It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I, _____, having been appointed an officer in the Army of the United States, as indicated above in the grade of _____ do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservations or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter; So help me God."
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Bedlam
Sad, if true.
Free speech, but only if we like it.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
This is among the stupidest manufactured outrage to ever cross my eyes.
originally posted by: Bedlam
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Bedlam
Sad, if true.
Free speech, but only if we like it.
If you wanted free speech, you could have done so out of uniform. You are not free to act a clown in your cadet grays.
Consider - if you worked for, say, Apple, and were in Apple clothing, and got on TV and started supporting someone moderately offensive, let's say you went a-Trumping on national TV in your Apple work duds and were shouting 'Apple employees for Trump!', you'd be canned in a blink.
Because you are representing yourself as Apple. Like it or not.
Thus, it is inappropriate to obviously espouse a political viewpoint in uniform. Because politically motivated military are what you get in the third world.
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Bedlam
Actually, that's a good point.
I can agree.
originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: Bedlam
That was not my experience growing up in rural Georgia with the possible exception of the Dukes of Hazzard.
originally posted by: Joecanada11
a reply to: syrinx high priest
Don't you know. The big deal is they are leftist scumbag communist violent extremists snowflakes. That's what the sentiment seems to be.
Two female West Point alumnae are defending the students, saying the raised their fists are meant to convey pride in their achievement of graduating from West Point, which has an overwhelmingly white and male student body. Black female students made up just 1.7% of the graduating class this year.
Brenda Sue Fulton, a West Point alumni from 1980 and now chairwoman of the US Military Academy’s Board of Visitors, told VICE News, “They’re celebrating the completion of a very difficult course of study. The pride and sense of triumph that cadets feel as they set out on their army careers. There was nothing political about this photo.” “These ladies weren’t raising their fist to say Black Panthers. They were raising it to say Beyoncé,” Mary Tobin, a 2003 graduate of West Point, told The New York Times. “For them it’s not a sign of allegiance to a movement, it’s a sign that means unity and pride and sisterhood,” she added.
The raised fist has had many meanings throughout history, including solidarity among workers’ rights groups. More recently, it was used by Beyoncé in the choreography to her song “Formation” in the Super Bowl half-time show this year.
And it is, of course, frequently thrown into the air in the service of good, old-fashioned pride and celebration.
originally posted by: Martin75
Black Panthers HATE group
At least let it be the same for Everyone!!!!!! How about we all stop with the hate!
originally posted by: draoicht
The power of the image is context.
Sixteen people who I would trust with my life. As others will have to.
Sixteen people I would not want to fight. As others will have to.
Sixteen people who look quite capable of defending the Constitution. Some of whom may die doing so.
Sixteen people who don't deserve meaningless armchair pontification.