It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: neo96
originally posted by: chrismarco
a reply to: secretboss
More importantly what's the next evolutionary jump going to look like or would we even recognize it?
Evolution is dead.
Take a good look at us right now.
We use science and technology far too much for natural evolution.
The human species as we know it now is all there is ever going to be.
Lol. If you don't think humans can even change the climate on the planet, how the hell do you think humans would be able to halt evolution? Do you even think about these things before you say them?
Every scientific theory starts as a hypothesis. According to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, a hypothesis is an idea that hasn't been proven yet. If enough evidence accumulates to support a hypothesis, it moves to the next step — known as a theory — in the scientific method and becomes accepted as a valid explanation of a phenomenon.
Tanner further explained that a scientific theory is the framework for observations and facts. Theories may change, or the way that they are interpreted may change, but the facts themselves don’t change. Tanner likens theories to a basket in which scientists keep facts and observations that they find. The shape of that basket may change as the scientists learn more and include more facts. "For example, we have ample evidence of traits in populations becoming more or less common over time (evolution), so evolution is a fact but the overarching theories about evolution, the way that we think all of the facts go together might change as new observations of evolution are made," Tanner told Live Science.
The agendas come from the saps trying to discredit evolution because they have trouble thinking long term.
originally posted by: neo96
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: neo96
originally posted by: chrismarco
a reply to: secretboss
More importantly what's the next evolutionary jump going to look like or would we even recognize it?
Evolution is dead.
Take a good look at us right now.
We use science and technology far too much for natural evolution.
The human species as we know it now is all there is ever going to be.
Lol. If you don't think humans can even change the climate on the planet, how the hell do you think humans would be able to halt evolution? Do you even think about these things before you say them?
Not when they are too busy social engineering.
Trying to change the environment to suit their WANTS.
EVOLUTION only occurs when the people ADAPT to their surroundings, and becoming more than they once were.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Krazysh0t
The agendas come from the saps trying to discredit evolution because they have trouble thinking long term.
"Long term" as in infinity? You mean the notion the Universe is infinite (meaning been there forever) and has had pretty much forever to fill with life?.
You also can't see the long (infinite) term, due to your own confirmation bias. You'll been trained your whole life to beginnings and endings...
Stuck in Plato's Cave, right next to all the other "theoreticians"....lulz...
intrptr out.
(For future reference, that means I delete all subsequent inbox replies from this thread without reading them.)
For instance humans are far less hairy than they use to be. We've also gotten taller
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: wheresthebody
Abiogenesis is the origin of life, fun stuff, cool ideas, no one knows for sure. This is where the debate is.
Like religious interpretation, thats an old debate.
But science, like religion, doesn't take to new ideas very well. They don't have proof of origins , focusing on what they call 'life evolved' . You can't have a car without a factory.
originally posted by: intrptr
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: intrptr
It doesn't explain it tho, it just explains what happened after...
They shouldn't use the misleading "exactly what is evolution" then. Origins are a huge hole and why they continue to call it a theory.
originally posted by: neo96
originally posted by: chrismarco
a reply to: secretboss
More importantly what's the next evolutionary jump going to look like or would we even recognize it?
Evolution is dead. Take a good look at us right now. We use science and technology far too much for natural evolution. The human species as we know it now is all there is ever going to be.
Something strange is going on in medicine. Major diseases, like colon cancer, dementia and heart disease, are waning in wealthy countries, and improved diagnosis and treatment cannot fully explain it...it looks as if people in the United States and some other wealthy countries are, unexpectedly, starting to beat back the diseases of aging. The leading killers are still the leading killers -- cancer, heart disease, stroke -- but they are occurring later in life, and people in general are living longer in good health.
The Times cites one researcher's pet theory that the cellular process of aging itself may be gradually changing in humans' favor.
originally posted by: spy66
a reply to: Krazysh0t
For instance humans are far less hairy than they use to be. We've also gotten taller
This made me smile lol. Why dont you stop shaving and cut Your hair for 24 months. I bet you will stick out from the rest of the population.
We have not evolved. Our Tools have and Our preception of Our selves. We are nothing but fools who think we have evolved.
Damn most of you should not even have been alive today of it wasent for Our Tools and Technology.
While we are certainly affecting evolution, it is by no means dead. A good example is medicine, which has allowed people to live who would otherwise have died. This means their genetic traits are more likely to be passed on. Most people would intuit that this is a bad thing because traits that would have killed us are allowed to remain, but there is no reason to believe such a fact is all negative
originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: schuyler
While we are certainly affecting evolution, it is by no means dead. A good example is medicine, which has allowed people to live who would otherwise have died. This means their genetic traits are more likely to be passed on. Most people would intuit that this is a bad thing because traits that would have killed us are allowed to remain, but there is no reason to believe such a fact is all negative
That isn't an improvement.
IT only means passing on 'bad' genetic traits.
Pre technology the pool would have become stronger.
originally posted by: spy66
a reply to: Krazysh0t
For instance humans are far less hairy than they use to be. We've also gotten taller
This made me smile lol. Why dont you stop shaving and cut Your hair for 24 months. I bet you will stick out from the rest of the population.
We have not evolved. Our Tools have and Our preception of Our selves. We are nothing but fools who think we have evolved.
Damn most of you should not even have been alive today of it wasent for Our Tools and Technology.