RELEASE: The Podesta Emails Part 9

This is from Jake Siewert over at Goldman Sachs in response to the story about Dennis Hastret's tax indictment:

Might be time for Denny to vanish to an undisclosed Japanese island.

/podesta-emails/emailid/11508#efmAAGABL

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
This is from Jake Siewert over at Goldman Sachs in response to the story about Dennis Hastret's tax indictment:

Might be time for Denny to vanish to an undisclosed Japanese island.

/podesta-emails/emailid/11508#efmAAGABL

Amelia Earhart reference.

this is better than reality tv.

originally posted by: Annee

And you think you wouldn't be reading similar thinking in GOP email discussions.

But, GOP emails would need to be released for that to happen.

You're being manipulated by a one sided campaign.

You know you're right, the MSM is manipulating the entire election towards Clinton.

Good thing we have these leaks to expose it right?

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: TomLawless
That first email, from the Trump accuser is fairly damning.

If he did what she said he did, there is no way she would basically beg for him to come to her restaurant. I own a restaurant, and it's like my house. People that have wronged me are not welcome.

Again, she may have had an ulterior motive for meeting with him. (But just ignore the possibility and keep believing whatever you want to believe. Either way, Trump is a liar.)

Blackmail? Hmm yes, she's so righteous and he is is lying scum. /s

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Cobaltic1978

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
Another day, another release and still Hillary's supporters will say this is all a deflection.

It is not a deflection, neither does it show any wrong doing. It does prove, however that the US is fighting Daesh, not supporting it. Why won't anyone comment on that aspect?

Unaware and compliant citizenry (release 8) yeah there is certainly no ill intent there is there?

And you think you wouldn't be reading similar thinking in GOP email discussions.

But, GOP emails would need to be released for that to happen.

You're being manipulated by a one sided campaign.

But Clintons are just soooooo juicy. Stop being manipulated Annee.

a reply to: DJW001

Because the troops know its a fake story based on the lack of suppression and expansion of ISIS forces using US weapons and OUR IQ is a tad higher.

originally posted by: DJW001

Except that there is no mention of actual troop strength beyond "skeleton crew."

Wow the ignorance is staggering, would you have known without this email that the troop strength was dwindling down to a skeleton crew? Are you comprehending what you're reading?

originally posted by: AboveBoard
a reply to: IAMTAT

It is illegal to possess stolen property. I think that's been the case all along.

I don't think they said it was illegal to look at them, so I think he's talking about personally downloading them.

Not a conspiracy IMO. A warning for people who don't know that so they don't get in trouble. A PSA.

AB

OK.

Show us the law that says it is OK for CNN propagandists to handle "stolen property" documents then.

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Cobaltic1978

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
Another day, another release and still Hillary's supporters will say this is all a deflection.

It is not a deflection, neither does it show any wrong doing. It does prove, however that the US is fighting Daesh, not supporting it. Why won't anyone comment on that aspect?

Unaware and compliant citizenry (release 8) yeah there is certainly no ill intent there is there?

And you think you wouldn't be reading similar thinking in GOP email discussions.

But, GOP emails would need to be released for that to happen.

You're being manipulated by a one sided campaign.

But Clintons are just soooooo juicy. Stop being manipulated Annee.

Show me the hacked emails from the other side.

Logic: all politicians will discuss strategies in a "think tank" manner.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Cobaltic1978

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
Another day, another release and still Hillary's supporters will say this is all a deflection.

It is not a deflection, neither does it show any wrong doing. It does prove, however that the US is fighting Daesh, not supporting it. Why won't anyone comment on that aspect?

Unaware and compliant citizenry (release 8) yeah there is certainly no ill intent there is there?

And you think you wouldn't be reading similar thinking in GOP email discussions.

But, GOP emails would need to be released for that to happen.

You're being manipulated by a one sided campaign.

But Clintons are just soooooo juicy. Stop being manipulated Annee.

Show me the hacked emails from the other side.

Logic: all politicians will discuss strategies in a "think tank" manner.

Absolutely, but we have in black and white, exactly what Hillary's campaign team and various think tanks actually think of the citizenry, including you.

originally posted by: Cobaltic1978

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Cobaltic1978

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
Another day, another release and still Hillary's supporters will say this is all a deflection.

It is not a deflection, neither does it show any wrong doing. It does prove, however that the US is fighting Daesh, not supporting it. Why won't anyone comment on that aspect?

Unaware and compliant citizenry (release 8) yeah there is certainly no ill intent there is there?

And you think you wouldn't be reading similar thinking in GOP email discussions.

But, GOP emails would need to be released for that to happen.

You're being manipulated by a one sided campaign.

But Clintons are just soooooo juicy. Stop being manipulated Annee.

Show me the hacked emails from the other side.

Logic: all politicians will discuss strategies in a "think tank" manner.

Absolutely, but we have in black and white, exactly what Hillary's campaign team and various think tanks actually think of the citizenry, including you.

Thank tank - - throwing around ideas.

Yeah, so?

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Cobaltic1978

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Cobaltic1978

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
Another day, another release and still Hillary's supporters will say this is all a deflection.

It is not a deflection, neither does it show any wrong doing. It does prove, however that the US is fighting Daesh, not supporting it. Why won't anyone comment on that aspect?

Unaware and compliant citizenry (release 8) yeah there is certainly no ill intent there is there?

And you think you wouldn't be reading similar thinking in GOP email discussions.

But, GOP emails would need to be released for that to happen.

You're being manipulated by a one sided campaign.

But Clintons are just soooooo juicy. Stop being manipulated Annee.

Show me the hacked emails from the other side.

Logic: all politicians will discuss strategies in a "think tank" manner.

Absolutely, but we have in black and white, exactly what Hillary's campaign team and various think tanks actually think of the citizenry, including you.

Thank tank - - throwing around ideas.

Yeah, so?

Okay, you made your position clear, very clear.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Cobaltic1978

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Cobaltic1978

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
Another day, another release and still Hillary's supporters will say this is all a deflection.

It is not a deflection, neither does it show any wrong doing. It does prove, however that the US is fighting Daesh, not supporting it. Why won't anyone comment on that aspect?

Unaware and compliant citizenry (release 8) yeah there is certainly no ill intent there is there?

And you think you wouldn't be reading similar thinking in GOP email discussions.

But, GOP emails would need to be released for that to happen.

You're being manipulated by a one sided campaign.

But Clintons are just soooooo juicy. Stop being manipulated Annee.

Show me the hacked emails from the other side.

Logic: all politicians will discuss strategies in a "think tank" manner.

Absolutely, but we have in black and white, exactly what Hillary's campaign team and various think tanks actually think of the citizenry, including you.

Thank tank - - throwing around ideas.

Yeah, so?

Nazi Germany started with "think tanks", by your logic.

originally posted by: Nucleardoom

originally posted by: DJW001

Except that there is no mention of actual troop strength beyond "skeleton crew."

Wow the ignorance is staggering, would you have known without this email that the troop strength was dwindling down to a skeleton crew? Are you comprehending what you're reading?

I agree the ignorance is staggering.The President made a show of drawing down the troops, so yes. The Taliban wouldn't need a hacked email, all they would need is a TV. Oh, and binoculars.

originally posted by: cavtrooper7
a reply to: DJW001

Because the troops know its a fake story based on the lack of suppression and expansion of ISIS forces using US weapons and OUR IQ is a tad higher.

What part of "this email was never supposed to be seen by the public" are you not understanding?

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: TomLawless
That first email, from the Trump accuser is fairly damning.

If he did what she said he did, there is no way she would basically beg for him to come to her restaurant. I own a restaurant, and it's like my house. People that have wronged me are not welcome.

Again, she may have had an ulterior motive for meeting with him. (But just ignore the possibility and keep believing whatever you want to believe. Either way, Trump is a liar.)

Blackmail? Hmm yes, she's so righteous and he is is lying scum. /s

Either Trump was telling the truth about assaulting women in the video, or he is a proven liar. Either way supports her story, not his.

a reply to: Nucleardoom

You know you're right, the MSM is manipulating the entire election towards Clinton.

And who is manipulating it towards Trump?

originally posted by: MysticPearl

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Cobaltic1978

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Wardaddy454

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Cobaltic1978

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
Another day, another release and still Hillary's supporters will say this is all a deflection.

It is not a deflection, neither does it show any wrong doing. It does prove, however that the US is fighting Daesh, not supporting it. Why won't anyone comment on that aspect?

Unaware and compliant citizenry (release 8) yeah there is certainly no ill intent there is there?

And you think you wouldn't be reading similar thinking in GOP email discussions.

But, GOP emails would need to be released for that to happen.

You're being manipulated by a one sided campaign.

But Clintons are just soooooo juicy. Stop being manipulated Annee.

Show me the hacked emails from the other side.

Logic: all politicians will discuss strategies in a "think tank" manner.

Absolutely, but we have in black and white, exactly what Hillary's campaign team and various think tanks actually think of the citizenry, including you.

Thank tank - - throwing around ideas.

Yeah, so?

Nazi Germany started with "think tanks", by your logic.

And not everything they did was bad.

originally posted by: Deny Arrogance

originally posted by: AboveBoard
a reply to: IAMTAT

It is illegal to possess stolen property. I think that's been the case all along.

I don't think they said it was illegal to look at them, so I think he's talking about personally downloading them.

Not a conspiracy IMO. A warning for people who don't know that so they don't get in trouble. A PSA.

AB

OK.

Show us the law that says it is OK for CNN propagandists to handle "stolen property" documents then.

Exactly. This is what I am on about. Who or what(law) gives them authority or jurisdiction over these leaks? Over us? Us plebes want an answer. The media personnel are the same as the common man, they just have a job and a face on TV and news print. I suspect their ties and involvement to the staged propaganda and their own corruption is starting to show through the curtain.

Also kudos to the members who have the time and wherewithal to sift through these leaks and post them to us here. again THANK YOU