It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: Liquesence
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: Liquesence
originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: introvert
He says HuffPo never contacted him nor asked him for sources, they just pulled the post unilaterally.
They have every right to pull anything a user posts that is unverified until they can get verification or evidence for the claim(s).
It's odd, however, that HuffPost didn't contact HIM to ask about his sources and/or evidence...especially if they had an actual desire to validate his claims.
Certainly, they could have offered him a promise of confidentiality.
That's a good, and valid point. They either didn't ask because A) they know it's complete unverifiable BS or B) they're trying to hide something.
Regardless, has the author publicly provided a source or evidence to anyone yet?
Re: A): How could they possibly know it's "completely unverifiable"?
originally posted by: AmericanRealist
a reply to: JuJuBee
Trump is NOT part of the establishment. .......... His descendants will eventually become establishment.
originally posted by: carewemust
I don't care if Trump IS part of the "establishment". He has actually done some of the things he's promising to Make America Even Greater, albeit on a smaller scale, of course. Hillary has done nothing except get voted or appointed into a few government positions in the last 30 years. She's just a run-of-the-mill politician. The kind that people from all walks of life always gripe about. (i.e. "They say one thing to get elected and then do something different, or nothing at all!")
originally posted by: reldra
This thread obviously has no focus. It is on 73 flags and 13 pages and based on a made up blog.
I can see the blog writer is a HARDCORE Sanders fan. He picked a holiday weekend day to put that blog up in HuffPo 'contributors'. A good plan, if you want to put up a fake article with no sources and let it get screen shotted before anyone noticed. I applaud his thought process in order to be fairly successful in his plan.
But really, people HERE fall for it hook, line and sinker. That is sad.
We demand a certain level of sources in most of our threads..but this one got away with NONE?