It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: EvilAxis
Interesting info there Skeptic.
Whether there is a single "credible source... with confirmed evidence" of aliens, chemtrails or paranormal activities, amongst the other big topics discussed here, is a matter of debate. I'm sure you weren't suggesting that as a reason to shut down a topic.
originally posted by: FlyingFox
I don't want to cast any stones, and upset anyone, but...
One idea I had on how to deal with posters who seem to have too much of an agenda, as-if they were compensated shills or otherwise troublemakers,
originally posted by: ParasuvO
For instance, on the topic of collapsing buildings, I can look at them and see no collapse is ever happening, but a totally obliterating vaporizing exploding building.
originally posted by: hellobruce
Yet engineers and other professionals can look at the same pictures and see the catastrophic failure of the building as a result of a plane crashing into it and unchecked fires.
originally posted by: wildb
I did not say no one could get into the lobby, I said the lobby was already destroyed. Before the first plane hit..
originally posted by: hellobruce
what he saw was just some elevators hitting the ground floor after the plane hit.
What gives you the authority to dismiss an eye witness account and tell us what he saw?
This simply dismissal is why we are not having a proper honest open debate about 9/11. I admire your total dedication in presenting the official narrative to members here. But sometimes being too dedicated can lead people to be blindsided by a particular view and become ignorant of relevant information.
The guy said he thinks a bomb went off in the lobby before the plane hit, other witnesses say the same thing. That means there was some type of sound replicating that of a bomb that went off BEFORE the planes hit. This eye witness testimony is paramount and can be used in a court of law. Yet your "opinion" of what he actually saw would not be used because you were not there and you do not know what he saw.