It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
Yeah, because climbing on top of trucks and trying to break windows is exercising their rights. Dragging an innocent truck driver out and beating him so badly that people still think he died is exercising their rights. Throwing rocks at trucks is their right.
But no, it's safer to sit there and call us cowards isn't it.
originally posted by: Aristotelian1
They don't have to. You're the one that made the claim that the protesters would be willing and able to let through emergency vehicles. The burden of proof is on you.
originally posted by: ~Lucidity
originally posted by: nobunaga
a reply to: ~Lucidity
no actually they block ambulances and emergency vehicles all the time. they dont let them through, fool.
Prove it.
originally posted by: nobunaga
heres precedent....
originally posted by: nobunaga
a reply to: ~Lucidity
so when they block a bridge with one way on or off, or the thruway in oakland, with no way around...
BLM always blocks traffic both ways, with no listed detours, or advance notice that your travel route is blocked by a bunch of ignorant protesters
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: ~Lucidity
Trucks are confined to specific routes for a reason. In some of these places there are no detours they can use. They end up with nowhere to go.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
So the protest in Memphis on I40 was 25 years ago and was a riot? Because they were climbing all over trucks there. And those trucks had nowhere to go.