pH kills cancer and an update on my father-in-law who killed his cancer in 3 weeks!

a reply to: Pardon?

huh okay...

you know something else that is dangerous?
extreme bias which you show about cancer alternatives. Any stance as extreme as you are showing on anything is dangerous in general. Not for others, but for you and your view of the things you are being extremist about. Maybe you are missing out something which you would not otherwise if you would let your mind be more open to other ideas.

modern medical science is not the only source of medicine, if you cannot accept that it is okay, but other people have other ways.
Science does not understand everything yet, never probably will!
and that goes for medical treatments also. If people get cured with their alternative ways, i am sure happy to read about it if they shared their story. Just like in case of the OP.

We should be grateful that he was kind enough to share his experience and maybe it will work for some other poor soul when it will find that conventional treatments are not working...

Also intuition is golden, if you understand it and know how it work for you, than it will not misguide you as it is coming from THE source!
...just for the kicker, even modern science is saying that we should put more trust in it

www.psychologytoday.com...
www.sciencedaily.com...

a reply to: UniFinity

He and TerryDon have spent 33 pages attacking anyone and everyone on this thread who have any opinion that differs from theirs. Shills! You said it best, extremists and to be that extreme and spend that much time monitoring this thread for this long can only mean one thing, IMO of course.

a reply to: Rezlooper

We haven't been attacking the members. We have been showing everyone hows it's bogus and there's zero proof.

And, as evidenced by your post above, the only one attacking members, is you.

BTW. I'm still waiting on this proof you supposedly have.

originally posted by: Rezlooper
a reply to: Pardon?

What you've said is dangerous.. to try to tell people not to try treatments that work. It's reckless.

No it isn't.
They don't work. Prove they do.
Prove it in the same method conventional treatments have to go through as currently they're the only ones which can show efficacy.

We've spent the whole thread asking you to provide proof and you've danced around the replies.
I can only deduce that you're either making the whole thing up or...you're making the whole thing up.

And as for using the shill gambit, that tends to be the last resort when you've run out of arguments...

originally posted by: Rezlooper
a reply to: UniFinity

He and TerryDon have spent 33 pages attacking anyone and everyone on this thread who have any opinion that differs from theirs. Shills! You said it best, extremists and to be that extreme and spend that much time monitoring this thread for this long can only mean one thing, IMO of course.

So what's it mean since you're still posting?

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: Rezlooper
a reply to: Pardon?

What you've said is dangerous.. to try to tell people not to try treatments that work. It's reckless.

Can you prove (yes, prove) that they work? No, you can't. You can give stories of them working, but you have failed, for 33 pages, to actually prove it works.

He also failed spectacularly when he tried to discuss the mechanism of action let alone show proof.
And the fact that he actually did try to describe it shows how desperate he was to get people to believe him.
The usual trick of state something then throw in some pseudo-science to try to fool the people.

Shameful.

a reply to: Rezlooper

yeah, don't give it to much thought or negativity, it is what it is...

from your other posts and threads that i have read, i know, that you are very smart person and do not use ats for spreading nonsense or lies. So for what is worth, for the ones who will need extra info in the future you have provided a great service, with your view and experience...everyone can check your posting history on their own to get some image of you.

The main point is that your family has greatly benefited, that is the most awesome proof you need, in my opinion and it would be great if more people would share their stories with such detail that you did here!

Sooo, please keep on posting on ats and continue adding to its quality and diversity. Thanks Rez for your past, present and also future contributions.

originally posted by: Pardon?

originally posted by: Rezlooper
a reply to: Pardon?

What you've said is dangerous.. to try to tell people not to try treatments that work. It's reckless.

No it isn't.
They don't work. Prove they do.
Prove it in the same method conventional treatments have to go through as currently they're the only ones which can show efficacy.

We've spent the whole thread asking you to provide proof and you've danced around the replies.
I can only deduce that you're either making the whole thing up or...you're making the whole thing up.

And as for using the shill gambit, that tends to be the last resort when you've run out of arguments...

In the original thread I published his medical records, his diagnosis and later results. That's enough, but obviously not for you. Tell me how I should prove it any further on this internet forum. Will the medical establishment publish my report in their journals? Tell me how.

originally posted by: UniFinity
a reply to: Rezlooper

yeah, don't give it to much thought or negativity, it is what it is...

from your other posts and threads that i have read, i know, that you are very smart person and do not use ats for spreading nonsense or lies. So for what is worth, for the ones who will need extra info in the future you have provided a great service, with your view and experience...everyone can check your posting history on their own to get some image of you.

The main point is that your family has greatly benefited, that is the most awesome proof you need, in my opinion and it would be great if more people would share their stories with such detail that you did here!

Sooo, please keep on posting on ats and continue adding to its quality and diversity. Thanks Rez for your past, present and also future contributions.

Thanks for that. Most people on ATS are decent folks but unfortunately, you do have these guys with their obvious agendas that just won't go away. He asks why I'm still posting, lol. It is my thread. Why is he still posting?

originally posted by: Rezlooper
He and TerryDon have spent 33 pages attacking anyone and everyone on this thread...

How is asking you to back up your claims 'attacking'? Are you that tinned skinned that people cannot ask you for proof? Try answering the question for once.

a reply to: Rezlooper

So, instead of posting any sort of proof, you just decide to attack us and throw accusations at us?

As for your proof? I'm still waiting.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: Rezlooper
He and TerryDon have spent 33 pages attacking anyone and everyone on this thread...

How is asking you to back up your claims 'attacking'? Are you that tinned skinned that people cannot ask you for proof? Try answering the question for once.

I've backed up how many pages - in two threads. Instead of asking stupid questions, peeps should take time to read through it then rather than ask the same thing over and over again. I've backed up my threads over and over again. I'm done with that now, it's time to go back and read it.

a reply to: TerryDon79

You're still here?

originally posted by: Rezlooper

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: Rezlooper
He and TerryDon have spent 33 pages attacking anyone and everyone on this thread...

How is asking you to back up your claims 'attacking'? Are you that tinned skinned that people cannot ask you for proof? Try answering the question for once.

I've backed up how many pages - in two threads. Instead of asking stupid questions, peeps should take time to read through it then rather than ask the same thing over and over again. I've backed up my threads over and over again. I'm done with that now, it's time to go back and read it.

No, you haven't. All you have done is post testimonials. Testimonials aren't proof. If they were then that would make Santa, the Easter bunny, elves, wizards and gnomes real.

originally posted by: Rezlooper
a reply to: TerryDon79

You're still here?

I'm going to be here all the time that useless psuedo-science cures are being pushed. Denying ignorance and all that.

originally posted by: Rezlooper
I've backed up how many pages - in two threads. Instead of asking stupid questions, peeps should take time to read through it then rather than ask the same thing over and over again. I've backed up my threads over and over again. I'm done with that now, it's time to go back and read it.

Personal anecdotal instances is not 'back up'. You have yet to provide specific information on how you measured blood pH which would provide actual evidence of this alleged methods efficacy.

When you posts that peeps can read it and not get all stoopid, yo. Ya feel me?

(That was rhetorical, I know you do)

originally posted by: Rezlooper

originally posted by: Pardon?

originally posted by: Rezlooper
a reply to: Pardon?

What you've said is dangerous.. to try to tell people not to try treatments that work. It's reckless.

No it isn't.
They don't work. Prove they do.
Prove it in the same method conventional treatments have to go through as currently they're the only ones which can show efficacy.

We've spent the whole thread asking you to provide proof and you've danced around the replies.
I can only deduce that you're either making the whole thing up or...you're making the whole thing up.

And as for using the shill gambit, that tends to be the last resort when you've run out of arguments...

In the original thread I published his medical records, his diagnosis and later results. That's enough, but obviously not for you. Tell me how I should prove it any further on this internet forum. Will the medical establishment publish my report in their journals? Tell me how.

If he had been cured of cancer and has had confirmation of such, knowing what oncologists and doctors in general are like, they would want to write the case up and delve deeper.
Has his oncologist done that?
Even just a case report in a medical journal would be something to start off with.
Doctors love stuff like that.

So you don't need to prove it on this internet forum.
Yet you keep coming back trying to justify yourself.
But just to reiterate, no I don't believe what you're saying is the truth as you've tripped yourself up many times in this thread so I don't think that you could actually offer any real proof.
You can't recover from what you've stated.
Prove me wrong though, I don't mind being wrong.

originally posted by: Rezlooper
a reply to: TerryDon79

You're still here?

when you do present evidence to them they have the tendency to just say they are untrustworthy internet sites and then completely ignore the documented proof that you have found.

Turpentine is a great cancer cure as it kills fungus anyone that has had cancer should be taking this twice a week about 2.5 grams
Sodium bicarbonate inhibits the yeast fermentation process which feeds the cancer cells,
the body uses Iodine to kill cancer

a reply to: jinni73

Apart from cancer isn't a fungus.

And, no "credible sites" have been linked to. Testimonials aren't proof of squat.

How about learning biology before trying to kill people?

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: jinni73

Apart from cancer isn't a fungus.

And, no "credible sites" have been linked to. Testimonials aren't proof of squat.

How about learning biology before trying to kill people?

Believe me pal you are the only one trying to kill people with your ignorance If anyone spends half an hours research on the net they can clearly find the death rate for chemotherapy

chemotherapy kills 50% of all people within a year and 98% are dead within 5 years the drugs kill them not the cancer

if you know it does not work why on earth are you bothering to comment on the matter, you have made it perfectly clear you would rather let someone die than try an alternative route.

I have shown you credible evidence before that was presented in the top journals of its time and you come out with its not a credible site. so don't ask me to waste my time when we have already gone down that path.

If people do get cancer and don't want to do the research themselves or ask others who are experienced in this field and have read about this subject and then do the research on what they advise then so be it you can take your chances with the devil.

please do not call me a murderer when I have saved tens of thousands of lives on this planet

and in a percentage of cases turpentine from pine trees does indeed kill cancer, other terpenes that are also very good for killing cancer include THC and CBD which are found in the cannabis plant these are actually more potent than the pine tree terpenes but they all work, you would need to take around 5 grams a day of these oils, but there are people that are so fixated on a completely corrupt system that they cannot see the wood through the trees


oh and the turpentine information is from a pharmacist and a top oncologist here in sunny Australia so stick that in your pipe and smoke it.