AR-15's are NOT designed to kill

a reply to: madmac5150
Middlin'
180 grain

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: cavtrooper7

AR rifles have grown immensely in popularity, and with good reason. These light-recoiling, durable semiautos make sense not only for military and law enforcement applications, but also for self-defense, competition and target shooting. ARs also make excellent hunting rifles, and there are a growing number of hunters who rely on their ARs to put meat in the freezer.

www.northamericanwhitetail.com...

Yet every hunter in 'mountain men' uses a large calibre rifle, Eustace even uses a flintlock! I admit Kyle's son used a small calibre rifle for rabbits, as a large calibre would blow the bunny apart.

a reply to: pikestaff
3030 is pretty good
308 is better.
3006. Yeah, that's the one.

I am a "Mountaineer"... born and bred.

We have a 12 ga. shotgun (and I am really good with it)...

We also have 2 Belgians...

I'd worry about the Belgians.....

a reply to: madmac5150

Slugs?
00 shot?
Rock salt?

a reply to: Phage

Combat load.

00 Buck/1 oz rifled slug/alternating

and #4buckshot magnum loads for big cats/coyotes/wolves

a reply to: madmac5150

Very practical.

originally posted by: 00018GE
I get tired of hearing the news media talking heads saying that AR-15's are designed to kill. AR-15's and the like AND military rounds in general are designed to wound NOT kill. Wounding an enemy soldier takes more soldiers off the battlefield than killing enemy soldiers. These kinds of weapons are designed to wound. I don't understand why no one calls them on this more often.

This is, quite possibly, the stupidest post I have ever seen in my entire life. No. It's a gun. It kills people. That's the point.

originally posted by: AngryCymraeg

originally posted by: 00018GE
I get tired of hearing the news media talking heads saying that AR-15's are designed to kill. AR-15's and the like AND military rounds in general are designed to wound NOT kill. Wounding an enemy soldier takes more soldiers off the battlefield than killing enemy soldiers. These kinds of weapons are designed to wound. I don't understand why no one calls them on this more often.

This is, quite possibly, the stupidest post I have ever seen in my entire life. No. It's a gun. It kills people. That's the point.

What the hell is wrong with you, guns were clearly designed for fishing

originally posted by: AngryCymraeg

originally posted by: 00018GE
I get tired of hearing the news media talking heads saying that AR-15's are designed to kill. AR-15's and the like AND military rounds in general are designed to wound NOT kill. Wounding an enemy soldier takes more soldiers off the battlefield than killing enemy soldiers. These kinds of weapons are designed to wound. I don't understand why no one calls them on this more often.

This is, quite possibly, the stupidest post I have ever seen in my entire life. No. It's a gun. It kills people. That's the point.

The AR-15 sucks. Yes, it kills people, but a .22 LR could have done the job far more efficiently. Hell, my dogs are more lethal than an AR-15. Are we gonna ban dogs now?

a reply to: madmac5150

Only pitbulls. 'cuz they are evil. Everyone knows that.

to bottom line it,we will maintain our rifles to fight our government when we face tyranny.
THAT line hasn't been drawn yet ,we wait.
The enemy must hit first,then they get dissected.
THOSE who don't fight,haven't served or even SHOT a rifle are not permitted to enforce their wishes to do so as we have informed you ALL infinitum...GAD some of these civilians are thick...

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: madmac5150

Only pitbulls. 'cuz they are evil. Everyone knows that.

LOL!!

a reply to: cavtrooper7

OORAH!

Oh, wait. I'm a civilian. Not allowed to say that. Nevermind.

originally posted by: madmac5150

originally posted by: AngryCymraeg

originally posted by: 00018GE
I get tired of hearing the news media talking heads saying that AR-15's are designed to kill. AR-15's and the like AND military rounds in general are designed to wound NOT kill. Wounding an enemy soldier takes more soldiers off the battlefield than killing enemy soldiers. These kinds of weapons are designed to wound. I don't understand why no one calls them on this more often.

This is, quite possibly, the stupidest post I have ever seen in my entire life. No. It's a gun. It kills people. That's the point.

The AR-15 sucks. Yes, it kills people, but a .22 LR could have done the job far more efficiently. Hell, my dogs are more lethal than an AR-15. Are we gonna ban dogs now?

Really !! Maybe Bryant should have used dogs instead of an AR15 at port Arthur

I know and understand that we are on the precipice... but I am an old military guy that has a little piece of land, and I would really just rather be left alone. I have my ducks, my chickens and I am happy.

If you would like to infringe on my happiness, you can deal with my Belgians.

a reply to: Phage

Say what you want,if they bitch your freedom was already paid for ,as has been so for my GUN COLLECTION,however intellect from reading doesn't equate often to experience.
In the case of some who are connected to their cellphones...Epsilons at best,here.

originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

originally posted by: madmac5150

originally posted by: AngryCymraeg

originally posted by: 00018GE
I get tired of hearing the news media talking heads saying that AR-15's are designed to kill. AR-15's and the like AND military rounds in general are designed to wound NOT kill. Wounding an enemy soldier takes more soldiers off the battlefield than killing enemy soldiers. These kinds of weapons are designed to wound. I don't understand why no one calls them on this more often.

This is, quite possibly, the stupidest post I have ever seen in my entire life. No. It's a gun. It kills people. That's the point.

Which tells me that you know NOTHING of firearms... and you have never met a shooter

The AR-15 sucks. Yes, it kills people, but a .22 LR could have done the job far more efficiently. Hell, my dogs are more lethal than an AR-15. Are we gonna ban dogs now?

Really !! Maybe Bryant should have used dogs instead of an AR15 at port Arthur

a reply to: cavtrooper7
My cellphone is of the flip variety and it lives in the console of my truck.

I gave my guns (a 16ga and a 3030) to my brother in law because I have no use for them.

a reply to: madmac5150

Port Arthur:A guy in Austrailia who shot some people scared them JUST like a school scared the UK into giving up semi auto hi cap fire arms