Saudi Arabia Warns of Economic Fallout if Congress Passes 9/11 Bill

originally posted by: angeldoll

originally posted by: StallionDuck
Question:

How would Saudi benefit from 9/11?

Terrorist cells would have their own twisted purpose but why would a country get involved? What was their MO? Surely they would have to have some kind of motivating factor.

Hatred.

scratch.


iTruthSeeker

a reply to: Profusion

key people from Saudi Aurabia were flown out of the US to keep them from being questioned that the US knew that Saudi Aurabia was involved in 9/11. Did anyone else feel that way?

That was designed to show they didn't have prior knowledge. If they hadn't just happened to have been here (on Sept. 11 no less), the suspicion would be greater in the public minds eye.

As is the appearance it gave was a rescue mission to protect the royals from Americans, lol?

Thats as funny as GWB Jr. just happening to be in that classroom that morning, surrounded by children.

a reply to: Profusion

I am not surprised.
The House of Saud is divided along the lines of the devout Wahhabi and those willing to get in bed with the infidels for more money.

The devout Wahhabi side contribute monetarily to Islamic Fighters all over the world

originally posted by: StallionDuck
Question:

How would Saudi benefit from 9/11?

Terrorist cells would have their own twisted purpose but why would a country get involved? What was their MO? Surely they would have to have some kind of motivating factor.

Very easily, when the airline's stocks plummeted after 9 11, those in the know were ready to buy and buy and buy, a month later, stocks back to normal, so sell a few stocks per week, it has been estimated that the Bin ladens made $20 million, Allah only knows what the saudi's made.

originally posted by: supremecommander
If they want to threaten us economically then maybe we need to turn their palaces to ash and seize their oil

So you are a corporation man.

On behalf of which corporation should our government use military action to destroy a country and seize their resources for?

Clinton Foundation Defends Acceptance of Foreign Donations

Saudi Arabia, a previous donor, has given between $10 million and $25 million since the foundation’s creation. An unspecified portion of the money came in 2014.

Am id presidential campaign launch, Clinton Foundation reports rising donations

For instance, the organization is not currently accepting new donations from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, which has donated between $10 million and $25 million to the foundation in the past. However, a charitable foundation started by Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal donated this year.

Saudi Arabia's Exploding Christmas Gifts From Hillary Clinton

Many are criticizing her hawkish foreign policy, which is the best indication of what President Hillary's foreign policy would be, with many focusing on her long relationship with Saudi Arabia.

During her tenure as Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton made weapons transfers to the Saudi government a "top priority," according to a new report published in The Intercept. While Clinton's State Department was deeply invested in getting weapons to Saudi Arabia, the Clinton Foundation accepted millions of dollars in donations from both the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the weapons manufacturer Boeing. Christmas presents were being gifted all around.

a reply to: Profusion

The United States has always defended human rights, but to have a friend that has the worst human rights record in the world, something doesn't mesh. Saudi Arabia has engaged in as many brutal and primitive acts against their own people as ISIL! They enforce Sharia Law in their country for Pete's sake!

Sounds like the Saudi's are getting nervous about the 28 classified pages being released to the American public. If those pages do connect Saudi Arabia to financing 9/11, not only should they be held accountable but so should the Bush administration and Obama for not releasing these documents immediately to the American public!

How could anyone trust a government who would intentionally hold damning evidence about a country's involvement in one of the worst attacks on American soil! What side is our government on? It sure isn't the people they're supposed to protect and serve!

I would rather have an enemy that has financed an attack on our country and killed over 3,000 innocent people, than an enemy in which our government creates in the minds of it's people. It's time we start utilizing technology that will wean us off oil so the world can stop financing these oil rich regimes.

originally posted by: Rosinitiate
America, the nation that protects, finances and arms her enemies and imprisons her citizens for the smallest of infractions. Love it!

Yep, just like the state Department armed Saddam through the French, Israelis and South Africa so he could invade Kuwait, which was the plan, so the US could have the Gulf War. The CIA was telling Saddam everything was going to be OK, right up to 3 days before the air war started. One thing I've always wondered.. Since the US sold the weapons to Saddam, the weapons that were used to kill and mame our soldiers, is that "friendly fire?" As well, does that mean that the state department and Congress may as well have done the actual shooting? Because if it wasn't for "Eddie and the jets" there would not have been a Gulf War.

Big wave to Eddie ^^^, the truth may hurt but it can never be a lie ;-)

Cheers - Dave

a reply to: Profusion

Good, let them threaten economic fallout, and when they attempt this, we declare war on them and take everything they got... I'm pretty sure we (plus NATO) could take down the Saudi Kingdom and redistribute all their assets back around us allies...

a reply to: StallionDuck

Nothing.

No one in the ME nor in the Arab nor Moslem world benefited from 9/11.

The West on the other hand...

Well SA, didn't like Iraq, Libya, Syria and neither Iran..

Only Iran is left to be attacked and thrown in Chaos and SA would be very happy I guess.

originally posted by: WeRpeons
a reply to: Profusion

The United States has always defended human rights, but to have a friend that has the worst human rights record in the world, something doesn't mesh.

I think our support of Human Rights is conditional depending upon how much money is involved
The Human Rights violations in China are largely ignored since they are our favored trading partner.

250 Million Chinese had their lands bull dozed and forced to move to the cities and nary a peep from the state department about it when Huge Corporations had a lot of money to make

a reply to: Grimpachi

If we didn't need their oil or oil companies we could tell them to F## off.

And yet you don't comment on the fact that 911 was used as an excuse to tread/invade on other countries sovereignty and steal resources in the "national interest".

Remember its not only the oil you need but the world trading in US petrodollars that keeps your economy afloat but still only one hiccup away from insolvency.

a reply to: jhn7537

redistribute all their assets

"redistribute" Orwellian; definition: Theft, steal, non-payment etc etc

I think our support of Human Rights is conditional depending upon how much money is involved

a reply to: jacobe001

Exactly. The U.S. ignores human rights issues when they're benefiting from the country financially. What's the saying? "Money is the root of all evil."

However, to continue to support a country if they had a financial connection to the 9/11 attack on American soil is nothing less than criminal.

a reply to: TechniXcality

He's a disinfo agent.

Could oil really be the only reason we now have yet another President in recent history, Bush Sr. , Clinton, Bush Jr. , Obama, and God forbid possibly another Clinton ,who are so "cozy" with a Country that contradicts on the most basic levels American values ? Isn't that why we're told we go and invade Countries like Iraq and Libya, to "Liberate" them from the sorts of "crimes against humanity" that Saudi Arabia seems to be unapologetic about embracing ? Gaddafi was a saint compared to " The Saudi Kingdom " when it came to human rights.

This seems to me to be just another piece of the puzzle concerning what actually happened on 9-11, and reinforces other evidence that Saudi Arabia was somehow involved in 9-11 , What is in those "classified" 28 pages from the 9-11 commission ?

If there is in fact evidence that proves Saudi Arabia was involved in 9-11 ...I think all property and assets on American soil owned by the Saudi "Kingdom" should be seized . I also don't think any other Country should be able to own enough American Property to pose any kind of threat to the American economy, but that's another issue.

If the TRUTH also takes down people in the American Government, so be it...rip off that band-aide , clean this festering wound and begin to heal not only America, but the World. The people involved is this unholy alliance, do not and did not have the "right" to make these treasonous deals with Saudi Arabia that gives them this much power. We will survive, re-build and convert our energy system here in America.

the justice dept should make a deal with the saudis, let them off the hook for it as long as they provide the evidence as to just who is the traitors in our mist! I want the puppet masters, not the puppets!

a reply to: Grimpachi

We don't need them. Haven't for years. Our leaders want us to believe we need them to serve their own common agendas.

a reply to: Profusion

Well, this is epic.

Economic collapse?

F**k em! We'll take our chances, recover and come out on top. And if by chance, this ruins us, so be it. Id rather cut the cord from the Saudis and do our best to survive than continue this charade as if no one notices the elephant in the room!

This must get resolved, must come to light. Its overdue!

LETS DO THIS