It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It's quite simple. A trade deficit means that one is buying more goods than one is selling.
Why don't you explain the trade deficit to me with your unending k owledge
So, let's take the ball and go home. From everyone with different rules.
they don't follow the same rules as us.
To lose 350 billion is better than losing nothing
originally posted by: CranialSponge
a reply to: Phage
Kashmir would be my coronation song... followed by Comfortably Numb as an aperitif.
GMOs are so good, the corporation foisting them on us has to lobby the government for legal immunity from injuries as a result of our ingesting them.
originally posted by: Astyanax
a reply to: onequestion
Please stop acting as if you know what you are talking about. To repeat Phage's question, which trade terms are you talking about? What are your specific objections?
Since when is everyone supposed to benefit from anything having to do with trade?
Since you want to play why don't you tell us how our relationship with China has been benefitting us at all?
Yeah. I know you don't like the idea of profit.
Why don't you just say that's it's widening the profit margins benefitting the shareholders
Because, like I said previously. You don't have the slightest understanding. For you, it's all about "what's in it for me." For you, it always if someone is doing better than me, it means I'm losing.
So why don't you want to talk about the products being sold to China
So, boycott Chinese products. Maybe you'll feel better about it.
I mean a 350 billion $ deficit is nothing bah who cares.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: onequestion
Nothing. We are selling nothing to China.
Do you really want me to believe that by ending trade with China returning that 350 billion dollars back to US markets wouldn't offset the 250 billion dollar loss were experiencing