Social Engineering: Proof That Media Exposure Can Warp Gender Identity In Adult Men

originally posted by: TechniXcality
a reply to: Annee

hey that's actually some good work.. Oh # im screwed now..

So what are you afraid of? The guy met up with his friends and handed out fruit snacks. Plus, these aren't transgenders. Are you trying to take away the freedom for people to watch the shows they choose to watch?

a reply to: Annee

I've debated, observed the Atheists over the years. Pnn & Teller (friends of the South Park guys) went on record against them dissing them based on them not espousing Atheist viewpoints (there being NO god) in an episode. I love South Park for not merely dissing Atheism (which so many expected they MUST have been [which I knew better]), but because they also did an episode ripping on Agnosticism.

My chronicle I went and wrote and posted, it isnt PROPER Agnosticism (it doesnt claim to be), its my own 'all new' form of philosophical derivative, which I've been mostly quiet about yet staunchly practicing for a decade. My own innovation (what do you got outside of your group affiliation?).

To downplay it with total disregard / disrespect it only demonstrates your bigotry in pursuit of your agenda.

a reply to: Annee

I've debated, observed the Atheists over the years. Pnn & Teller (friends of the South Park guys) went on record against them dissing them based on them not espousing Atheist viewpoints (there being NO god) in an episode. I love South Park for not merely dissing Atheism (which so many expected they MUST have been [which I knew better]), but because they also did an episode ripping on Agnosticism.

My chronicle I went and wrote and posted, it isnt PROPER Agnosticism (it doesnt claim to be), its my own 'all new' form of philosophical derivative, which I've been mostly quiet about yet staunchly practicing for a decade. My own innovation (what do you got outside of your group affiliation?).

To downplay it with total disregard / disrespect it only demonstrates your bigotry in pursuit of your agenda.

To disrespect my manifesto of individuality, just proves how hollow and fake your entire existence obviously always was.

site double post

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: Annee



To disrespect my manifesto of individuality, just proves how hollow and fake your entire existence obviously always was.

What in the hell why are you talking to annee like that? and your "manifesto" have you ever heard the term "manic" if not you might want to research mania, im really kind of concerned about you. Also this notion of MLP turning people trans is silly, did someone turn you heterosexual, or force you to assume a male gender?

This total social group dominance creature you were supposedly against, out of respect for "her" request, I went to a lot of trouble tonight posting for the first time my manifesto of individuality... as specifically requested.

Yet despite this, this "social justice warrior" completely disrespected my every intention, my every being as an individual.

Thus exposing how fake as an individual "she" is. And how bigoted "her" agenda is (its all about social justice, as long as you're like "she" is).

And how sweet the irony, you, the military thug likewise lacking true self-individuality, could never any time soon ever hope to understand my viewpoint, is now taking sides with your "enemy".

Actually read my heartfelt piece. In there I'm very specific how both the Republican AND Democratic Parties, more directly, likewise, both the liberal AND conservative philosophies, are all about power dominance methods. It's why you're such perfect polar opposites; its why when backed into a corner you always end up on the same side (vs. Ron Paul, vs. me, etc).

You can never understand, at least not any time soon. You're both social group power structure minions (whether you know it or not). I wont hate you for that. But both of you hate me (go ahead, deny it lol), and I dont care. I speak truth to POWER (which you both wield unjust forms as your point of existence in this site, as far as I've seen so far). Me, I just stand up for the weak, the innocent, and for that, to you people, I'm the monster.

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Im no fan of hers either but wtf did I just read my eyeballs are still spinning

a reply to: khnum

Okay, its way late, I probably needed to go to bed a while ago, but note one is a Neoliberal, while the other is a Neoconservative. I've delt with both of these individuals before, across multiple threads.

Tonight I took offense to an insult on my specific "manifesto of individuality" (as requested, from a social group appealing demagogue anti-individual queen). This following multiple personal attacks / insults from both persons (which from each, accusations of being their polar opposites have more or less been a theme)...

And following the content of my piece of anti-social group tyranny tonight, for which I was insulted, and then dude jumped in on the side of his usual "enemy" (this being a war mongering imperialist no less), hey I snapped.

They already hated me. I already didn't care. He's willing to blow up babies for the imperial ambitions of our deceitful politicians. She's willing to propagandize an entire generation into being sniveling sissies too afraid to take on the real world, let alone to fight to defend their own.

And this is all the norm these days.

It makes me sick.

Especially when I, the defender of all children against all tyranny, am cast as some lunatic retard (across numerous threads, across numerous pages) from these two, for entirely different reasons (yet both involved protecting the children of the world from their sociopathic ilk), for standing up against any and all mass scale smart weapon wielding vs. helpless children bullies.

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

I will let you in on the joke Hillary being owned by the Saudis is a neocon,project for the new American century wrapped in a Democrat coating.As for the children if you survive planned parenthood and abortion your going to be vaccinated with something that might give you autism and be sexually confused by the time your 8 and leave high school with 12 year old reading and mathematics skills if your lucky.

I in all conscience could not bring a child into the world at this time and if I did it would be homeschooled and raised off the grid.Your nation is a nation divided and I would not be surprised if by the end of this election cycle that it will fall apart.You cant save the world and it doesnt want to be saved,good men did nothing now we get what we deserve...look after those you love and care about and forget the bigger picture we have crossed the threshold.

a reply to: Bluesma

Only in secret because it kinda sounds children of the corn going on... as you said as society moves towards the freedom it is gauranteed and backed by the government that is meant to represent freedom and not just special interest groups so majority minority doesnt matter when its rights of individuals making up the whole regardless of group.. if its that sort of government of course, and as freedom begins to move out of corruption of groups and onto the individual as it should be then people are freer to be themselves without hiding and playing halloween of expectation in who they are or present to the public.

That of course obviously means these eople were already that to begin with, so nothing really changes excet the school uniforms of expectation are dropped.

Of course the only ones complaining about it are the ones expecting others to live or be how they idealistically picture or want them to be because ouch my feelings or eyes or belief or whatever...

... and bronies etc. are supposed to be the sensitive ones?

No irony intended but the only people that are whinning are the sensitive ones, everyone else is in a fight a battle for what? The rights and freedoms they are garunteed to already have but dont.

So whos the whinny baby again? The facist looking to pacify when they need a pacifier themselves called self control not other control, then maybe theyll grow up even if 90 years old and havent.

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

I really don't see the connection. Maybe it is because I am not fully awake yet but I don't see what trans has to do with bronies has to do with manipulation by media.

a reply to: sputniksteve

Sound awake to me, making connections that dont exist or loosely do is concept ladder on concept ladder and not reality.

The OP has tried to link transgender to a TV show as programming all who watch it to be transgendered as a conspiracy as to why its in the news and we are seeing more of it... than the reality that freedom has been expanded to allow it which shouldnt have been controlled under the constitution to begin with but was controlled because of ideological special interest groups that wanted conformity to an ideal that started in Italy under Stalinism and has tried to find a home everywhere it can since WW2 of course America being free? It was easy to hop in and hide, then surface as other things like a wolf in sheeps clothing.

It veils itself as rhetoric and agenda when it is simly control and fascism to an ideal or agenda without any acceptance to others ways of thinking or life in the name of ultra nationalism and conformity of the masses to homogenize as one army to fight and conquer in expansion and domination.

They feed on peoples insecurities, of youre not good enough, smart enough, or pretty enough, rich enough and other unattainable ideals except when one has self acceptance that says F you yes I am no matter who thinks it and you are too so stop playing, pandering and pretending we arent, thinking oneself superior or better than anyone else in these concepts made to control and subject others to that control in authoritarian heiarchy where you must climb to somewhere anyway it takes and either lick boot or kiss ass all the way there.

Its BS and two wars were fought over it for a reason.

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
You all act like transgenderism is some SPECIFIC thing, which it is not.

Actually it is.

Going by the ATS proponents words themselves its the ultimate enigma. It isn't any one singular thing.

And about the only one singular defining thing I've observed them as embracing the the entirely unproven / unprovable supposed genetic link.

Therefore they wont accept what happens in this thread, but it doesn't mean none of it is true or relevant.

Your definition of 'transgender' appears to be "stuff that personally weirds me out" and you feel all of it is somehow malevolently connected.

IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Especially when I, the defender of all children against all tyranny...

Dude...

Is that really how you see yourself? The Defender Of All Children Against Tyranny? Talk about an inflated ego... I recommend taking a step back and reevaluating your perspective because this sort of self righteous fatuousness is unhealthy for all involved.

originally posted by: mbkennel

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
You all act like transgenderism is some SPECIFIC thing, which it is not.

Actually it is.

NOPE.

Transgender people are people who experience a mismatch between their gender identity, or gender expression, and their assigned sex.[1][2][3] Transgender people are sometimes called transsexual if they desire medical assistance to transition from one sex to another. Transgender is also an umbrella term: in addition to including people whose gender identity is the opposite of their assigned sex (trans men and trans women), it may include people who are not exclusively masculine or feminine (people who are genderqueer, e.g. bigender, pangender, genderfluid, or agender).[2][4][5] Other definitions of transgender also include people who belong to a third gender, or conceptualize transgender people as a third gender.[6][7] Infrequently, the term transgender is defined very broadly to include cross-dressers.
en.wikipedia.org...

That looks like of spectrum if I've ever seen one.

a reply to: CagliostroTheGreat

I wouldn't have ever even clicked on any of these articles / threads had the elementary schools not been on their uncompromising list of targets.

IgnoranceIsntBlisss



Okay. It's your fantasy, who am I to judge? God Speed, O Defender of Children Against Tyranny. ✌🍺

a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

wow, I didn't know there was such a huge movement. One of my social media friends one day, in which we were talking about nothing in particular, just blurted out "what do you guys think of my little ponies?" Since then, it seems that subject keeps coming up, he just blurts it out "that show is fantastic etc". We were quiet, no one said a thing, at first. We have noticed that he is more and more absent from our group thou.

originally posted by: Bluesma
...
There is the possibility that people are feeling more free in general... but that is why I mentioned no women seem to be feeling more free to cross dress. I am the probably the only woman in this town I have seen step out at the store wearing my jeans, button down shirt, roper boots, and occasionally, spurs- all filthy because I've been working with the horses.
That tends to shock people and I have been openly laughed at.

That's because you are in France. I suspect that even in the north you would be received in the same manner. Some people would just stare, while others laugh at you. After all, French people are known for their apprehension of "the cowboy culture".

originally posted by: Bluesma
Again, this is South France! The country still does not allow gay marriage, gay adoption of children, or surrogate mothers. I haven't seen any big changes in attitude in the last 24 years- and certainly not out back in this rural area!

Wait... are you sure you are in socialist "France"?