It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: M5xaz
Right.
So now that the cost argument has been settled, move to another excuse.
Border walls work very very well, in Egypt or Israel for example.
But for liberals, it is never about facts
Assuming the cost of the fence was equivalent to the U.S. fence ($3 million a mile), that suggests about $1 billion of the cost was for the fence; the other $1.4 billion was for 33 miles of the wall (which was built in mostly metropolitan areas). Believe it or not, that translates to $42 billion for 1,000 miles of a 25-foot wall. (Recall that Trump wants a 35-to-40-foot wall.)
The Corps of Engineers estimated that the 25-year life cycle cost of the fence would range from $16.4 million to $70 million per mile; the total cost of the fencing so far has been $7 billion, according to the Congressional Research Service.)
originally posted by: M5xaz
But for liberals, it is never about facts
originally posted by: M5xaz
originally posted by: amicktd
originally posted by: M5xaz
originally posted by: amicktd
originally posted by: M5xaz
originally posted by: tothetenthpower
a reply to: M5xaz
Because financially, $10.5B is cheaper than paying benefits to an endless flow of illegals
But it would cost..probably 10 times that.
People forget he also wants to hire thousands of government employees to man the border, then you have the equipment required and the maintenance involved with keeping something that big, properly working.
Everybody whose done any kind of real math on this projects, knows the 10 billion dollar argument isn't real. It's just a talking point.
~Tenth
I see
Drop defending the border ?
Defending the border is more expensive than providing tens to hundreds of billions in benefits to illegals ?
W.r.t. the cost of the fence, view the link I gave you.
I know, `Math is hard`.....
The point was that the Wall won't work, so the illegals will still come and we will still be paying for them and the wall.
Right.
So now that the cost argument has been settled, move to another excuse.
Border walls work very very well, in Egypt or Israel for example.
But for liberals, it is never about facts
I'm not a liberal, but I'll play. So you use the it worked in another country argument, but when others point out Socialism working in other countries it's not a valid argument? I guess if it fits your agenda then it works, if not then it won't work. I think facts is the last thing you are looking for.
No
Weak attempt at strawman - socialism has never worked anywhere
Again, stick to facts
originally posted by: tothetenthpower
originally posted by: whyamIhere
C'mon man he can't mean a physical wall.
Trump has said we don't need a wall the entire way.
When has he said that?
And if he did, I bet you there are 10 other videos of him saying he would build it the whole way.
That's kinda the problem right?
See it's funny, cause Conservatives make fun of Bernie Sanders for having Pie in the Sky policies like free education.
Well GOP, meet your 'pie in the sky issue'. A 2000 mile long border wall that Mexico will pay for.
It's so absurd to even contemplate, I don't even understand how some people can look at this financially and think it's a good idea.
~Tenth
Other than his bank account, Trump completely exemplifies the working class. From his bad hair to his taste in women, to his taste for gold-and-and crimson decor, to his New Yoik accent (which sounds more like a Joisey accent?!?!O|). Trump is like Fred Flintstone won the lottery, a colorized Ralph Cramden.