Iowa Caucus Discussion.

a reply to: clay2 baraka

The feed I am watching is SDE based... and right now... at 95.1% reporting

Clinton 665SDE 50%

Sanders 662SDE 50%


...

a reply to: Kali74

Because he's U.S. Senator from Vermont. How does that make him "anti-establishment" I'll never know.

a reply to: JacKatMtn

Have a link?

I'm done for the night and would like to listen-in while I enjoy a nice beer.

a reply to: introvert

Check earlier in the thread.. like my first post here.. I linked to a wash post live blog deal with a live tally feed...

I will track it down in a couple, if you can't find it...

FTR... just witnessed on FNC... Charles Krauthammer just said... it's now a 3 man race... (GOP side), with NO establishment candidates.. then goes on to push Rubio...

I ain't buying what Charles is trying to sell...


(off to find that link)

a reply to: introvert

I've got one for Fox News (live streaming) if you want??

vaughnlive.tv...

All the fuss over 6 electoral votes?
6 votes that will probably go to the gop anyway?
These talking heads are full of crap.
This means very little,
Gop split 3 ways
Dems split 2 ways

Little off topic but seems to me we have two choices...a fascist state or a socialist state.

a reply to: shooterbrody

So Carson and Rand are out?

a reply to: introvert

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Thanks guys.

Watching now.

Wish people would tone down the insults down a bit. I know Hillary is hated but it's kind of annoying having to read 5 or 6 insults per page hurled towards her.

Stay classy ATS

Surprised Sanders is doing so well. If he can keep his supporters this active then we might have some real change on our hands this election

a reply to: John_Rodger_Cornman

They are not out but no talking head mentioned their names they got lumped together as those who got less than double digits.
Huckabee took his warchest and went home as did O'Malley.

originally posted by: muse7
Wish people would tone down the insults down a bit. I know Hillary is hated but it's kind of annoying having to read 5 or 6 insults per page hurled towards her.

Stay classy ATS

Surprised Sanders is doing so well. If he can keep his supporters this active then we might have some real change on our hands this election

No one wants another Bush or Clinton in office.

still creeping towards 96% on the DEM side

95.7% reporting


Clinton 668SDE 50%

Sanders 665SDE 50%


Meanwhile the GOP side is now.. 98.5% reporting

Cruz 28%
Trump 24%
Rubio 23%
Carson 9%

originally posted by: JacKatMtn
still creeping towards 96% on the DEM side

95.7% reporting


Clinton 668SDE 50%

Sanders 665SDE 50%


Meanwhile the GOP side is now.. 98.5% reporting

Cruz 28%
Trump 24%
Rubio 23%
Carson 9%

I'm surprised the GOP were so organized this go-round. Last time it was a complete disaster and they had trouble with the simple caucus procedures.

a reply to: John_Rodger_Cornman

That's understandable, but there's a smart way and a dumb way to prove that you don't support a certain politician.

originally posted by: Teddy916
a reply to: Kali74

Because he's U.S. Senator from Vermont. How does that make him "anti-establishment" I'll never know.

Who has fought against the establishment his entire political career. Just because he's in the "game" doesn't mean he's playing it. He's the one trying to flip the game board. Well documented. Check it out, if you want actual facts.

"669 [Clinton] -666 [Sanders] at the moment. Two precincts were decided on a coin toss (and by luck went to Clinton) -- means current disparity was literally decided by the flip of a coin."

www.reddit.com...

I believe there's still precincts actually caucusing and that's why the results are taking so long. I might have to go to bed and try to sleep, I have to be at 5 est.

a reply to: JacKatMtn

Surprised Carson did so well.

I expected Trump to flop. His disrespect to the female host and dodging the tough questions hurt him. I just wanted to know if it was Cruz or Rubio to pull ahead of him. I thought Rand would have at least polled at 10%.