It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: LSU0408
a reply to: Boadicea
The problem isn't the lack of protesting black on black crime. The problem is groups like "Black Lives Matter" not protesting black on black crime when their very name means that black lives matter to them.
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: LSU0408
a reply to: Boadicea
The problem isn't the lack of protesting black on black crime. The problem is groups like "Black Lives Matter" not protesting black on black crime when their very name means that black lives matter to them.
I disagree but here's why. I think, again it's our media showing us only what they want to show us. In this case they want to show us black lives matter protests for whatever reason. But you can't hold Black Lives Matter to the coals for not protest black on black crime, the very begginning of this movement was to protest how minorities where treated by the police. that's it.
It would be like getting upset because a baseball announcer doesn't talk about the football game. It's a whole different issue.
Why Don't Black People Protest 'Black-on-Black Violence'?
I am BTW against blm as an organization, not what they are trying to expose.
originally posted by: LSU0408
originally posted by: amazing
originally posted by: LSU0408
a reply to: Boadicea
The problem isn't the lack of protesting black on black crime. The problem is groups like "Black Lives Matter" not protesting black on black crime when their very name means that black lives matter to them.
I disagree but here's why. I think, again it's our media showing us only what they want to show us. In this case they want to show us black lives matter protests for whatever reason. But you can't hold Black Lives Matter to the coals for not protest black on black crime, the very begginning of this movement was to protest how minorities where treated by the police. that's it.
It would be like getting upset because a baseball announcer doesn't talk about the football game. It's a whole different issue.
It's all about the name in my opinion. For example, there was never a reason to state that all lives matter before black lives matter came along and singled out one group to defend, and then don't defend them unless something happens by the hands of another race. All lives matter by default.
originally posted by: Agartha
a reply to: Boadicea
What a refreshing thread! I've read too many times here or on Facebook that black people should worry about black on black crime, which is worse than police brutality against black people. Well, the statistics show that:
90% of African American homicides are committed by other black people.
82% of Caucasian homicides are committed by other white people.
LINK
There's really no difference. However, in 2015 the rate of black young men killed by police was 5 times higher than black men. LINK
So yes, black people have the right to protest against police brutality based on skin colour.
Thank you for this thread!
It's all about the name. That's all I'm saying. If black lives matter, act like it.
originally posted by: Agartha
originally posted by: TheBulk
What's your missing here is that black people are only 13% of the population....
And yet black men are targeted 5 times more than white men.
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: Boadicea
It's been posted as replies in every thread about black people protesting, there's been threads.
Nice job on all the info gathering.