It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: cenpuppie
Folks sure are adamant on the non existence of these Aryans. It was made up or misinterpreted by people back then because well, racism
originally posted by: Byrd
The source material for the original web page pointed to in the OP is full of "channelled" information and things from the 1500's that are known to be incorrect.
originally posted by: LABTECH767
a reply to: zinc12
They are not the Aryan's of the Nazi ideological mythology however and are more closely related to the Slavic races such as the Russian's and even the Pole's, the Aryan's (Arya's) of India also have NO proven link and they were of course the real Aryan's from whom the term is derived while the Arya's/Aryan's were probably only one of many race's and tribe's that had similar and divergant characteristic's.
I read a long time ago now, the Nordic races of Western Europe where back in the 1990's thought to have a distinct lineage about 40.000 years old and the Gaelic speaking races (usually known as celt's though that is a misnomer as Celt was a culture not a race and is throught to have originated in southern Germany south of the rhine
with no link to the Thule (whom were a siberian race and are believed to be the ancestor's of the Inuit among others))
Also the whole Aryan myth is perhaps just that and at best a controversial theory riddled with racist propeganda going back to those whom wished to paint the white race as superior to all other's when in fact a human is a human is a human and culture+religion play's a far more important role in shaping our nation's than race ever did.
originally posted by: cenpuppie
Folks sure are adamant on the non existence of these Aryans. It was made up or misinterpreted by people back then because well, racism
"The Aryas ('the noble ones') are said in the Avesta to have had their original home in the fair land of Airyana-Vaeja (the Cradle-land of the Aryas), which had been 'the first among the lands' created by Mazda. It was at the centre of the Earth and in its very centre stood the mountain Hara-bareza ('Alborz')."
In the ancient Indian language of Sanskrit, swastika means "well-being". The symbol has been used by Hindus, Buddhists and Jains for millennia and is commonly assumed to be an Indian sign.
The irony is that the swastika is more European in origin than most people realise. Archaeological finds have long demonstrated that the swastika is a very old symbol, but ancient examples are by no means limited to India. It was used by the Ancient Greeks, Celts, and Anglo-Saxons and some of the oldest examples have been found in Eastern Europe, from the Baltic to the Balkans .
Among the museum's most highly prized treasures is a small ivory figurine of a female bird. Made from the tusk of a mammoth, it was found in 1908 at the Palaeolithic settlement of Mezin near the Russian border.
On the torso of the bird is engraved an intricate meander pattern of joined up swastikas. It's the oldest identified swastika pattern in the world and has been radio carbon-dated to an astonishing 15,000 years ago. The bird was found with a number of phallic objects which supports the idea that the swastika pattern was used as a fertility symbol.
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: zinc12
You mean all Indo_European mythology's place their homeland around the axial mountain, I know that's because they are all remembering the same history.
Since when were the Hebrews, Tibetans, and Navajo Indo-Europeans?
Tibet has heavy Indian influence and India has heavy Aryan Influence.
Hebrews have taken much of their religious text from Zoroastrian text and the Zoroastrians call there ancestors Aryans
Navajo, have story's other races existing with them in antiquity and if I remember correctly there is also genetic proof of that.