It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: six67seven
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious Thread, Bro!
Big S&F for the relevance and work put forth on this thread.
The Oxford English Dictionary estimates that the word "supercalifragilisticexpialidocious" was first attested in the 1940s.[2] The roots of the word have been defined[3] as follows: super- "above", cali- "beauty", fragilistic- "delicate", expiali- "to atone", and -docious "educable", with the sum of these parts signifying roughly "Atoning for educability through delicate beauty."
en.wikipedia.org...
originally posted by: Pinke
This one for example... The anti-SJW movement is filled with hot air and rhetoric. If they really want to stop negative ideologies and if they really are against Islamic hate against women, why aren't they in the Middle East running education programs and fighting religious extremists?
originally posted by: GodEmperor
Ending the war on drugs is a double edged sword.
In spring of 2001, the Taliban placed a ban on poppies in Afghanistan. This was the largest economic attack against America. After the invasion, heroin production sky-rocketed to 95% of world supply. The banking and intelligence apparatus relies on the injection of funds from the illicit drug trade.
Legalization would cause economic collapse.
Side note: I always thought SJW meant slack jawed wankers.
originally posted by: Asktheanimals
The fact the PTB are pushing such groups as the BLM so hard is a sure sign to me that they (the PTB) are more criminal than ever and are in fact getting ready to institute global governance whether we like it or not. It's coming and soon and the signs of it are popping up in the shootings of police officers in Dallas and Baton Rouge. First they will federalize the police then under the Strong Cities Initiative they can bring in mercenaries from other countries to keep things under control. Gun confiscation is sure to follow along with biometric ID of everyone.
If you do not speak out and do what you can to stop this madness you will reap the whirlwind.
We will all reap it much to our sorrow.
You're saying gays aren't over represented in media? Then how do you account for the public having the impression that some 20%+ of the population are gay, when its only 4%?
They use it to highlight the hypocrisy of the whole War On Drugs, it being the most harmful drug of all.
Who are you to say that many people weren't born to be cannabis users, or trippers, etc? Okay, so people born anything but SWM, they get the world handed to them on a platinum platter from now on (especially if they THINK they need to be a different gender to feel good). But people who cannabis makes them complete, they need to still looked down upon?
People "decide" to be Muslim's. Some of those Muslim's "decide" to become Extremists. Then a great many SJW's justify BOTH of them to a fault.
For starters, the word "Marajuana" itself is a derogatory term literally rooted in racism and meant to create stigma against users of cannabis
...
Therefore, if these SJW's are really worth their salt they had better add "marijuana" to their Grammer Shaming agenda list.
originally posted by: SargonThrall
"Okayyy... aside from having nothing to do with anything, somehow homosexual people aren't discriminated against because a couple tv shows have gay scenes? "Hardly a show" that doesn't, do you only get HBO or something?"
You have literally no evidence that the public believes 1 in 5 people is gay, so I'm not going to bother asking for it.
And yet your unsourced chart says that alcohol ranks at 73 'harms', with literally no explanation as to what the parameters for that are? It also doesn't take into account the fact that alcohol is legal and thus more common, nor does it elaborate on the fact that countless people are not harmed whatsoever by alcohol.
According to your chart alcohol is worse than meth. That doesn't even deserve acknowledgement.
Anyone who requires an external substance to feel normal/good is by definition an addict. That should by all means be 'looked down upon'. No one is born to use drugs, and if you had never heard of them you wouldn't have noticed the difference.
Religion is decided by their parents. You can decide as an adult to convert, but no child chooses what to believe. Children are malleable.
You actually admitted that you couldn't provide a single example of what you claimed.
On top of the fact that you complain of the culture of self-victimhood whilst comparing the livelihood of straight-white-males to Jews under Nazi Germany. Pathetically hypocritical, really.
originally posted by: Pinke
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
At least we know Godwin's Law is holding up.