Which came first dinosaur or the egg

originally posted by: Lysergic

That might be a bit to advanced for some around here. They still don't understand how a book works.

originally posted by: Lysergic

So if a species was not in homeostasis and constantly too cold, you honestly believe it would eventually grow fur?

What? No animal species we know has evolved to favor it's environment, animals find their environment not evolve to adapt to it like you were taught. It's survival of the fittest in the wild you either go extinct or don't

a reply to: ssenerawa

If you actually watched it, you would have realized it answers your question about half way through.

Yet you didn't.

But you replied.


So please, do educate us.

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: Lysergic

That might be a bit to advanced for some around here. They still don't understand how a book works.

Why didn't you reply to my other comment..

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: Lysergic

That might be a bit to advanced for some around here. They still don't understand how a book works.

Why didn't you reply to my other comment..

The one about denying ignorance? I already did.

originally posted by: Lysergic
a reply to: ssenerawa

If you actually watched it, you would have realized it answers your question about half way through.

Yet you didn't.

But you replied.


So please, do educate us.

Can't you answer my question with your own brain though?

a reply to: ssenerawa

Can't you use google?

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: Lysergic

That might be a bit to advanced for some around here. They still don't understand how a book works.

Why didn't you reply to my other comment..

The one about denying ignorance? I already did.

So because I'm new to Ats and didn't know how to quote correctly at first you stop answering my questions pretty much

Prove your OP.

originally posted by: Lysergic
a reply to: ssenerawa

Can't you use google?

Can't you use your useless sack of neurons?

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: Lysergic

That might be a bit to advanced for some around here. They still don't understand how a book works.

Why didn't you reply to my other comment..

The one about denying ignorance? I already did.

So because I'm new to Ats and didn't know how to quote correctly at first you stop answering my questions pretty much

I already answers your question. That's he second time I have said that. Learn to read.

a reply to: ssenerawa

Aww whats wrong, feeling a bit creationist?

originally posted by: Lysergic
Prove your OP.

Nothing to prove I'm asking the Ats members on how the perceive creationism and the chicken and egg concept. I never tried to convince anyone of anything

a reply to: ssenerawa

You said the chicken came first.

originally posted by: ssenerawa


Which is why I believe the chicken somehow had to come first.

and then this gem of wisdom;

Take human for example you wouldn't need two to create to have the billions we have. Wouldn't you need at least 4, so that they would actually be able to breed efficiently without the many birth defects that happen when brother-sister, dad-daughter, mom-son or something to that natur

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: Lysergic
Prove your OP.

Nothing to prove I'm asking the Ats members on how the perceive creationism and the chicken and egg concept. I never tried to convince anyone of anything

Actually, that's false. You asked which came first, the dinosaur or the egg. You mever once stated anything about creationism.

This is nothing more than a poor attempt at a bait thread.

originally posted by: Lysergic
a reply to: ssenerawa

Aww whats wrong, feeling a bit creationist?

Not at all, you just keep referring to a video on the theory on evolution without using your brain for once

originally posted by: ssenerawa

originally posted by: Lysergic
a reply to: ssenerawa

Aww whats wrong, feeling a bit creationist?

Not at all, you just keep referring to a book of the theory on evolution without using your brain for once

A theory backed up by evidence.

a reply to: ssenerawa

Watch it, you might learn something.

originally posted by: Lysergic
a reply to: ssenerawa

Watch it, you might learn something.

Thanks for the laugh lol.

originally posted by: Lysergic
a reply to: ssenerawa

You said the chicken came first.

originally posted by: ssenerawa


Which is why I believe the chicken somehow had to come first.

and then this gem of wisdom;

Take human for example you wouldn't need two to create to have the billions we have. Wouldn't you need at least 4, so that they would actually be able to breed efficiently without the many birth defects that happen when brother-sister, dad-daughter, mom-son or something to that natur

That's my opinion. It's not in a persuasive matter is it?