Goldman Sachs is sponsoring a Scientology-based jail ‘re-education’ program

a reply to: TerryDon79

Scientology is really like a combination of Crowlian Magick intertwined with the fictitious tales of H P Lovecraft. And a lot of concepts about life & reincarnation are just reboots of Ancient Hindu & Buddhist teachings, throw in a little bit of Crowley, charge a cover and Alakazam! There you have Scientology.

originally posted by: ColdWisdom
a reply to: TerryDon79

Scientology is really like a combination of Crowlian Magick intertwined with the fictitious tales of H P Lovecraft. And a lot of concepts about life & reincarnation are just reboots of Ancient Hindu & Buddhist teachings, throw in a little bit of Crowley, charge a cover and Alakazam! There you have Scientology.

I was trying to be short and sweet, but you just described it perfectly.

a reply to: SpecialSauce
OK doctors over prescribing....that's common knowledge. Scientology did not expose that.

ECT is a very old method only used in extreme cases. They did not expose it's shortfalls. ..that became common knowledge after years of research, not a scientology discovery.

With regards with schizophrenia drugs, don't be silly. They never did a blood test? Maybe because you display all the textbook symptoms?
I did ask your mental state to which you replied none.

Mass killers on antidepressants.....lmao. of course they are. They have been diagnosed with mental issues thus prescribed. Mental issues are the reason for the mass killings, not the drugs.

I'm dissapointed you can't think objectively about those points.

originally posted by: GemmyMcGemJew
a reply to: SpecialSauce
OK doctors over prescribing....that's common knowledge. Scientology did not expose that.

ECT is a very old method only used in extreme cases. They did not expose it's shortfalls. ..that became common knowledge after years of research, not a scientology discovery.

With regards with schizophrenia drugs, don't be silly. They never did a blood test? Maybe because you display all the textbook symptoms?
I did ask your mental state to which you replied none.

Mass killers on antidepressants.....lmao. of course they are. They have been diagnosed with mental issues thus prescribed. Mental issues are the reason for the mass killings, not the drugs.

I'm dissapointed you can't think objectively about those points.

I don't find mass killers being on antidepressants funny. Is Adam Lanza amusing to you? www.cchrint.org...

a reply to: SpecialSauce

I don't find scientologists funny either.

Killing, rape, abduction, unlawful inprisonment, extortion and a whole list of other things.

Such a nice religion.

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: SpecialSauce

I don't find scientologists funny either.

Killing, rape, abduction, unlawful inprisonment, extortion and a whole list of other things.

Such a nice religion.

Has any of that ever been proven in criminal court?

originally posted by: SpecialSauce

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: SpecialSauce

I don't find scientologists funny either.

Killing, rape, abduction, unlawful inprisonment, extortion and a whole list of other things.

Such a nice religion.

Has any of that ever been proven in criminal court?

Yes, there have been convictions.

Double post

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: SpecialSauce

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: SpecialSauce

I don't find scientologists funny either.

Killing, rape, abduction, unlawful inprisonment, extortion and a whole list of other things.

Such a nice religion.

Has any of that ever been proven in criminal court?

Yes, there have been convictions.

Link one please. I read charles Manson supposedly read Dianetics but he was never part of the church or a member.

a reply to: SpecialSauce

I'll do better than that. I'll link to a site that has a few.

Link

a reply to: TerryDon79

I'd also like to add that all lot of charges bought against Scientology are settled outside of court.

Jennifer Stewart for example. Charges were rape and settled outside of court for $700,000. Yet Scientology says there was no wrong doing. Why pay if the charges weren't true?

a reply to: SpecialSauce
OK il leave you be. Clearly difficult to debate with, the fact you think I'm mocking mass murderers. It's pretty clear I was laughing at your inability to link mass murderers with mental issues.

a reply to: TerryDon79

Manson, of course. 1 guy who isn't exactly known for being truthful or a reliable witness claims he read the book. A guy with a swastika on his forehead, you are aware Hubbard fought in ww2 right?

Silly ole me, I disregarded Manson's many "truths" as drug inspired rantings. I wasn't smart like you and got to know what really went down. I shoulda been listening to what Manson had to say huh?

Hell you think he's so truthful and important you'd be writing down what he said wouldn't you? Publish it on the internet? That sound reasonable to you?

a reply to: SpecialSauce

So you dismiss all of the CONVICTIONS?

Poor scientologist who can't accept PROOF that Scientology is nothing but a cult and have had people convicted of crimes.

ETA: You do realise that there are links within that page to the convictions themselves, right? Or did your space God on a plane tell you they were false?

Am I the only one who thinks its hilarious that the people attacking the OP claim not to be members of Scientology, but just so happen to be experts on Scientology and how it "really" works.

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: SpecialSauce

So you dismiss all of the CONVICTIONS?

Poor scientologist who can't accept PROOF that Scientology is nothing but a cult and have had people convicted of crimes.

Just out of curiosity. What's your definition of a "cult?"

originally posted by: Aristotelian1

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: SpecialSauce

So you dismiss all of the CONVICTIONS?

Poor scientologist who can't accept PROOF that Scientology is nothing but a cult and have had people convicted of crimes.

Just out of curiosity. What's your definition of a "cult?"

Just out of curiosity, why do you defend a cult with criminal convictions?

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: Aristotelian1

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: SpecialSauce

So you dismiss all of the CONVICTIONS?

Poor scientologist who can't accept PROOF that Scientology is nothing but a cult and have had people convicted of crimes.

Just out of curiosity. What's your definition of a "cult?"

Just out of curiosity, why do you defend a cult with criminal convictions?

Not going to answer the question?

originally posted by: Aristotelian1

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: Aristotelian1

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: SpecialSauce

So you dismiss all of the CONVICTIONS?

Poor scientologist who can't accept PROOF that Scientology is nothing but a cult and have had people convicted of crimes.

Just out of curiosity. What's your definition of a "cult?"

Just out of curiosity, why do you defend a cult with criminal convictions?

Not going to answer the question?

I would, but you don't believe the dictionary, so there's no point.

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: Aristotelian1

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: Aristotelian1

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: SpecialSauce

So you dismiss all of the CONVICTIONS?

Poor scientologist who can't accept PROOF that Scientology is nothing but a cult and have had people convicted of crimes.

Just out of curiosity. What's your definition of a "cult?"

Just out of curiosity, why do you defend a cult with criminal convictions?

Not going to answer the question?

I would, but you don't believe the dictionary, so there's no point.

I NEVER agree with the dictionary? How do you know this?