It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Playing super sleuth and trying to track down every single person's IP address that is suspected of being a shill by those who do not like to have their opinions challenged is tedious, time consuming and wasteful.
Let us assume for the sake of argument that there are paid shills. So what? What do they do? They post. What do they post? Opinions and/or facts. Are those opinions and/or facts true or false? It is up to them to provide reasons/evidence why they are true and up to the people who disagree with them to post reasons/evidence why they are not true. The membership at large can make up their mind as to the validity of said reasons and/or evidence based on how well it is presented or explained.
originally posted by: HardBoiled
Sure, this info is readily available to the people operating the site.
Right, as if it is not a fact they exist.
Second, this is not about ATS members being able to make up their mind, this is about a source of frustration that causes friction.
I seriously doubt that no more than a few people on this site are able to do this and once again, it is a waste of time.
I have yet to see anyone definitively outed as a 'paid shill'. All I see are silly accusations because people get upset that someone else does not agree with them.
Sure it is. If this so called 'paid shill' is presenting facts and evidence that no one else can disprove or rebut what is the issue? The only people I see getting frustrated are those who do not like to get their opinion challenged and resort to rather juvenile tactics.
I have yet to see anyone definitively outed as a 'paid shill'.
Right, as if it is not a fact they exist.
originally posted by: HardBoiled
It is very easy...
Nice circular logic there.... I am proposing doing more to identify organised efforts, then you shoot it down and use the argument that you never saw a paid shill outed......I mean, you never will if you oppose such action will you?
Try to use some straight logic next time ok?
Facts and evidence are no gaurantee that there is no organised and malevolent intent behind them, nor does it mean that someone is not trolling trying to stifle discussion. Maybe you are not aware of that.
The biggest problem within the universe of "9/11 Conspiracies" is that nothing of substance, from a conspiracy standpoint, has been proven.
The biggest problem within the universe of "9/11 Conspiracies" is that nothing of substance, from a conspiracy standpoint, has been proven.
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
a reply to: SkepticOverlord
I think that biggest problem on the 9/11 forum is like I say people don't want to admit when they are wrong, namely those who refute the official historical narrative of 9/11.
The problem as I see it is those who have seen a few Youtube videos and wade in on debate thinking they are experts who seem to get very offended when their mistakes and inaccuracies are pointed out by those who know what they are talking about
I do also take your point that the terms OSer and Truther are used as insluts at times and as such should not be used in 9/11 discussions. I personally would regard myself as a 9/11 truther in the purest sense that i am a person who seeks the truth behind what happened on 9/11.
I personally would hate to have my account terminated because in the heat of a debate i use the word "truther" out of habit.
A lot of people are unaware (because I rarely mention it) that I was one of the first "Truthers." I was part of the meetings in the basement of St. Mark's church in NYC which eventually became known as "9/11 Truth." At the time, we had no name, and the goal was to get signatures on a petition to treat the attacks as a crime, close the crime scene, get a proper investigation started, and examine the broader breakdown of national security. We were getting close to 100,000 signatures when disruptive elements infiltrated the group with extremist interpretations of the (now proven wrong) conspiracy theories of The Frenchman and WebFairy. The person leading the infiltration was later outed as a government contractor, following orders, as a defense when arrested. But it didn't matter, the "search for truth" had been forever polluted by lies.
Right there is an actual confirmed 9/11 conspiracy that has seen little, if any, real examination.