It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Gryphon66
I don't agree with your summation of the political bent of the perpetrators I outlined in my cited list.
That list was really fairly off-topic here, and I don't' want to divert the focus that TechniXcality has clearly stated he wants to pursue.
Perhaps another time.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Gothmog
a reply to: Gryphon66
Ok , here we go....need proof of the following . Not that I dont trust you ....its just I dont trust you
I'd like to see corresponding disgust from from Trump supporters when the same things happen the other way around.
When have the same things happened in reverse ? To coin a phrase from our Glorius Imperious Leader - "just words , just speeches" . Thats what I see in the above. Just words connected together. No proof , nothing said.
Talk is cheap , takes money to buy land.
Did you denounce the violence at Trump rallies by Trump supporters earlier in the spring? Or the sad state of affairs of mutual violence in more recent days?
Trust is not the issue here. Only the facts.
Violence is the problem, not who commits it.
originally posted by: TechniXcality
a reply to: Gryphon66
Hey now, go whichever direction you want, you are more than welcome here in fact I want you to be here, opposing viewpoints or even just a different perspective are paramount to the free exchange of ideas and actually solving the problems we as a society are facing, I am very riled up yes I've been effected by all this civil unrest and I am looking to lay the blame, I think you make a good point authoritarianism is at the core of political violence.
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Gothmog
a reply to: Gryphon66
Ok , here we go....need proof of the following . Not that I dont trust you ....its just I dont trust you
I'd like to see corresponding disgust from from Trump supporters when the same things happen the other way around.
When have the same things happened in reverse ? To coin a phrase from our Glorius Imperious Leader - "just words , just speeches" . Thats what I see in the above. Just words connected together. No proof , nothing said.
Talk is cheap , takes money to buy land.
Did you denounce the violence at Trump rallies by Trump supporters earlier in the spring? Or the sad state of affairs of mutual violence in more recent days?
Trust is not the issue here. Only the facts.
Violence is the problem, not who commits it.
No , I need links from you . I challenged , you provide . Unless you meant things that were about to happen in the future , and you are psychic .
originally posted by: TechniXcality
a reply to: Gryphon66
Yea that's an interesting idea, is this the pressure valve release, or the beginnings of serious escalation, I suppose leadership will have to answer that question, and I'm not sure there's a candidate who has the presence of mind to appeal to everyone involved and frame the conversation in a productive way.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Gothmog
a reply to: Gryphon66
Ok , here we go....need proof of the following . Not that I dont trust you ....its just I dont trust you
I'd like to see corresponding disgust from from Trump supporters when the same things happen the other way around.
When have the same things happened in reverse ? To coin a phrase from our Glorius Imperious Leader - "just words , just speeches" . Thats what I see in the above. Just words connected together. No proof , nothing said.
Talk is cheap , takes money to buy land.
Did you denounce the violence at Trump rallies by Trump supporters earlier in the spring? Or the sad state of affairs of mutual violence in more recent days?
Trust is not the issue here. Only the facts.
Violence is the problem, not who commits it.
No , I need links from you . I challenged , you provide . Unless you meant things that were about to happen in the future , and you are psychic .
You challenged, I declined. Why would I do the work for you? Go to Google, type in "Trump supporters deny violence at rallies."
You won't even answer a question put directly to you about your own actions, I feel no constraint to derail the thread any further.
Start a thread of your own about the presence or absence of the denial of violence from Trump supporters, and I'll be glad to oblige. That's not here though.
I personally am just waiting for the day one of these protestors attacks someone and that someone has a knife, or someone like a concealed carry holder, and a "protestor" ends up dead. I am looking forward to the news stories with other idiots who say, "I know xyz hit him in the head with a baseball bat, but he didn't have to shoot him. He was a good kid and he didn't deserve to die"
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: Gryphon66
It's not just "the religious right" by any means. Most members of the RR in this country are not violent. Even asinine displays like Westboro are the fringe exception rather than the rule ... but you have White Supremacists, Militias, Survivalists and Preppers, etc. that seem to evidence a strong thread of paranoia and translate that into violent acts that actually HAVE resulted in deaths and destruction of property.
How is one type of violence better or more understandable than another sort?
Some examples of this "type of violence" you're comparing with the violence displayed here. Is this the time and place to be mentioning survivalists and preppers.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: Gryphon66
It's not just "the religious right" by any means. Most members of the RR in this country are not violent. Even asinine displays like Westboro are the fringe exception rather than the rule ... but you have White Supremacists, Militias, Survivalists and Preppers, etc. that seem to evidence a strong thread of paranoia and translate that into violent acts that actually HAVE resulted in deaths and destruction of property.
How is one type of violence better or more understandable than another sort?
Some examples of this "type of violence" you're comparing with the violence displayed here. Is this the time and place to be mentioning survivalists and preppers.
So ... I didn't say what you were trying to claim I said? Fair enough; thanks for the self-correction on your part.
The evidence for DEADLY violence on the Right is not hard to find ...
Incident name (Persons killed in parenthesis following)
2015 Colorado Planned Parenthood Shooting (3)
2015 Charleston Church Shooting (9)
2014 Las Vegas Police Ambush (3)
2014 Kansas Jewish Center Shooting (3)
2014 Blooming Grove Police Shooting (1)
2012 Tri-State Killing Spree (4)
2012 St. John's Parish Police Ambush (2)
2012 Sikh Temple Shooting (6)
2011 FEAR Militia (3)
2010 Carlisle, PA Murder (1)
2010 Austin, TX Plane Attack (1)
2009 Pittsburgh Police Shootings (3)
2009 Holocaust Museum Shooting (1)
2009 George Tiller Assassination (1)
2009 Flores Murders, Pima County, AZ (2)
2009 Brockton, MA Murders (2)
2008 Knoxville, TN Church Shooting (2)
Source
47 or so deaths in the past decade or so. Need more or is the point made?
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: TechniXcality
I agree. Let's condemn violence wherever it rears it's ugly head ... rather than continuing comments like "taking hold in the ranks of the left."
Like, for example, Mr. Trump in earlier rallies calling for people in the audience to be kicked? People being removed from arenas who got cold-cocked by Trump supporters? Shootings and assassinations at family planning clinics? Racially motivated shootings at Churches? Etc. etc.
It's not a 'right/left' thing, Tech ... implying that one "side" is guilty and the other innocent is part and parcel of the problem.