Chicago man chokes 8-year-old girl in public bathroom

originally posted by: ElectricUniverse

originally posted by: Krakatoa

That is their right to decide to succumb to baseless fear or stand up, put on their big girl panties, and not be crippled by fear. And, last I checked, most women go to the bathroom in herds already. And as for the children, they are usually accompanied by a parent or adult already, unless they are deemed mature enough to have situational awareness. And if they play sports or attend church alone they should have that already.

So in other words, exactly what you are saying is that their rights don't matter... That's exactly what you are saying... Nice country you want to live in huh?...

No, that is your interpretation. A man "showing his male organs" in a ladies room is already illegal. Or don;t you get that yet?

originally posted by: Krakatoa
No, that is your interpretation. A man "showing his male organs" in a ladies room is already illegal. Or don;t you get that yet?

Oh, so it is just my interpretation that there are a lot of women who do not want a person with male organs, and who looks like a man with them in the bathroom huh?...

I didn't write anything about the women seeing the transgender penis, I wrote there are a lot of women who do not want to be in a restroom with a person who has male organs, with a man. So you twisted what i wrote to fit your own agenda. Nice going there...

a reply to: ElectricUniverse

And, how will they know what "organs" are under their clothes? By the way the person looks? I know some men that honestly look like a woman, seriously look like a woman. Unless you looked under their clothes, you would never know. Now, are you telling me that because they look like a man they would make a woman feel uncomfortable in the restroom. Even thought that is the correct room for their "equipment"?

Sounds to me like you know a lot of insecure women that are also very shallow. How is that the fault of other women? The answer is, it is not their fault the way they look. It is the fault of the people the cannot seem to look beyond the cover of the book. Assume and judge others unfairly, and are afraid of their own shadows.

I suggest you befriend some women, some real women, that have more depth and brains.

a reply to: JoshuaCox

Real articles on real websites. Your continued refusal to accept facts is becoming quite interesting.

originally posted by: veracity
a reply to: LadyGreenEyes

If a woman feels "discriminated" bc they have to "share a facility with someone who can't figure out who they actually are" then that is the woman's problem.

By the way...discrimination is not the correct word to use there.

Women are being discriminated against, because their rights and their feelings are not being taken into account. How about the trans people suck it u and use the bathroom that fits their anatomy? Isn't it their problem if they are uncomfortable?? You can't talk about possible assault, either, because there are laws against that.

originally posted by: veracity
Better words to use instead of how you say "Women are being discrimdiscriminatedt by being told they have to share a facility with someone who can't figure out who they actually are" could be

"some women are too immature when they are being told..."
"some women are being naïve when they are being told..."
"some women believe they are too good to use the same bathrooms..."

discriminations does not fit in that sentence...in no way or form are they being "hated against". Did you mean that your women you speak of are hating against transgendered folk?

So, if that's turned around, you have no issues with your wording? What if we said,

"Some trans people are too immature when they are told their actual sex."

or

"Some trans people are being naive when they are told an operation will make everything better."

or

"Some trans people think they are too good to use the same bathroom as others with the same anatomy."

You'd claim that was insensitive, discriminatory, and hateful, and we all know it.

Guess what that makes your comments about women?

originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes

originally posted by: veracity
Better words to use instead of how you say "Women are being discrimdiscriminatedt by being told they have to share a facility with someone who can't figure out who they actually are" could be

"some women are too immature when they are being told..."
"some women are being naïve when they are being told..."
"some women believe they are too good to use the same bathrooms..."

discriminations does not fit in that sentence...in no way or form are they being "hated against". Did you mean that your women you speak of are hating against transgendered folk?

So, if that's turned around, you have no issues with your wording? What if we said,

"Some trans people are too immature when they are told their actual sex."

or

"Some trans people are being naive when they are told an operation will make everything better."

or

"Some trans people think they are too good to use the same bathroom as others with the same anatomy."

You'd claim that was insensitive, discriminatory, and hateful, and we all know it.

Guess what that makes your comments about women?

More like:

"Some people can't mind their own buisness and worry about themselves..."

"Some people are so scared of their shadows they will vilify random groups of people in an attempt to validate their childish fears and bigotries"


"Some people will believe anything that backs up their personal "scaredy catness" even from ridiculous sources, that are the lAughing stock of accredited news organizations."

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
...
"Some people will believe anything that backs up their personal "scaredy catness" even from ridiculous sources, that are the lAughing stock of accredited news organizations."

Riight, so pretty much just your sources are valid and anything you disagree with is invalid. Are we actually discussing with a 5 year old child? Is that what you are? a child with a temper tantrum who only believes his opinions are the only valid ones?... The only laughing stock are you fallacious arguments child.

originally posted by: Krakatoa

And, how will they know what "organs" are under their clothes? By the way the person looks? I know some men that honestly look like a woman, seriously look like a woman. Unless you looked under their clothes, you would never know. Now, are you telling me that because they look like a man they would make a woman feel uncomfortable in the restroom. Even thought that is the correct room for their "equipment"?
...

For crying out loud... Are the mandates only letting transgenders who "look like a woman" in women's restrooms? Or is it allowing all transgenders and even non transgenders who simply put up a farse of "feeling to be a woman inside" to peek at women, record them, and sexually harass them?...

Of course if a transsexual "really" looks like a woman most are not going to know... But we are talking about transgenders that include people that look like MEN in the women's restroom.

originally posted by: Krakatoa
I suggest you befriend some women, some real women, that have more depth and brains.

Naa, your kind of women seem to be sheep that have to "accept what they are being told" instead of having their own opinions. Thank you, but no.

a reply to: ElectricUniverse

Or is it allowing all transgenders and even non transgenders who simply put up a farse of "feeling to be a woman inside" to peek at women, record them, and sexually harass them?...

What has prevented anyone from attempting to doing so previously?
Oh, right, there were and still are laws against doing so.

originally posted by: ElectricUniverse

originally posted by: Krakatoa

And, how will they know what "organs" are under their clothes? By the way the person looks? I know some men that honestly look like a woman, seriously look like a woman. Unless you looked under their clothes, you would never know. Now, are you telling me that because they look like a man they would make a woman feel uncomfortable in the restroom. Even thought that is the correct room for their "equipment"?
...

For crying out loud... Are the mandates only letting transgenders who "look like a woman" in women's restrooms? Or is it allowing all transgenders and even non transgenders who simply put up a farse of "feeling to be a woman inside" to peek at women, record them, and sexually harass them?...

Of course if a transsexual "really" looks like a woman most are not going to know... But we are talking about transgenders that include people that look like MEN in the women's restroom.

originally posted by: Krakatoa
I suggest you befriend some women, some real women, that have more depth and brains.

Naa, your kind of women seem to be sheep that have to "accept what they are being told" instead of having their own opinions. Thank you, but no.

The law only allows for people who "live their life" as the opposite sex. Meaning the whole "what if they pretend to be trans for today" is irrelevant.


Why not just be honest about and say "I think anyone not straight is icky, an abomination and deserves anything bad society can do to them.."

Rather then make up some half @$$ attempt to pretend Like you are sooooo scared of using the bathroom....


At least hold up for your opinions instead of making stuff up..

originally posted by: ElectricUniverse

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
...
"Some people will believe anything that backs up their personal "scaredy catness" even from ridiculous sources, that are the lAughing stock of accredited news organizations."

Riight, so pretty much just your sources are valid and anything you disagree with is invalid. Are we actually discussing with a 5 year old child? Is that what you are? a child with a temper tantrum who only believes his opinions are the only valid ones?... The only laughing stock are you fallacious arguments child.

No.... ccredited news agencies are real sources....

News max, drudge, fox and all the conservative Christian conspiracy sites are the laughing stock of THE WORLDS MEDIA.

Literally every human being on the planet who is not an American conservative knows how ridiculous their propaganda is...

Come on...

"All of the WORLDS media, government, scientific community, teachers, college proffessors, Hollywood , unions, exc are all in a vast conspiracy to make one political party look bad while discrediting JESUS!"

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Do you know what it would actually require to pull off something on that scale????

The only 2 options are:

1: everyone is lying to you except Fox News...

2: Fox News is the main one lying..


By their own propaganda, it is either millions of people all involved in a vast conspiracy...

Or a handful of conservative groups who personally profit from continuing whatever issue..



I will never know how people couldn't spot the ridiculousness of all that instantly...

a reply to: LadyGreenEyes

NO, turning the words around just makes you ignorant of knowing anything about trans people

a reply to: LadyGreenEyes

If a women is stressed out bc she cannot tell if another "female" in the public bathroom has a penis or not... and she feels discriminated bc of that...YES...that is her problem. She needs to chill, let loose, let it all out in the potty, wipe, then have a nice day

originally posted by: veracity
If a women is stressed out bc she cannot tell if another "female" in the public bathroom has a penis or not... and she feels discriminated bc of that...YES...that is her problem. She needs to chill, let loose, let it all out in the potty, wipe, then have a nice day

Women certainly do not "need to losen up". What the hell is it with people telling others how they should feel when their private space is being taken from them?... We are talking about "securing what some want, 0.03% of the population" by forcing the majority of women to accept men in their restrooms and locker rooms...

a reply to: ElectricUniverse

If it is a woman who has trans...then the "uneasy woman" will not even know so she is never "uneasy bc she has to share the bathroom with a penis" in the first place...understand?

There was never any uneasiness to begin with, so in the future...still there will not be any uneasiness.

Unless she is uneasy around ugly people or woman who have scruff...then and only then she would have to "loosen up" .

a reply to: ElectricUniverse

also, if she gets so "uneasy" so easily, maybe she may need not use public restrooms at all in the first place

originally posted by: veracity

also, if she gets so "uneasy" so easily, maybe she may need not use public restrooms at all in the first place

Ah, all you have to say to 1 out of 3 women in the United States who has been a victim in some form of sexual assault by men is to either accept the transgender agenda imposed on them or just don't use public restrooms at all...

a reply to: ElectricUniverse

Those women are gonna freak when they see a transgender male that still has a vagina but has the beard, muscles and body of a man go into the women's room.

originally posted by: veracity
a reply to: LadyGreenEyes

If a women is stressed out bc she cannot tell if another "female" in the public bathroom has a penis or not... and she feels discriminated bc of that...YES...that is her problem. She needs to chill, let loose, let it all out in the potty, wipe, then have a nice day

It's not about whether a woman can tell; it's about obvious MEN - and they are MEN, no matter what they might thin or feel about it - in a place they have no business being, and how that can be very threatening. Go tell all of the sexual assault victims, who don't like these new rules at all, that they don't matter because some guy wants to be a girl, and his feelings matter more than theirs.

That IS what this boils down to.

Oh, and things like an 8-year-old being choked......but hey! Don't offend that trans.