Revealed: Monsanto GM corn caused tumors in rats

a reply to: theboarman

I agree. We didn't need gmo's for thousands of years and there is a definite conspiracy to poison us by any and all means available including the medicine that we are given.

originally posted by: theboarman
a reply to: DJW001

There are dictators in Africa using the anti-GMO rhetoric to starve their people.

got any links or proof for that claim? im interested.

You can start here for the most objective account:

www.unep.org...

Here's a slightly more biased source:

www.thenational.ae...

originally posted by: Jonbet
a reply to: theboarman

I agree. We didn't need gmo's for thousands of years and there is a definite conspiracy to poison us by any and all means available including the medicine that we are given.

Maybe the conspiracy is to control the population by getting them to reject GMOs so that everyone starves but the Illuminati, who thrive on them.

a reply to: Jonbet

thats interesting, i never heard of that theory before, ill have to do some more research into it sometime.

a reply to: DJW001

I highly doubt that, in fact reject entirely the premise that they don't want us to eat gmo crops. They are practically forcing it on unwilling farmers who complain about it all the time.

You must be a propagandist if you are pushing that theory

a reply to: theboarman

Start with forced vaccinations and flouride, some vaccines are perfectly effective but who knows what is in them.

I have never a flu shot or the flu in my entire life.

originally posted by: Jonbet
a reply to: DJW001

I highly doubt that, in fact reject entirely the premise that they don't want us to eat gmo crops. They are practically forcing it on unwilling farmers who complain about it all the time.

You must be a propagandist if you are pushing that theory

You fell for it! GMOs are the only thing that can protect you from deadly chemtrails. By circulating rumors that GMOs are bad for you, our reptilian overlords are using reverse psychology to rid themselves of trouble makers. Would you rather be a live sheep or a dead wise guy?

a reply to: DJW001

can you derailing my thread, thanks.

as to what you posted above about the countrys not wanting to take gmo, they have valid points for not taking them. cross contamination etc

originally posted by: theboarman
a reply to: DJW001

can you

derailing my thread, thanks.

as to what you posted above about the countrys not wanting to take gmo, they have valid points for not taking them.

Sorry, but if people want to talk about GMO conspiracies... Anyway, is it reasonable to let people starve based on a flawed study? What points did you consider to be valid?

a reply to: SaturnFX

I'm not a wealthy person, but I make sure that I buy organic food where it's available!

a reply to: DJW001

"I recall that there was GM maize meal on the local market a few months ago, which was marked 'not suitable for children under the age of 13'. What does that tell you about GM foods? We have been eating them because we had no choice, not now," said Noah Mataruse, 35, of the Mbare suburb in Harare.

"We took a position in 2002 that we will not accept unmilled maize. If we are to get any maize, it has to be milled first before it is distributed. Yes we have a section of our population in need of assistance, but that does not mean that we accept maize that can pose long-term impact on their heath and our farm produce, which has always been organic."

see, in your own post people dont want to be eating the stuff, and if it is so safe why not for children under the age of 13?

Malawi and Mozambique refused to accept GM food aid unless it was milled, this being seen as a precaution to avoid any germination of whole grains and to limit impacts on biodiversity;

Some approaches to GM food aid are identified in Box 4. Mozambique raised concerns about accepting GM maize aid on biosafety and human health grounds and opted to ban its import.

its not just one study, there are others showing the danger of gmo, your links hurt you more then help you. now go to sleep nice disinfo agent.

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: theboarman
a reply to: DJW001

can you

derailing my thread, thanks.

as to what you posted above about the countrys not wanting to take gmo, they have valid points for not taking them.

Sorry, but if people want to talk about GMO conspiracies... Anyway, is it reasonable to let people starve based on a flawed study? What points did you consider to be valid?

What conspiracy?? The fact that there are credible scientific studies showing that GMO is bad for us and that Monsanto say that it's not???

Sorry but Monsanto are a company that are proven liars, and that's a fact. Monsanto don't care how many people become ill or even die from eating their poison, they care about profits, end of story. If you don't believe that just go and see the residents of Anniston for starters.

This is a company whose history is littered with scandals. If you want to eat their poison then go ahead but thankfully most people know better.

a reply to: theboarman

A piece of good news regarding corn: hardly any of the corn you buy at the grocery store (even the "conventional" aka organophosphate-laced) type is GMO corn. The GMO corn is almost entirely used for biofuels and (unfortunately) cattle/chicken feed.

a reply to: theboarman

"They" are killing us softly with there food.

a reply to: DJW001

You are a terrible dis info agent. I wouldn't believe your crap un a million years, I know all I need to know about Monsanto and GMO's which is STAY THE F AWAY from them. You want to poison yourself that is your business.

Gmo's the only thing that protect us from chemtrails? That is the single dumbest thing I have ever heard. Chemtrails are not even an issue for me, but nothing about you say is going to be believed by anyone. You are no Goebbels, your a terrible propagandist.

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: intrptr

The 'real' study is us… since they removed GMO labeling, its a blind study, too.

There is no GMO labeling in the US, although some products will claim that they contain no GMOs. You can always purchase those.

You really believe that? Lots of companies ads or labeling claim this and that, its 'organic', 'healthier', etc.

And you're right there is no gmo labeling here, US is the inventor of GMO, they'd never allow that. Thats what I meant by a 'blind' study, we are blind to the toxins they feed us and the results will be secret too. The number of people dying from various cancers.

a reply to: intrptr

Yah, but natural food DNA doesn't have pesticide in it

Neither does GMO DNA. However, like some GM plants, many natural food plants produce pesticides. In fact, most do. Otherwise they would not survive.
www.fortfreedom.org...
www.hort.purdue.edu...
www.botgard.ucla.edu...
www.amnh.org...

aren't programmed to not germinate,

If GM plants are programmed to not germinate, how can there be any GM crops?

and have adapted over eons, not twenty years time.

Actually, natural plants have adapted to herbicides over the past decades. But of what importance is the time span?

a reply to: Phage

More like natural resistance to bugs, the foliage doesn't taste good so bugs don't eat it. The bugs don't die because they don't eat it.

We on the other hand are ignorant to the actual petrochemical 'derivatives' on and in our food as a result of fertilizing, spraying and GMO to keep bugs off edibles that are not healthy because they been fed a life time of chemical fertilizers and (whatever)-cides. The whole reason they put the pesticide gene in the DNA because they wanted to prevent the bugs eating the plant and fruit over the whole growth cycle.

Except like you explained, the bugs develop immunity , so the bugs adapt and win anyway, becoming super bugs that foreshadow a coming plague, the likes of which-- blah blah.

GMOs are most definitely programmed not to germinate so farmers have to buy seed from Monsanto every year… convenient that. Genetic modification to monopolize food for business interests, not to make it 'more healthy'.

In India the poor dirt farmers are killing themselves in droves drinking the pesticide provided for their crops because of it.

a reply to: intrptr

More like natural resistance to bugs, the foliage doesn't taste good so bugs don't eat it. The bugs don't die because they don't eat it.

No. More like actual pesticides. Read the links. You said natural plants don't have pesticides. You are mistaken.

The whole reason they put the pesticide gene in the DNA because they wanted to prevent the bugs eating the plant and fruit over the whole growth cycle.

Well, yes. And to cut down on the amount of spraying required.

Except like you explained, the bugs develop immunity , so the bugs adapt and win anyway, becoming super bugs that foreshadow a coming plague, the likes of which-- blah blah.

Not so much super bugs. Just bugs resistant to a pesticide. So, they won't take over any more than they did before the pesticide was used.

GMOs are most definitely programmed not to germinate so farmers have to buy seed from Monsanto every year… convenient that. Genetic modification to monopolize food for business interests, not to make it 'more healthy'.

No, they aren't. Otherwise farmers would not be sued for replanting and selling, in violation of the terms of sale. Right? Except for a certain rice, I don't know of any claims that GM crops are "more healthy."

In India the poor dirt farmers are killing themselves in droves drinking the pesticide provided for their crops because of it.

Why would they do that?

a reply to: Phage

No. More like actual pesticides. Read the links. You said natural plants don't have pesticides. You are mistaken.

We don't eat the parts of the plant that have bug resistant organic "pesticides". Comparing natures resistance to man made chemicals is comparing apples and oranges. Monsanto is a chemical company, they gave us DDT and Agent Orange.

No, they aren't. Otherwise farmers would not be sued for replanting and selling, in violation of the terms of sale. Right? Except for a certain rice, I don't know of any claims that GM crops are "more healthy."

If you haven't seen it (and I would be surprised Phage, you are well informed), watch Food Inc. Heres a short clip from the film…