It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: JourneymanWelder
originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
originally posted by: JourneymanWelder
originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
Should we make them wear a badge, thereby making it easier for citizens to identify the people they must assume are dangerous?
i have heard some dumb ideas in my day but wow dude. you really think if someone is a terrorist and we tell them to wear a badge that they will wear it? they may say yes but guaranteed when they get home they will be wiping their ass with your badge. use your noggin.
You miss the point entirely and yet have the nerve to call me dumbass.
Way to go, dude.
i see the point, youre a moron. thats all i need to see.
we should give you a moron badge so you can wear it with pride.
Before you really get carried away, you might want to pick up a history book, because you really, really missed the point. I believe the operative quote is "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."
originally posted by: JourneymanWelder
originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
originally posted by: JourneymanWelder
originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
Should we make them wear a badge, thereby making it easier for citizens to identify the people they must assume are dangerous?
i have heard some dumb ideas in my day but wow dude. you really think if someone is a terrorist and we tell them to wear a badge that they will wear it? they may say yes but guaranteed when they get home they will be wiping their ass with your badge. use your noggin.
You miss the point entirely and yet have the nerve to call me dumbass.
Way to go, dude.
i see the point, youre a moron. thats all i need to see.
we should give you a moron badge so you can wear it with pride.
originally posted by: neformore
a reply to: Metallicus
Well for a start, if you are basing your one in five figure from the crap that got circulated by Rupert Murdoch's rag, that has been ruled to be misleading by the UK Press Regulator
The Sun's UK Muslim 'jihadi sympathy' article 'misleading', Ipso rules
Now lets address the rest of it.
As can be seen from these actual statistics 51.7% of serial killers are white people.
31% of public mass shootings WORLDWIDE happen in the USA
This article from Huffington Post belies your predjudices
As a matter of fact, Americans were more likely to be killed by a toddler in 2013 than they were by a so-called “Muslim terrorist”.
Are you living in fear of all those things as well? Do you want to get rid of white people, gun owners and toddlers?
If you wish to stupidly live in fear and make false assumptions, listen to right wing propaganda from extremely dubious news sources and ride the kool aid train then that is to your detriment.
May you should try to actively educate yourself with facts on the subject from sites that aren't run by Rupert Murdoch, can be tracked back to Breitbart, or are associated with far right elements, or so-called "patriotism"? - here's a clue, if, on the first page, it mentions saving the middle east's only nuclear armed country, or rips into the Koran in any article, or has bible quotes plastered all over it to the detriment of every other religion, then its not likely going to give you a balanced viewpoint.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Metallicus
The problem is I can't tell the difference and there really are 10-20% of Muslims who will kill you or worse because of their ideology.
Yah, okay. I think all metal heads look the same, too. Theres no telling how dangerous they are so mistrust all of them.
(sarc off)
originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
Should we make them wear a badge, thereby making it easier for citizens to identify the people they must assume are dangerous?
But I purposely made a point to talk to them..... and we had a pleasant conversation.