It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ChesterJohn
a reply to: Matrixsurvivor
you opinion means nothing. We are not Israel n the land nor do they practice that law anyway.
Time to come back to reality or modern times.
originally posted by: Matrixsurvivor
a reply to: whereislogic
Jesus Christ, the Messiah and Son of Jehovah God, who is the Most High he's speaking of as merciful and kind toward the unthankful and wicked, including those who speak badly of Jehovah, the Most High and judge Him as being cruel and/or evil:
Jehovah (YHWH) is not the Most High. YHWH was not merciful and kind towards anyone. The MOST HIGH is, though.
Paul wasn't either. He was too busy talking about himself and promoting his false gospel...and cursing those who didn't believe him.
originally posted by: Matrixsurvivor
originally posted by: ChesterJohn
a reply to: Matrixsurvivor
you opinion means nothing. We are not Israel n the land nor do they practice that law anyway.
Time to come back to reality or modern times.
Have you read the Torah at all?
Besides, just because the Nicene council decided to include Paul's letters, doesn't mean Paul automatically gets included in "the preserved word of God". Paul hadn't even been born yet when that Psalm was written.
One minute you are touting the inerrancy of scripture... then you are saying man/Satan has tampered with it. You can't have it both ways.
originally posted by: ChesterJohn
a reply to: Matrixsurvivor
I don't practice any of that under the gospel of the grace of God.
Godly women know how to behave in church.
No innocent beings or animals are sacrificed today and have not been for millennium.
No one practiced any of the things you mention since the time of Christ. No biblical proof Israel followed the law as a matter of fact it seems they were scattered abroad because they didn't follow God's laws, precepts, ordinances, statutes, judgements, and ways.
You are being illogical seeing no one has practiced any of that for millennium.
try living in this world and stop looking to something that we can never prove even took place.
originally posted by: Malocchio
originally posted by: Matrixsurvivor
originally posted by: ChesterJohn
a reply to: Matrixsurvivor
you opinion means nothing. We are not Israel n the land nor do they practice that law anyway.
Time to come back to reality or modern times.
Have you read the Torah at all?
Besides, just because the Nicene council decided to include Paul's letters, doesn't mean Paul automatically gets included in "the preserved word of God". Paul hadn't even been born yet when that Psalm was written.
One minute you are touting the inerrancy of scripture... then you are saying man/Satan has tampered with it. You can't have it both ways.
He claims that the Bible is the ''preserved word of God" but only his Bible, whatever version.
Then says that Matthew the Apostle isn't Jesus so when he says their are only 12 Apostles and Revelation and Acts confirm it that it's the tradition of man and not God that their are 12 Apostles.
He likes to have his cake and eat it too.
I am still waiting for his answer to my questions:
1. What IS the "word of truth."
2. How do you ''divide" the word of truth properly.
3. How do you distribute the divisions of the "word of truth."
I asked a week ago but he won't answer.
I assume he means Jew vs. Gentile regarding the division, needless to say this dividing is based on race and not beliefs, like Jews go with the 12 and Greeks/Romans/Nations/Gentiles go with Paul.
That's textbook heresy and I know of no church that teaches this, not even unorthodox cult Christianity.
People place so much faith in the Bible being the last and final/only scripture when the good stuff is all in the Apocrypha and the Catholic Church decided what was Canon but Protestants don't doubt that it is God preserved even though the Romans were as corrupt as it gets and truth was no concern of theirs.
You gotta laugh!
originally posted by: ChesterJohn
a reply to: Matrixsurvivor
Of course I have and the first five books of the OT s well as the whole Bible many many times and in many different versions. I own Torah copy as well as a Tanak copy.
I don't agree with any creeds Nicene or other they are not the final word God's preserved word is.
Only ONE bible version is God's preserved word the rest are the works of men and satan tools to confuse people like you. And he has done a great job at it as I can tell.
Please don't put words in my mouth I did not say. Anyone here who has known me for many years here knows my stand on the word of God
originally posted by: ChesterJohn
a reply to: Matrixsurvivor
Where is you logic?
You asked me to comment on archaic Israeli rituals and practices and on women from somewhere out of the north forty and I answer in the truth and then you twist it and want to know about men's behaviour.
Good gracious man, where is your wisdom and knowledge you claim to have from reading the bible for 25 years?
Everything is to be done decently and in order any godly person knows that.
why is it you want to try or think that today's does animal sacrifices, and some archaic rules that don't fit today's culture?
And if any one organization chooses not to let women preach so what they have that prerogative because scriptures do speak of such. If other do allow it so what. every man/worker will be judged according too their own work. If we don't like it we can move on to some where we like if we so choose. Free will and choice.
Personally I think you hate Christianity it is the only answer for the direction you have gone in trying to disprove Pau and the preserved word of God
Where is you logic?
You asked me to comment on archaic Israeli rituals and practices and on women from somewhere out of the north forty and I answer in the truth and then you twist it and want to know about men's behaviour.
Good gracious man, where is your wisdom and knowledge you claim to have from reading the bible for 25 years?
Everything is to be done decently and in order any godly person knows that.
why is it you want to try or think that today's does animal sacrifices, and some archaic rules that don't fit today's culture?
And if any one organization chooses not to let women preach so what they have that prerogative because scriptures do speak of such. If other do allow it so what. every man/worker will be judged according too their own work. If we don't like it we can move on to some where we like if we so choose. Free will and choice.
Personally I think you hate Christianity it is the only answer for the direction you have gone in trying to disprove Pau and the preserved word of God
originally posted by: ChesterJohn
a reply to: Matrixsurvivor
Of course I have and the first five books of the OT s well as the whole Bible many many times and in many different versions. I own Torah copy as well as a Tanak copy.
I don't agree with any creeds Nicene or other they are not the final word God's preserved word is.
Only ONE bible version is God's preserved word the rest are the works of men and satan tools to confuse people like you. And he has done a great job at it as I can tell.
Please don't put words in my mouth I did not say. Anyone here who has known me for many years here knows my stand on the word of God
A Catholic Church, I believe, as they only say Peter was the Rock because Jesus says it but the New Testament is dominated by Paul. Catholic theology depends on Pauline theology to establish its right to have hierarchical clergy of men only and slavery, obedience to human ''authorities'', and most of its pagan concepts, holidays. Original sin, established because of Eve according to Catholic teachings. The Church fathers of the post Nicene church hated women. They were obsessed with celibacy which was never required by the Gospels or the Old Testament, you couldn't be a High Priest without a wife.
according to Eusebius the Ebionim/Ebionites claimed Paul was actually a Greek who converted to Judaism to court the daughter of the High Priest but was denied and embarrassed and this is why he joined the Nazarene sect but they also rejected him.
The last time Paul was in Jerusalem he was submitting to a Nazirite purification ritual of head shaving because of his anti Torah teachings. The Torah was the sacred book of the Israelites so teaching against it is equivalent to heresy in this sect. Better to metaphorically interpret anything that was too cruel or unusual than forsake your heritage. Greeks even liked Hebrew mythology and had been reading it for centuries too so it was a part of the fabric of religious life and any teaching that calls it a "curse that is of the Law" like Paul's needed to be atoned for.
originally posted by: Malocchio
a reply to: Matrixsurvivor
He also states that anyone who submits to "the mutilation '' or circumcision is "bound to the whole Law (Torah) or the Mosaic Law. Not just the ten commandments but the whole Law, even though it had long been decided this wasn't necessary for non Hebrew converts.
Essentially a propaganda campaign against ''the circumcision faction."
"who SEEMED to be pillars."
who "added nothing to me" (taught him nothing).
"No marvel!! Even Satan appears as an angel of light." This is about the Apostles when he says it, calling them sarcastically "super apostles." two paragraphs earlier and is calling the pillars of the Jerusalem Church this.