Noticed it yet? Israel has not being targeted by ISIS or Other Terrorists

a reply to: theultimatebelgianjoke

I had to google the quote, and I don't get that from the video.

So you're saying that you're not actually racist, and are criticizing the perception you have of Israel not as a people, but as a national government, much like Jesus would criticise the legal authority of his day in the same area, except without being in Israel the country.

edit to clarify: I mean the bull# legal authority, not the theocratic legal authority. As in the people who think their opinion and law is the same thing if they just sign in in a town hall.

Interesting, that's what I meant earlier by " a fan in denial" because you'd be a friend of the semites by being interested in how they are governed which is the antithesis of an anti-semite.

However, rolling around saying you're an anti-semite and publishing cartoons suggesting Israelis look like the goblins drawn in 1930s nazi newspapers and are trying to con the world while they launch nuclear bombs into Iran (of all places), gives another impression, especially in a thread about Israel in regards to Isis which is not at all Iranian or in conflict with Israel, which Iran also isn't.

a reply to: TaleDawn

Ever notice saint Peter is Jewish, hence Jews are the darlings of the Vatican.

a reply to: theultimatebelgianjoke

I was talking about Israel.
Do you want Israeli examples ?

The only people who threaten violence in Israeli pizzerias are Palestinians, most of whom rented the land they were evicted from.

a reply to: wisvol

So you like my cartoons ?



At least that's not denial ...
But you'll probably call it ...
No surprise it once won the Holocaust cartoon contest of Teheran.



At least, me, I'm for the two state solution.

‘No such country as Israel’ Belgian terror helpline operator tells Jewish caller

a reply to: DJW001

Home demolitions displace 330 Palestinians in single month

Business as usual I guess ...

More Evidence of Obama's Fake Air War on ISIS

...
The Wall Street Journal supplied the latest evidence unintentionally, reporting on ISIS using Iraq’s Mosul University chemistry lab for bomb-making - the facility not struck by US air strikes despite claims otherwise.

It said the lab is used “to concoct a new generation of explosive devices (including chemical bombs and other chemical weapons) and train militants to make them” - citing US and Iraqi military sources familiar with what’s going on.

According to General Hatem Magsosi, “Iraq’s top explosives officer,” ISIS recruits “go to Raqqa (the group’s Syria stronghold), then to Mosul University…”

Alleged US airstrikes haven’t touched the facility. Its smart bombs aim elsewhere, targeting Iraqi infrastructure and government sites - supporting, not combating ISIS, the same scheme used in Syria against Assad.

US military spokesman in Iraq Col. Steve Warren lied claiming “we bombed them,” no additional details provided, no damage to the alleged sites struck.

Russian airstrikes could level the facility straightaway if ordered, eliminate it as a bomb-making threat.

When ISIS seized Mosul in summer 2014, it obtained 40 kilos of uranium compounds kept at the university’s lab, materials enabling it to produce terror weapons.

According to former CIA officer Jack Rice, the group has no known capability to enrich uranium, but could likely produce dirty bombs able to irradiate areas where detonated.

Washington has been well aware of ISIS’ Mosul University operations all along, yet has done nothing to stop them.

Claims of US warplanes bombing the facility are Big Lies. A few smart bombs from a single sortie could destroy it in short order.
...

a reply to: theultimatebelgianjoke

No surprise it once won the Holocaust cartoon contest of Teheran.

I love that you admit you followed the Iranian holocaust cartoon competition.

a reply to: theultimatebelgianjoke

More Evidence of Obama's Fake Air War on ISIS

I love how someone's opinionated blog is being used as something that should be considered as close to being true.

And what he writes is an opinion of his own and doesn't come close to actually being true.

And the fact he is a progressive news contributor also provides enough to know what this man is about.

Good try though, but you might want to try harder.

a reply to: tsurfer2000h

How about considering the facts that make him forge an 'opinion of his own' : the WSJ article and the previous contradicting White House statement ...

Try harder.

originally posted by: theultimatebelgianjoke
a reply to: tsurfer2000h

How about considering the facts that make him forge an 'opinion of his own' : the WSJ article and the previous contradicting White House statement ...

Try harder.

What makes you think the Americans are lying about bombing the University? The WSJ article clearly states that they have been. Why do you choose to believe part of what they say, but not all of it? Is the blogger posting from the University campus?

a reply to: DJW001

Because despite the US bombing claims - that are just repeated by the WSJ, General Hatem Magsosi, Iraq's top explosives officer, was quoted as saying that the facilities at the University of Mosul is still used by ISIS to 'teach' the jihadists.

originally posted by: theultimatebelgianjoke
a reply to: DJW001

Because despite the US bombing claims - that are just repeated by the WSJ, General Hatem Magsosi, Iraq's top explosives officer, was quoted as saying that the facilities at the University of Mosul is still used by ISIS to 'teach' the jihadists.

So nothing short of the complete obliteration of the University is in order?

a reply to: DJW001

US says : we bombed the thing ...
Iraqi says : thing still in place ...

Get the contradiction ?

They may have target it in the last weeks, but the original claim of its bombing was made by the US back in 2014. In the meantime, the thing was still in place.
Because in 2014 :

Coalition forces confirm airstrike on IS-held Turkish consulate in Mosul

The U.S. Department of Defense released a video on Saturday (April 2nd 2014) showing strikes in Mosul that hit an IS headquarters in the President's administration building at Mosul University,

a reply to: theultimatebelgianjoke

No, the US said we bombed one part of the thing, Iraq said another part of the thing is still in use.

a reply to: DJW001

Wasn't the Turkish consulate in Mosul bombed? my sources say that they bombed it. Not sure which Iraqi sources are saying that its still standing.

Zionism, Genocide and the Colonial Tradition in Contemporary Syria

The International Association of Genocide Scholars has accused ISIS of carrying out a genocide against Shiite Muslims, as well as Yazidis and Kurds in the Middle East. The Knights of Columbus has expressed concern about the militant Sunni organization’s efforts to expunge Christians from its Caliphate in Syria and Iraq. And US Secretary of State John Kerry has denounced ISIS for its genocidal nature, expressed, he says, “in what it says, what it believes, and what it does.” And yet, if given a choice between ISIS and Assad, Israel—a state which liberally invokes the Nazi anti-Jewish genocide to justify its existence—would take ISIS. At least, that’s what former Israeli ambassador to the United States and Knesset member, Michael Oren, says, and his view appears to be in the mainstream of Israeli strategic thought. Shimon Peres, when he was Israel’s president, anticipated Oren. He said he hoped the Syrian rebels—dominated by Al Qaeda and its progeny—would win.

Al Qaeda’s official branch in Syria, Jabhat al-Nusra, controls the Syrian border with Israel, and along the Golan Heights, the Israeli military coordinates with the Qaeda militants. Israeli military forces talk of having arrived at “an understanding” with a group Washington and its allies officially condemn as a terrorist organization, and of “familiarity” with Al Qaeda’s “forces on the ground.” The Israeli-Al Qaeda alliance is “extremely tactical,” Israeli military officials say. This hasn’t escaped the attention of the government in Damascus. Syrian President Bashar al-Assad told Foreign Affairs that the Israelis “are supporting the rebels in Syria.”

a reply to: theultimatebelgianjoke

And yet, if given a choice between ISIS and Assad, Israel—a state which liberally invokes the Nazi anti-Jewish genocide to justify its existence—would take ISIS. At least, that’s what former Israeli ambassador to the United States and Knesset member, Michael Oren, says,

Where does he actually say that? Are you just going to copypasta the same four year old statement again? He doesn't actually say what your blogger says he said, you know.