Secret Service spoke to Trump campaign about 2nd Amendment comment

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: uncommitted

Pots and kettles and such.

You should toss up a post! I'll even give ya your first flag.

In what way pots and kettles? I understand the term, but not what you are implying by it. Could you link me to any post I've made where I've linked to a blog stating an opinion which I have represented as a fact?

When I have something I feel I should share with people on ATS that is worthy of sharing then on that day I'll make a post. Better than posting random BS and adding my own personal opinion to it as though that makes it a fact.

originally posted by: kurthall
a reply to: marg6043

Not even a gun owner SHOULD be ignorant enough to vote for Trump! My gosh people, give it up, the man is poison! Too many main supporters have realized he is unfit for presidency and backed out! Wake up!!!!!!!

I love the fact the NewYork daily news said Donald Trump needs to end his campaign, and "This Isn't A Joke Anymore" LMAO

Says the guy/girl who wants Hillary elected for some reason....and who obviously doesnt support our 2nd amendment rights

a reply to: uncommitted

Here's the link to the OP: Link . I'm guessing you missed the part where I point out the lack of facts and my opinion.

If it's such random BS why on earth did you decide to be a part of it?

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: uncommitted

Here's the link to the OP: Link . I'm guessing you missed the part where I point out the lack of facts and my opinion.

If it's such random BS why on earth did you decide to be a part of it?

Quite simple really, you said the MSM is full of untruths and I questioned why ATS is any different. I actually said that so it's not as though you had to second guess what I meant........................ unlike Trump.

a reply to: uncommitted

Still a confused why you wish to remain part of the problem, in your eyes. Did you want to bash Trump? Go for it. Did you want to bash me because I posted something from a reputable (arguable) website and had a disagreement with it?

I don't think your being as clear as you think sir.

The problem is that 90% of what is discussed here...especially about the election...is spun out propaganda for one side or the other. Neither of the candidates are worth a damn. Neither of them are stately nor do they represent qualities I would like to be associated with the country I call home. Even more so neither of them are going to actually do a thing for me, or even you, yet here we are hashing out some heated debate where propaganda pieces are the theme...all the while everyone thinks this stuff is truth and accurate representation of reality. On a site who's motto is deny ignorance we sure do embrace a lot of it.

originally posted by: smurfy

originally posted by: Urantia1111
a reply to: JinMI

Correct me if im wrong, but isnt the language of the 2nd Amendment itself calling for citizens to violently rise up against an oppressive government?
I believe thats THE ENTIRE POINT.

Yes, but that could only relate here to whomever is the government now, and that's not Hilarly Clinton, unless it's okay to bump off a potential Presidential candidate...in advance. I don't think that is applicable.
In some ways, it is a singular endorsement as to why people should have the use of guns at all, which again does not apply here.

No, it applies just fine.

Trump is eluding to IF Hillary becomes president and attacks the 2nd Amendment.

Then supporters of The Bill of Rights would have a duty to protect those Rights.

Youre splitting hairs with your interpretation.

a reply to: JinMI

Does intent count?
You tell me?.

a reply to: Zanti Misfit

They have no money worries. . They have no problems getting donations.
Trump is having a problem raising money but Hills ... nope.

a reply to: jellyrev

So I guess you missed when the media played the entire clip of that sound bite where it clearly shows she was talking about the order of items on a list and not people getting killed when she said that?
Yes. That's correct. They were talking about a list that Susan Rice was working from and the order of things on that list when Hillary said what difference does it make.

Ok carry on. You've been schooled.

a reply to: marg6043

Spin yes. Who's spinning is another story altogether.

a reply to: xuenchen

Yeah it's everywhere not just CNN.

a reply to: marg6043

Try listening to what HE SAID instead of trying to convince us of what he meant.

a reply to: Logarock

No they did. It's not a false story. He's lying.

Again.

All he does is lie.

Double post.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: xuenchen

Yeah it's everywhere not just CNN.

CNN published the lie first.

Then everybody else jumped on the parrot perch.

a reply to: one4all

Again what he said. Everybody has a theory about what he meant.

a reply to: xuenchen

The tweet from the secret service was a lie?
Nice to know.

a reply to: Sillyolme

Can you quote the part where he says anything about violent action? It is true it was threatening...I mean if the 2nd amendment supporters all voted against her that would threaten her political ambitions correct? However I must have missed the part where he advocated violence against here or made some kind of threat against her person. I'm sure with as much talk as you do you can point it out right?