It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Discotech
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Not a lie because they've convinced themselves it's the truth, so it's more delusion than lie
It's actually not dissimilar to Stockholm Syndrome where a captive starts having empathy towards their captor
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: ChesterJohn
originally posted by: Krazysh0t, but many Christians refuse to do so holding to the idea that the Bible is true, even at the expense of quality evidence stating that isn't the case.
What particular example can you give (quoting the Bible) of an issue that is not true, also please quote the quality evidence that shows the truth to that which the Bible says.
That way we can see what is you are specifically saying isn't true in the Bible but true in the real world.
There was no global flood. Humans can't walk on water. You can't fit two of every animal in the world in a boat. You can't repopulate a species of animal (human or otherwise) with just two of that species. You can't turn water into wine. Bushes on fire don't speak.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: ChesterJohn
originally posted by: Krazysh0t, but many Christians refuse to do so holding to the idea that the Bible is true, even at the expense of quality evidence stating that isn't the case.
What particular example can you give (quoting the Bible) of an issue that is not true, also please quote the quality evidence that shows the truth to that which the Bible says.
That way we can see what is you are specifically saying isn't true in the Bible but true in the real world.
There was no global flood. Humans can't walk on water. You can't fit two of every animal in the world in a boat. You can't repopulate a species of animal (human or otherwise) with just two of that species. You can't turn water into wine. Bushes on fire don't speak.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: Klassified
Yea, I can see where you are coming from here as I too used to be Catholic and had trouble looking at things through a non-Christian lens. I too used to have this problem, but my trust in science also caused me to believe in things like evolution and plate tectonics. So I would sit and try to rationalize how these things would work within the bible or not think about the inconsistencies too much. My favorite rationalization used to be saying that the 7 days of Genesis don't necessarily have to be Earth days, but then I sat down and figured out the time frames involved for each day and realized that even this cop out doesn't hold up. The length of each day is wildly variable (the first one is longer than the next 6 combined) and certain things happen twice.
originally posted by: ChesterJohn
Every Continent shows evidence of a great flood.
You only need two pure canine genes to get all the known breads of canine over the centuries unto today . You could not do it today because the gene pools are so corrupted. But the genetic make-up was purer then than it is now. So the same goes for all animals species cats, birds monkey's etc . . .
You only have to have the animals on board for a year and a half. So newly weaned animals are smaller and easier to care for and when they leave the ark they will be ready to breed and start repopulating the earth.
You or I can't turn water into wine but God can.
The bush burned but was not consumed by the fire re-read Exodus again.. The bush did not speak it was an angel of the Lord that spoke. Paul told us that Moses received the Law from the mouth of an angel.
Just because you don't believe something is possible doesn't mean it is not true.
There was no global flood. Humans can't walk on water. You can't fit two of every animal in the world in a boat. You can't repopulate a species of animal (human or otherwise) with just two of that species. You can't turn water into wine. Bushes on fire don't speak.
And hey, just for #s and giggles, let's extend an olive branch to the Muslims and Jews out there. Why is it important for your holy books to be true?
Have any of you considered what life would be like if those books WEREN'T true?
Is there something wrong with starting from the idea of no knowns and then collecting evidence to see how things work?
Doesn't that seem logical and reasonable?
Have you considered that the only reason you believe these books to be true is because your parents and elders told you they were?
Well what if they were wrong? How do you know they knew what they were talking about?
1. Say: O disbelievers!
2. I worship not that which ye worship;
3. Nor worship ye that which I worship.
4. And I shall not worship that which ye worship.
5. Nor will ye worship that which I worship.
6. Unto you your religion, and unto me my religion.