Which came first dinosaur or the egg

a reply to: ssenerawa

There are no bad questions unless it's geared towards creating confusion or missinformation about evolution and science.
All evidence points to a nested higharc showing decent with modification in populations. The fossal records show this with zero exceptions. No one creature ever just appears as is like a rabbits out of a hat. We all have decended from a common ancestor.

a reply to: ssenerawa

Care to prove that he is delusional? OR is this just going to be a "I shout louder therefor I won" kind of thread ?

originally posted by: Raggedyman

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: Lysergic
a reply to: ssenerawa

You believe you said, so you do, or do not believe it's true?

When I believe something, I believe it to be true, and I believe we are through.

I mean whats left to be said?

It's 2016.


There, that should cover it.

its more like when someone's being irrational with you and then you're like ok yeah you right whatever

Some people on ats have emotional issues,mother get their Knickers and n a twist if you question their religious beliefs on evolution, but f you dare questioning anything related to evolution

They don't have answers so they just attack the issue, the person and anything related

My take, the chicken was created by God to lay eggs, hence chickens before egg
That or the chickens evolved into dinosaurs kinda looks key man came from monkeys who as evolution has it once laid eggs as well, see the monkeys can understand have come from chickens as well, we don't have any evidence to disprove that chickens didn't evolve to monkeys just yet

Have fun, beware atheist fundamentalists, they tend to go off like a prawn n the sun around here

Hats off to you bro. Thanks for staying on topic, being kind, and giving feedback related to my OP. I almost was about to give up on the post. Didn't no a conspiracy site has such close minded individuals.

originally posted by: flyingfish
a reply to: ssenerawa

There are no bad questions unless it's geared towards creating confusion or missinformation about evolution and science.
All evidence points to a nested higharc showing decent with modification in populations. The fossal records show this with zero exceptions. No one creature ever just appears as is like a rabbits out of a hat. We all have decended from a common ancestor.

Yes I agree, but I believe That each creature derives from their own unique ancestor DNA sequence, not the same one. As in different specie of humans, giraffes and parrots didn't come from a common ancestor. Also it takes woman to create man, logically speaking I believe the woman somehow came first, then the man, if they are not biologically related they could produce young but still definitely not an entire civilization, and if he happened to be the son that wouldn't work either? So what happened? We also know that that if different speci produce, when the child is born DNA slaps it in the face with a guarantee that it'll never re-produce.

originally posted by: mysterioustranger
a reply to: ssenerawa

Easy. The dinosaur. It already exists. Whereas the egg is just an egg which may or maybe not hatch.

But the dinosaur is already alive.*

*same goes for chicken

But how could it already be alive with nothing to birth it

originally posted by: Barcs
The chicken or egg thing is meant to be a philosophical debate. But the only true answer is that neither came first. They came together from a previous ancestor. Evolution is about changes in a population. Basically, there was some evolutionary advantage to having a hard external egg, rather than an internal one. Whatever it was, it helped the population breed more effectively, so after that particular mutation, the trait spread all across the species.

You will never trace it back to a single creature or a single egg and say, "aha! That's what started it all!". That is kind of a creationist mindset, looking back to a single individual or egg as the beginning of that entire genetic line with no previous ancestors or parents.

Ok, so neither the internal or external egg came first is what you're saying? And the the animals environment made it change the way it gave birth?

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: mysterioustranger
a reply to: ssenerawa

Easy. The dinosaur. It already exists. Whereas the egg is just an egg which may or maybe not hatch.

But the dinosaur is already alive.*

*same goes for chicken

But how could it already be alive with nothing to birth it

Easy.

A non dinosaur ancestor.

Try studying evolution before you try and pick holes in it.

So a non dinosaur birth a dinosaur? Why do people think a different species of animal grew into another? They were always different. A DNA sequence is never going to alter just because a creature needs it to

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: mysterioustranger
a reply to: ssenerawa

Easy. The dinosaur. It already exists. Whereas the egg is just an egg which may or maybe not hatch.

But the dinosaur is already alive.*

*same goes for chicken

But how could it already be alive with nothing to birth it

Easy.

A non dinosaur ancestor.

Try studying evolution before you try and pick holes in it.

So a non dinosaur birth a dinosaur?

No.

A parrot made them.

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: mysterioustranger
a reply to: ssenerawa

Easy. The dinosaur. It already exists. Whereas the egg is just an egg which may or maybe not hatch.

But the dinosaur is already alive.*

*same goes for chicken

But how could it already be alive with nothing to birth it

Easy.

A non dinosaur ancestor.

Try studying evolution before you try and pick holes in it.

So a non dinosaur birth a dinosaur?

No.

A parrot made them.

So why can't a parrot make a dinosaur now

a reply to: ssenerawa

Prove it.

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: mysterioustranger
a reply to: ssenerawa

Easy. The dinosaur. It already exists. Whereas the egg is just an egg which may or maybe not hatch.

But the dinosaur is already alive.*

*same goes for chicken

But how could it already be alive with nothing to birth it

Easy.

A non dinosaur ancestor.

Try studying evolution before you try and pick holes in it.

So a non dinosaur birth a dinosaur?

No.

A parrot made them.

So why can't a parrot make a dinosaur now

Because they don't want to.

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: mysterioustranger
a reply to: ssenerawa

Easy. The dinosaur. It already exists. Whereas the egg is just an egg which may or maybe not hatch.

But the dinosaur is already alive.*

*same goes for chicken

But how could it already be alive with nothing to birth it

Easy.

A non dinosaur ancestor.

Try studying evolution before you try and pick holes in it.

So a non dinosaur birth a dinosaur?

No.

A parrot made them.

So why can't a parrot make a dinosaur now

Because they don't want to.

Or because it's impossible

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: mysterioustranger
a reply to: ssenerawa

Easy. The dinosaur. It already exists. Whereas the egg is just an egg which may or maybe not hatch.

But the dinosaur is already alive.*

*same goes for chicken

But how could it already be alive with nothing to birth it

Easy.

A non dinosaur ancestor.

Try studying evolution before you try and pick holes in it.

So a non dinosaur birth a dinosaur?

No.

A parrot made them.

So why can't a parrot make a dinosaur now

Because they don't want to.

Or because it's impossible

Or maybe it's not and parrots just got fed up with making them?

Maybe it wasn't a parrot. Maybe they were made by squirrels.

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: mysterioustranger
a reply to: ssenerawa

Easy. The dinosaur. It already exists. Whereas the egg is just an egg which may or maybe not hatch.

But the dinosaur is already alive.*

*same goes for chicken

But how could it already be alive with nothing to birth it

Easy.

A non dinosaur ancestor.

Try studying evolution before you try and pick holes in it.

So a non dinosaur birth a dinosaur?

No.

A parrot made them.

So why can't a parrot make a dinosaur now

Because they don't want to.

Or because it's impossible

Or maybe it's not and parrots just got fed up with making them?

Maybe it wasn't a parrot. Maybe they were made by squirrels.

Or maybe I want two of whatever drug you're on

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: mysterioustranger
a reply to: ssenerawa

Easy. The dinosaur. It already exists. Whereas the egg is just an egg which may or maybe not hatch.

But the dinosaur is already alive.*

*same goes for chicken

But how could it already be alive with nothing to birth it

Easy.

A non dinosaur ancestor.

Try studying evolution before you try and pick holes in it.

So a non dinosaur birth a dinosaur?

No.

A parrot made them.

So why can't a parrot make a dinosaur now

Because they don't want to.

Or because it's impossible

Or maybe it's not and parrots just got fed up with making them?

Maybe it wasn't a parrot. Maybe they were made by squirrels.

Or maybe I want two of whatever drug you're on

You've got your bearded idiot in the sky. That dude makes you think enough stupid things without the need for any extras.

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: mysterioustranger
a reply to: ssenerawa

Easy. The dinosaur. It already exists. Whereas the egg is just an egg which may or maybe not hatch.

But the dinosaur is already alive.*

*same goes for chicken

But how could it already be alive with nothing to birth it

Easy.

A non dinosaur ancestor.

Try studying evolution before you try and pick holes in it.

So a non dinosaur birth a dinosaur?

No.

A parrot made them.

So why can't a parrot make a dinosaur now

Because they don't want to.

Or because it's impossible

Or maybe it's not and parrots just got fed up with making them?

Maybe it wasn't a parrot. Maybe they were made by squirrels.

Or maybe I want two of whatever drug you're on

You've got your bearded idiot in the sky. That dude makes you think enough stupid things without the need for any extras.

what?

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: mysterioustranger
a reply to: ssenerawa

Easy. The dinosaur. It already exists. Whereas the egg is just an egg which may or maybe not hatch.

But the dinosaur is already alive.*

*same goes for chicken

But how could it already be alive with nothing to birth it

Easy.

A non dinosaur ancestor.

Try studying evolution before you try and pick holes in it.

So a non dinosaur birth a dinosaur?

No.

A parrot made them.

So why can't a parrot make a dinosaur now

Because they don't want to.

Or because it's impossible

Or maybe it's not and parrots just got fed up with making them?

Maybe it wasn't a parrot. Maybe they were made by squirrels.

Or maybe I want two of whatever drug you're on

You've got your bearded idiot in the sky. That dude makes you think enough stupid things without the need for any extras.

what?

Having trouble reading now?

Try reading it slowly.

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: mysterioustranger
a reply to: ssenerawa

Easy. The dinosaur. It already exists. Whereas the egg is just an egg which may or maybe not hatch.

But the dinosaur is already alive.*

*same goes for chicken

But how could it already be alive with nothing to birth it

Easy.

A non dinosaur ancestor.

Try studying evolution before you try and pick holes in it.

So a non dinosaur birth a dinosaur?

No.

A parrot made them.

So why can't a parrot make a dinosaur now

Because they don't want to.

Or because it's impossible

Or maybe it's not and parrots just got fed up with making them?

Maybe it wasn't a parrot. Maybe they were made by squirrels.

Or maybe I want two of whatever drug you're on

You've got your bearded idiot in the sky. That dude makes you think enough stupid things without the need for any extras.

what?

Having trouble reading now?

Try reading it slowly.

What bearded guy now you're assuming I'm religious, which I happen to not be so what your response now