I am in utter disbelief that this 'Flat-Earth' nonsense has gained some attention

a reply to: TheFaceOfTheEarth

Why don't you and the OTHER flat Earthers jump of VERY HIGH buildings we can then see if you land at the base of the buildings you jumped from or if it raced away from you, oh and let us know were to send the flowers for the funeral

a reply to: wmd_2008

Why don't you and the OTHER flat Earthers jump of VERY HIGH buildings we can then see if you land at the base of the buildings you jumped from or if it raced away from you

But noone denies this.This is perfectly logical on a motionless Earth.

Here you go flat Earthers

Earth Curvature

Exif data for picture focal length 50mm f13 1/800 sec iso 200 Nikon D4

Full frame DSLR 50mm lens similar field of view to your eye CURVATURE clearly visible.

Moon image from Norther Hemisphere one of my own



Moon image from southern hemisphere.

Moon from Southern Hemisphere

So want to explain how the Moon is opposite way up in the Southern Hemisphere compared to the
Northern Hemisphere if the world is a flat disc

Here so you don't have to tax your brains to much

a reply to: wmd_2008

So gravity is a force not only pulling objects directly down to the center of the Earth, but also pulls objects in the sky along, in sync with Earth's rotation.

So does it require more force for objects to move in the opposite direction? I can see how objects in contact with the surface would be moving along with the spinning Earth, there is friction with the surface. According to your logic the air must be causing the same amount of friction as the surface.

Objects in the air are being pulled along in sync with Earth's rotation? Do snowflakes fall straight down?

a reply to: wmd_2008

Here you go flat Earthers

Who was talking about the moon?

originally posted by: TheFaceOfTheEarth
a reply to: wmd_2008

So gravity is a force not only pulling objects directly down to the center of the Earth, but also pulls objects in the sky along, in sync with Earth's rotation.

So does it require more force for objects to move in the opposite direction? I can see how objects in contact with the surface would be moving along with the spinning Earth, there is friction with the surface. According to your logic the air must be causing the same amount of friction as the surface.

Objects in the air are being pulled along in sync with Earth's rotation? Do snowflakes fall straight down?

NO according to YOUR logic that's the case even in vacuum the objects are pulled with the rotation.

Are snowflakes affected by air currents What about you falling or rocks for example.

originally posted by: TheFaceOfTheEarth
a reply to: wmd_2008

Here you go flat Earthers

Who was talking about the moon?

We are talking about how it looks to observers on different sides of a GLOBE which is what we see so what about a flat Earth or will you AVOID this because this one simple fact pee's on the flat Earth parade

a reply to: wmd_2008

NO according to YOUR logic that's the case even in vacuum the objects are pulled with the rotation.

How does this happen?

So does it require more force to travel in the opposite direction then?

Are snowflakes affected by air currents What about you falling or rocks for example.

If gravity is pulling objects in one direction as you claim, how can objects floating in the sky go in any other direction?

a reply to: TheFaceOfTheEarth

now is the time to learn about " relative velocity "

a reply to: TheFaceOfTheEarth

relative velocity

a reply to: ignorant_ape

If you have a point to make regarding relative velocity that explains this, make it.

originally posted by: Cauliflower
a reply to: Corruptedstructure


They have to keep the truth about gravity secret.
Even the ancients knew how to construct a bomb.
We are all familiar with radiant energy but when energy resonates in different dimensions it acquires that spooky property we call mass. How can you explain that while maintaining non proliferation of WMD?

Depends on your perception of a WMD..

a reply to: TheFaceOfTheEarth

yes i have - and the lesson requireds that YOU furnish your understanding of what relative velocity is - its quite simple

and your refusal to answer nails your dishonesty - because otherwise you would just tell us

a reply to: ignorant_ape

I'm good. Explain how relative velocity explains it. You keep bringing it up. Apply it.

a reply to: TheFaceOfTheEarth

once you have told us what " relative velocity " means - then we shall proceed

we have been at this point before - your craven refusal to state any actual position is getting boring

now - heres your chance - " relative velocity " is ????????????????

a reply to: ignorant_ape

once you have told us what " relative velocity " means - then we shall proceed

Then "we" shall not proceed. It's not a point I am trying to make.

originally posted by: TheFaceOfTheEarth
a reply to: ignorant_ape

once you have told us what " relative velocity " means - then we shall proceed

Then "we" shall not proceed. It's not a point I am trying to make.

Yet another point that PEE'S on the flat Earth parade so want to explain how the Moon sholud look like from your flat Earth

a reply to: wmd_2008

I responded to one specific claim. I don't need to discuss anything else here, at this moment. Why are you changing the topic of discussion?

originally posted by: TheFaceOfTheEarth
a reply to: wmd_2008

I responded to one specific claim. I don't need to discuss anything else here, at this moment. Why are you changing the topic of discussion?

We are discussing a flat or globe Earth, I have given PHOTORAPHIC PROOF ot the GLOBE now show they are wrong if you can't your flat Earth fails.

flat earthers : how far away from the alledged " plane of the earth " is the moon - its a simple question

cann any one answer it ?