LIVE: Loretta Lynch to testify on Capital Hill.

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: everyone

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: EternalSolace

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Irishhaf

Hillary is not longer part of the State Dept.

Just a question for those who are currently in, or were in the military...

What would happen to you after your discharge should you transmit, keep, obtain, or share classified information?

Depends on what it is, what you did with it and most importantly, intent.

Intent is irrelevant, you leak secret, top secret and above secret information you will lose clearance at the very least. Intent or no intent.

Leaking information is an intentional act.

Also, Hillary doesn't have a clearance.

So what happened to Hillary's accidental leaking arguments? According to Hillary herself she mishandled classified information out of ignorance. SO you now agree she did it with intent ?

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: EternalSolace

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Irishhaf

Hillary is not longer part of the State Dept.

Just a question for those who are currently in, or were in the military...

What would happen to you after your discharge should you transmit, keep, obtain, or share classified information?

Depends on what it is, what you did with it and most importantly, intent.

For the military side of it I am going to call BS on this answer... I have had long talks with people in the IT department about this... every single person I have spoke with said the same thing... if that was you or I... we would be in Leavenworth.
Intent would have nothing to do with it, since the question was directed at Military, the mauve rocket would send you to the klink before you realized you screwed up.

originally posted by: Jonjonj

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Jonjonj

originally posted by: EternalSolace

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: EternalSolace

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Irishhaf

Hillary is not longer part of the State Dept.

Just a question for those who are currently in, or were in the military...

What would happen to you after your discharge should you transmit, keep, obtain, or share classified information?

and most importantly, intent.

Really? Did you seriously just bring intent into the equation?

Yep, because the law has been reinterpreted in this investigation, it is now ok to use the intent card.

SMH

That's the way it has always been. You an other think the law has been reinterpreted because you know very little about law, precedence and you are more interested in the final outcome. You don't care how you get that outcome as long as you get it.

Lol, just LOL

That about summarizes the depth of understanding I've come to expect.

originally posted by: rexsblues
a reply to: introvert

just stop talking, you're making it worse.

Indeed he is.

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: EternalSolace

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: EternalSolace

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: EternalSolace

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Irishhaf

Hillary is not longer part of the State Dept.

Just a question for those who are currently in, or were in the military...

What would happen to you after your discharge should you transmit, keep, obtain, or share classified information?

and most importantly, intent.

Really? Did you seriously just bring intent into the equation?

Haven't you guys learned anything yet?

Intent is key when deciding degrees of guilt or whether something is criminal in nature that it would even justify charges.

Hahahahahahaha.... There are not enough of the letters "H" and "A" to use in response to that comment. Intent as a justification for breaking the law. Let me know how that goes for you once you've sent a classified email via your new AOL account...

Let me know when you get a better understanding of law.

No where in the law does it say "lack of intent" or "ignorance of law" is an excuse for breaking the law.

So let me know when you've pulled your head out of the sand.

originally posted by: EternalSolace

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: EternalSolace

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: EternalSolace

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: EternalSolace

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Irishhaf

Hillary is not longer part of the State Dept.

Just a question for those who are currently in, or were in the military...

What would happen to you after your discharge should you transmit, keep, obtain, or share classified information?

and most importantly, intent.

Really? Did you seriously just bring intent into the equation?

Haven't you guys learned anything yet?

Intent is key when deciding degrees of guilt or whether something is criminal in nature that it would even justify charges.

Hahahahahahaha.... There are not enough of the letters "H" and "A" to use in response to that comment. Intent as a justification for breaking the law. Let me know how that goes for you once you've sent a classified email via your new AOL account...

Let me know when you get a better understanding of law.

No where in the law does it say "lack of intent" or "ignorance of law" is an excuse for breaking the law.

So let me know when you've pulled your head out of the sand.

It doesn't anywhere. It is the opposite even. Lack of knowledge of the law and rule is never a legal excuse anywhere.

originally posted by: Irishhaf

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: EternalSolace

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Irishhaf

Hillary is not longer part of the State Dept.

Just a question for those who are currently in, or were in the military...

What would happen to you after your discharge should you transmit, keep, obtain, or share classified information?

Depends on what it is, what you did with it and most importantly, intent.

For the military side of it I am going to call BS on this answer... I have had long talks with people in the IT department about this... every single person I have spoke with said the same thing... if that was you or I... we would be in Leavenworth.
Intent would have nothing to do with it, since the question was directed at Military, the mauve rocket would send you to the klink before you realized you screwed up.

I call bull#. 80% of cases similar to this are never taken to court. Those that have been showed specific intent.

And here we go again... I have my whiskey ready for the next shot once this guy from New York gets done...

For EFF SAKE.

Talk about email violence.

This is just pathetic.

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Irishhaf

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: EternalSolace

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Irishhaf

Hillary is not longer part of the State Dept.

Just a question for those who are currently in, or were in the military...

What would happen to you after your discharge should you transmit, keep, obtain, or share classified information?

Depends on what it is, what you did with it and most importantly, intent.

For the military side of it I am going to call BS on this answer... I have had long talks with people in the IT department about this... every single person I have spoke with said the same thing... if that was you or I... we would be in Leavenworth.
Intent would have nothing to do with it, since the question was directed at Military, the mauve rocket would send you to the klink before you realized you screwed up.

I call bull#. 80% of cases similar to this are never taken to court. Those that have been showed specific intent.

Your a smart person... I said in the Military...the UCMJ has other standards and I have seen this done you can call bull all you want... intent is never taken into account unless the volume of Intelligence is to such a degree that they must consider espionage.

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Jonjonj

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Jonjonj

originally posted by: EternalSolace

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: EternalSolace

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Irishhaf

Hillary is not longer part of the State Dept.

Just a question for those who are currently in, or were in the military...

What would happen to you after your discharge should you transmit, keep, obtain, or share classified information?

and most importantly, intent.

Really? Did you seriously just bring intent into the equation?

Yep, because the law has been reinterpreted in this investigation, it is now ok to use the intent card.

SMH

That's the way it has always been. You an other think the law has been reinterpreted because you know very little about law, precedence and you are more interested in the final outcome. You don't care how you get that outcome as long as you get it.

Lol, just LOL

That about summarizes the depth of understanding I've come to expect.

I am sorry but your misplaced sense of superiority is, well...misplaced.

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: EternalSolace

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Irishhaf

Hillary is not longer part of the State Dept.

Just a question for those who are currently in, or were in the military...

What would happen to you after your discharge should you transmit, keep, obtain, or share classified information?

Depends on what it is, what you did with it and most importantly, intent.

If i go out drinking and driving and hit someone i get arrested and at the very least lose my license.

If Hillary Clinton goes out drinking and driving and hits someone she will simply claim that she didn't know there was a law against it and walk away from it with her license.

originally posted by: Jonjonj

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Jonjonj

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Jonjonj

originally posted by: EternalSolace

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: EternalSolace

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Irishhaf

Hillary is not longer part of the State Dept.

Just a question for those who are currently in, or were in the military...

What would happen to you after your discharge should you transmit, keep, obtain, or share classified information?

and most importantly, intent.

Really? Did you seriously just bring intent into the equation?

Yep, because the law has been reinterpreted in this investigation, it is now ok to use the intent card.

SMH

That's the way it has always been. You an other think the law has been reinterpreted because you know very little about law, precedence and you are more interested in the final outcome. You don't care how you get that outcome as long as you get it.

Lol, just LOL

That about summarizes the depth of understanding I've come to expect.

I am sorry but your misplaced sense of superiority is, well...misplaced.

Sure. I'll back out so you can get back to your regularly scheduled circle-jerk.

Stay safe.

originally posted by: tweetie
a reply to: LSU0408

I must have missed that memo!!

That memo was among the 30,000 that Hill deleted.

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Jonjonj

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Jonjonj

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Jonjonj

originally posted by: EternalSolace

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: EternalSolace

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Irishhaf

Hillary is not longer part of the State Dept.

Just a question for those who are currently in, or were in the military...

What would happen to you after your discharge should you transmit, keep, obtain, or share classified information?

and most importantly, intent.

Really? Did you seriously just bring intent into the equation?

Yep, because the law has been reinterpreted in this investigation, it is now ok to use the intent card.

SMH

That's the way it has always been. You an other think the law has been reinterpreted because you know very little about law, precedence and you are more interested in the final outcome. You don't care how you get that outcome as long as you get it.

Lol, just LOL

That about summarizes the depth of understanding I've come to expect.

I am sorry but your misplaced sense of superiority is, well...misplaced.

Sure. I'll back out so you can get back to your regularly scheduled circle-jerk.

Stay safe.

Thank you for your concern, I hope the fact that nobody wanted to "jerk" with you does not cause you undue concern.

Be well.

originally posted by: Irishhaf

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: Irishhaf

originally posted by: introvert

originally posted by: EternalSolace

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Irishhaf

Hillary is not longer part of the State Dept.

Just a question for those who are currently in, or were in the military...

What would happen to you after your discharge should you transmit, keep, obtain, or share classified information?

Depends on what it is, what you did with it and most importantly, intent.

For the military side of it I am going to call BS on this answer... I have had long talks with people in the IT department about this... every single person I have spoke with said the same thing... if that was you or I... we would be in Leavenworth.
Intent would have nothing to do with it, since the question was directed at Military, the mauve rocket would send you to the klink before you realized you screwed up.

I call bull#. 80% of cases similar to this are never taken to court. Those that have been showed specific intent.

Your a smart person...

You're assuming too much.

It's pretty clear your not going to answer any of my questions.!

Yeah people Lynch is obstructing JUSTICE her self.

And so blatantly.

a reply to: neo96
I love that they are getting rude that she is not answering the questions. She is good at stonewalling. HAHAHA

a 30 minute hello people!

She's LYING.

That is a blatant false hood... the UCMJ would ensure the prosecution of the Coastie..

Disgusting that she is so fricking ignorant..