Who are you voting for in the 2016 presidential election? UPDATED

Have the Hillbots put her in the lead yet?

a reply to: humanityrising

Last time it was like 90% Trump the first 4 hours (about 840 votes). Then all the sudden it was Hillary way out in front. I mean in an hour. But the math didnt compute. The numbers of votes for each was impossible without some kind of major (server side) intervention. It was discussed in the thread (I think somewhere around page 6-8) from a couple weeks ago it happened.

a reply to: humanityrising

Or a way to have a backup plan in case the Hillary plan truly crash and burns due to an overwhelming #storm of crap against her that can't be swept under the rug.

originally posted by: humanityrising
I'm pretty sure 90% of the votes are double votes :/

Me and at least one other tested it, and even though we could technically "vote" twice the number didn't change.

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

I did vote like 20 times for stein and they all took. But I did it by going through the link over and over again.

Well there it is. Sometimes it will take more than one. Other times it will not. When I tested it it took a couple tries to see it not happen, I had to try it more than once anyways to ensure others hadn't happened to be voting at that moment.

Whatever it is this website stinks.

Would enjoy seeing a proper thread. Perhaps if ATS's PTB started running one proper every couple weeks. Just for the sake of Interesting.

CONSTITUTION PARTY OF THE U.S.:
Darrell CastleScott Bradley

Darrell Castle (Tennessee)
Presidential Nominee

Scott Bradley (Utah)
Vice Presidential Nominee

Looks like a landslide for Trump!

a reply to: imitator

Stein hasn't gained much since I stopped I see.

a reply to: imitator

How is there even 100+ for Hillery? Must be bots... has to be..

originally posted by: imitator
Looks like a landslide for Trump!

LOL - somethings going on, how does Hillary lose 17 votes in less than 1 hour (this is from my post on pg1), unless the poll corrects for multiple votes from the same IP address and cancels them??

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: humanityrising

Last time it was like 90% Trump the first 4 hours (about 840 votes). Then all the sudden it was Hillary way out in front. I mean in an hour. But the math didnt compute. The numbers of votes for each was impossible without some kind of major (server side) intervention. It was discussed in the thread (I think somewhere around page 6-8) from a couple weeks ago it happened.

Ahh I see. Well as of yet it's still uncontaminated by them, but who knows whether they're coming. There is certainly an online presence of Hillary 'fans'. The fact that Correct The Record even exists is a testament to the kind of deception and corruption the American people are dealing with in their government.

originally posted by: Puppylove
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

I did vote like 20 times for stein and they all took. But I did it by going through the link over and over again.

:facepalm:

originally posted by: TinfoilTP
These polls are fake. One can relog as many times as they want and vote hundreds of times in a matter of minutes.
All it takes is one fanatic to destroy the poll, and you think you won't find any fanatics around here?

Anyone who does that is a coward who's candidate will never win.

(almost had to give Trump ten votes when I saw Hillary at %25 correct the record must of got word of the ATS pole.)

Also most polls have ways to manipulate them from within, or from the outside. Also I question if it takes a certain type of person to agree to, or want to be polled, 9 times out of 10 I'd ignore it. Are there any credible polls that actually interview real people from diverse regions of the US?

a reply to: seventhinline

Or they already know the poll is broken and were having fun. I was racing the Trumpers unknown to them as a Stein supporter, but dammit they were too fast, overcame me and flew by. Had to give up.

A real pole wouldn't allow for that sillyness. I'd rather make sure broken poles get no legitimacy than have idiots convinced by BS results.

originally posted by: humanityrising
I'm curious as to which decision my fellow ATSers will make. If you could flag this to get more exposure that would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
EDIT: A new poll has been created that does not allow multiple votes. Please contribute to this new one as it will be way more accurate:

NEW FAIR POLL HERE.
Results of new poll HERE.




For the sake of comparison, the old poll & results are below:
POLL.
Results can be found HERE.

I made a new poll where you can't cheat, and edited OP accordingly as you see above. Please contribute! It will be interesting to see the difference.

a reply to: humanityrising
Wow it actually appears to be fine for now.

a reply to: humanityrising

Another vote for Stein!!!!

Is working right for me, I dun tested it!

a reply to: humanityrising

Now my understanding of the program, you can change the rules at any time, so no touchy touchy

a reply to: humanityrising

Cool.
A poll of ATS members. A perfect representative cross section of US citizens.

Or not. You know this is not actually how real polling is done, right?