It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: darkbake
originally posted by: Metallicus
I said, based on the high number of Muslims that are radicalized I will be assuming they are dangerous because I don't have the skills or time to decide which is which. I said I personally will avoid Muslims.
Nope. I dont know where you get your 1% from. It's closer to 50-80% - depending on the source country.
As for the guy who mentioned that "50% of serial killers are white" lol! In predominantly white usa - of course they are. Actually, thats quite low, and seems to indicate that per capita - far too many serial killers in the US are non-white. However this is all comparing apples and oranges as in countries in the West that have a significant muslem population (Sweden for instance), the crime rate amongst muslims is right through the roof per cpita. It's so high it's frightening. Rape, murder, assault, theft, drug trafficking - you name it - muslims lead the pack by a country mile or more.
Have you looked into how many Muslims have been radicalized? Sources I was just reading said less than 1%, not 20%.
originally posted by: aorAki
a reply to: cavtrooper7
Yep, as I said, and you have more than aptly illustrated: you are part of the problem, while thinking you're part of the solution.
originally posted by: JesusChristwins
Muslims are dangerous because by fact their Koran teaches them to act with hate against people of other beliefs.
Muslims are dangerous because by fact their Koran teaches them to act with hate against people of other beliefs.
What percentage do you assume are radical Muslims?
All I suggested is that I will avoid this demographic because of their propensity for violence.
originally posted by: jimbo999
... it would be honorable to show some respect to those willing to do the dirty work on your behalf.
originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
Should we make them wear a badge, thereby making it easier for citizens to identify the people they must assume are dangerous?
originally posted by: JourneymanWelder
originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
Should we make them wear a badge, thereby making it easier for citizens to identify the people they must assume are dangerous?
i have heard some dumb ideas in my day but wow dude. you really think if someone is a terrorist and we tell them to wear a badge that they will wear it? they may say yes but guaranteed when they get home they will be wiping their ass with your badge. use your noggin.
originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
originally posted by: JourneymanWelder
originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
Should we make them wear a badge, thereby making it easier for citizens to identify the people they must assume are dangerous?
i have heard some dumb ideas in my day but wow dude. you really think if someone is a terrorist and we tell them to wear a badge that they will wear it? they may say yes but guaranteed when they get home they will be wiping their ass with your badge. use your noggin.
You miss the point entirely and yet have the nerve to call me dumbass.
Way to go, dude.