RELEASE: The Podesta Emails Part 9

a reply to: IAMTAT

Yeah. I forgot about that one.

Something about exposing himself during a massage or something? Hard to keep track of them all.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Cobaltic1978

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
Another day, another release and still Hillary's supporters will say this is all a deflection.

It is not a deflection, neither does it show any wrong doing. It does prove, however that the US is fighting Daesh, not supporting it. Why won't anyone comment on that aspect?

Unaware and compliant citizenry (release 8) yeah there is certainly no ill intent there is there?

And you think you wouldn't be reading similar thinking in GOP email discussions.

But, GOP emails would need to be released for that to happen.

You're being manipulated by a one sided campaign.

No, no, no.

I am not a Trump supporter, in fact I find it really sad that these two individuals are the best the Establishment can offer you.

What I am saying and I have said for a long time, that it is rigged and like all good unaware citizenry, the majority will be compliant and play the Establishmnets game of Electioning.

You are being manipulated if you support either candidate.

Edit - In the interests of fair reporting, the MSM should be reporting this, if they think ungrounded allegations against Trump are fair game.

originally posted by: LifeMode

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: DJW001

Or just mad that she wasn't more important to the campaign, so she backstabbed her way to a different kind of nortoriety.

She reaches out to Trump's teams telling them she is "cut from the same cloth" as Donald. She wanted a response because she was a small business owner. Never got it. She got mad. I use to be a sexual assault victim's advocate in the military. Very common for women who feel slighted by men to make false claims when they get rebuked. If I had to use my training and cases I have encountered this looks like a textbook version of it. A accusation out of nowhere when things seemed fine and no evidence to back it up. Even her sister or friend is saying she is lying. Nobody to back up any of it.

She got infuriated and wanted to get back at Trump otherwise she would have never said the cut from the same cloth statement and then lash out when she did not get the response she wanted.

I can't prove it but neither can she. My case is actually stronger since people who know her are saying she is lying. She never mentioned it to anyone, no close friends, no family. Nothing.

Precisely.

That little email speaks volumes of the veracity of some of these claims coming out. Pure obfuscation, and coupled with the media blackout of the wiki dumps, the Clinton plan is working like a charm.

That entire family is poison.

a reply to: oddnutz

I wonder if Donna Brazille knows that she was appointed to her position because of her skin color and no other reason.
If she has any integrity at all she will resign and speak out about this. She shouldn't allow herself to be used like this.

I've watched her on CNN many years and she is a talented individual who doesn't deserve to be treated as a token.

originally posted by: TomLawless
a reply to: IAMTAT

Yeah. I forgot about that one.

Something about exposing himself during a massage or something? Hard to keep track of them all.

A few massage therapists accused him. Hotels management was told to hush it but if I recall correctly they actually corroborated the story afterwards.

He was investigated by the police twice for one of the incidents but nothing came of it from what I remember....not enough evidence or something.

a reply to: TomLawless

Linking to them only provides the two main CTR guys on this site more ammo to discredit anyone not pro Hillary.

One of them was just banned.

Although there may be more than 2.

a reply to: Vasa Croe

Being a female massage therapist has got be about a creep out factor 11 on the 1-10 scale.

Especially when it comes to clients that are politicians.

a reply to: stosh64

I sent you a private message. I just have to know.

a reply to: ketsuko

A former Ms. Universe wrote a similar letter...actually several. She opened a new restaurant in the Hollywood area and invited Donald to visit, when he's in the area. But now, she's accusing him of an unspeakably hideous crime... improper kissing.

a reply to: Cobaltic1978

OK.

I vote for the direction I want to go.

I'm a globalist, equal rights/equal treatment, separation of church & state atheist.

Obviously not the current version of GOP.

I just wanted to pipe in and thank you all for staying on top of all of this!! I have been watching these threads like a hawk, and I never comment....just read. I have a feeling there are a lot more people like me lurking. Kudos!

Also, I just wanted to add this:
This morning I was on Facebook and saw the local Indianapolis Fox news posted about the newest Trump accuser. There was almost 200 comments at the time. 99 percent of them where dogging the station for unbiased reporting. A good majority were asking why they are not covering the Wikileaks.

My point being....a lot of people ARE paying attention to these. Not all people are gulping down the propoganda. It could be too little too late, but they're waking up.

a reply to: Cobaltic1978

I am not anti-Trump per se.

I am anti-Trump for president.

I don't think he's qualified, he's a bully, he's a narcissist, thin skinned, and seems unstable.

a reply to: TomLawless
Check your PM.

Soooo, how long before the daily Trump accusation?

originally posted by: Annee
a reply to: Cobaltic1978

I am not anti-Trump per se.

I am anti-Trump for president.

I don't think he's qualified, he's a bully, he's a narcissist, thin skinned, and seems unstable.

Hmmm, a lot of people felt that way about Obama, but I'll bet you didn't.

A couple of more excerpts:

Podesta's comment on the San Bernadino shooter:

Better if a guy named Sayeed Farouk was reporting that a guy named
Christopher Hayes was the shooter.

/podesta-emails/emailid/11500#efmAAGABr

One of their money grubbers:

Im swinging way above my weight class here, and I'm sure this is not > proper protocol . > > Im trying to land a big fat whale for HRC. They would possible be able to > give between $100,000 to maybe $1 million.

/podesta-emails/emailid/11483#efmADZAGs

Pretty certain discussing operations is top secret and should not be going on over gmail?

We’re down to a skeleton >> staff at Camp Phoenix as folks redeploy to the states or move within >> Afghanistan. Amazingly, I am now the senior USAF Captain in the legal >> office. In a matter of weeks I’ve seen three go home and as a result >> I’m no longer the new guy; I’m the experienced veteran.

/podesta-emails/emailid/11484#efmAVMAZ6

Still searching. If anything significant is found I'll post a new thread, otherwise I'll keep dropping excerpts in here

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Yes, I'm pretty sure a USAF officer posting a troop strength assessment of his base in Afghanistan...is classified info.

a reply to: stosh64

I am getting the Sneaking Suspicion that this upcoming Presidential Election could somehow be Suspended due to Criminal Investigations on the side of Both Candidates due to an as of yet , Unknown Conspiracy .

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Yes, I'm pretty sure a USAF officer posting a troop strength assessment of his base in Afghanistan...is classified info.

Except that there is no mention of actual troop strength beyond "skeleton crew."

originally posted by: ketsuko

originally posted by: Annee
a reply to: Cobaltic1978

I am not anti-Trump per se.

I am anti-Trump for president.

I don't think he's qualified, he's a bully, he's a narcissist, thin skinned, and seems unstable.

Hmmm, a lot of people felt that way about Obama, but I'll bet you didn't.

I don't see the correlation. I voted for Obama because he said he was a methodical thinker.

My original point is the one-sidedness of the emails being presented.

Both political parties would have "think tank type" discussions.