It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
a reply to: Profusion
Doesn't anyone see the danger? What's the standard for determining a real transgender person versus a pervert who just wants access to bathrooms that are for the opposite sex? That's why transgender people shouldn't be allowed in the wrong bathrooms.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Tiamat384
a reply to: Annee
No meaning we learn not to play god or do something like..this. It has much to do about morals.
LGBT are born who they are.
God made them that way.
Playing God would be to oppose and interfere with what God made.
Morality? Who's morality? Who chooses what is moral and what isn't?
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
. . . expect the discrete minority of outliers to the norm to be the ones who need to adapt, . . ..
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: BIGPoJo
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Tiamat384
a reply to: Annee
I did. And no not their "acceptance". This world has become too liberal, too free. No morality. Nothing. Love the arguments/deflections used by people. Lack of morals shall be the downfall of civilization; least the one we know of. And no that doesn't mean this....issue...exclusively.
Too liberal?
Meaning we need to control people and make sure they stay in the "acceptable box"?
Morals has nothing to do with this subject.
You mean like liberal Obama or liberal Hillary who control what gun I can own?
You seem to have lost your way.
Please try to find the thread that addresses the subject you are interested in.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: WeRpeons
Most women wouldn't be able to physically fight off an attack by a male dressed as a women. It also puts children at risk from pedophiles.
How does this law prevent rapists and child molesters from gaining access to bathrooms?
originally posted by: BIGPoJo
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Tiamat384
a reply to: Annee
No meaning we learn not to play god or do something like..this. It has much to do about morals.
LGBT are born who they are.
God made them that way.
Playing God would be to oppose and interfere with what God made.
Morality? Who's morality? Who chooses what is moral and what isn't?
. . . disgust for the trans lifestyle.
originally posted by: BIGPoJo
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: BIGPoJo
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Tiamat384
a reply to: Annee
I did. And no not their "acceptance". This world has become too liberal, too free. No morality. Nothing. Love the arguments/deflections used by people. Lack of morals shall be the downfall of civilization; least the one we know of. And no that doesn't mean this....issue...exclusively.
Too liberal?
Meaning we need to control people and make sure they stay in the "acceptable box"?
Morals has nothing to do with this subject.
You mean like liberal Obama or liberal Hillary who control what gun I can own?
You seem to have lost your way.
Please try to find the thread that addresses the subject you are interested in.
No, I am in the correct thread. It's titled "Trump: Transgender people can use whatever bathroom they want" but the meat of the subject is "Left ghhhooooddd, Right bhahhhhhd. Bahhhhhh (sheep noises)".
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: Annee
Trump says whatever he thinks will get him votes.
So does pretty much every other politician from the beginning of time.
originally posted by: Annee
NO. No they don't.
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: MystikMushroom
Normalcy isn't "narrow mindedness," it's mathematical averages. If anything, it's the most logical course of action to simply expect the discrete minority of outliers to the norm to be the ones who need to adapt, not expect the majority to change simply to accommodate the few.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: Annee
Trump says whatever he thinks will get him votes.
So does pretty much every other politician from the beginning of time.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: Annee
NO. No they don't.
I can give example after example that the other turd buckets running for office this year all do the same thing.
Start a thread about how altruistic your candidate happens to be and I can oblige you with how they are full of it.
originally posted by: Annee
I think Hillary is the most qualified of the bunch. That's as far as I go.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: Annee
NO. No they don't.
I can give example after example that the other turd buckets running for office this year all do the same thing.
Start a thread about how altruistic your candidate happens to be and I can oblige you with how they are full of it.
I don't have a candidate.
I think Hillary is the most qualified of the bunch. That's as far as I go.