART WHERE we are reading it NOW and THE stupid COW who couldn't secure it, is walking around free.

originally posted by: cavtrooper7
a reply to: DJW001

THE PART WHERE we are reading it NOW and THE stupid COW who couldn't secure it, is walking around free.

There are a lot of people who killed other people just because a corrupt government told them to walking around free, too. Go ahead and vote for the guy who boasted about raping women when he knew he was miked. He can keep a secret better than the woman who did not actually reveal any actionable intelligence in her emails.

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: cavtrooper7
a reply to: DJW001

THE PART WHERE we are reading it NOW and THE stupid COW who couldn't secure it, is walking around free.

There are a lot of people who killed other people just because a corrupt government told them to walking around free, too. Go ahead and vote for the guy who boasted about raping women when he knew he was miked. He can keep a secret better than the woman who did not actually reveal any actionable intelligence in her emails.

Go ahead and push one bad candidate over another bad candidate when there are two others that don't even get a mention.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Cobaltic1978

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
Another day, another release and still Hillary's supporters will say this is all a deflection.

It is not a deflection, neither does it show any wrong doing. It does prove, however that the US is fighting Daesh, not supporting it. Why won't anyone comment on that aspect?

Unaware and compliant citizenry (release 8) yeah there is certainly no ill intent there is there?

And you think you wouldn't be reading similar thinking in GOP email discussions.

But, GOP emails would need to be released for that to happen.

You're being manipulated by a one sided campaign.

But Clintons are just soooooo juicy. Stop being manipulated Annee.

Show me the hacked emails from the other side.

Logic: all politicians will discuss strategies in a "think tank" manner.

Ohhh so you'll gladly look at and believe hacked emails if it's about the GOP, but not if it's about Hillary.

I don't think anything more needs to be discussed here.

All I said is - - its one sided.

How do you make an assessment with only 1/2 of the puzzle?

Only half of the puzzle is running for president.

originally posted by: ketsuko

They're saying this woman is a sex assault accuser and her she is emailing a Trump campaign assistant 5 months ago?

Wow... i wonder if the Clinton fans will start to realize what is going on, or is the wool still draped right in front of their eyes and will claim "nothing to see here, move along"...