It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: SLAYER69
The forum in discussion was one of the ones that drew me to ATS in the first place. After joining and reading Pro, Con, This, That or the other opinions, threads more often than not would deteriorate to mud slinging, name calling with facts and interesting information on either side being shoved aside and it became very apparent for me a forum to avoid.
It has stayed that way for most of my years here at ATS.
Sad really.
originally posted by: ParasuvO
Lastly, they show us that we really have no control over our reality, because the rest of the masses are so hopelessly programmed one way or another, that they are unable to make clear informed decisions.
originally posted by: ParasuvO
For instance, on the topic of collapsing buildings, I can look at them and see no collapse is ever happening, but a totally obliterating vaporizing exploding building.
I am shocked that people would ever believe an event like this COULD ever be civilly talked about.
originally posted by: hellobruce
It appears some people just want to believe it was a conspiracy, no matter what the evidence shows.
a reply to: SkepticOverlord If I had my wish, you would apply strict T&C rules to all of ATS. It might just become a little closer to the place for intelligent discussion and fun that it once was. I don't have any hope that time will turn backward, nor do I want it to, but I am not a member of Twitter, Facebook or any other social media for a reason... I would love to have a good reason to be an active member here again. And the one difference between all the others and ATS is the T&Cs and the implementation thereof.
originally posted by: hellobruce
It appears some people just want to believe it was a conspiracy, no matter what the evidence shows.
con·spir·a·cy
noun
a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful.
originally posted by: hellobruce
originally posted by: ParasuvO
For instance, on the topic of collapsing buildings, I can look at them and see no collapse is ever happening, but a totally obliterating vaporizing exploding building.
Yet engineers and other professionals can look at the same pictures and see the catastrophic failure of the building as a result of a plane crashing into it and unchecked fires.
Some people have been told this was due to explosives, or mini nuclear weapons etc. so they find themselves convinced that is what it was, whilst ignoring the experts, as what the experts know does not fit the reality they have created.
It appears some people just want to believe it was a conspiracy, no matter what the evidence shows.
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: hellobruce
It appears some people just want to believe it was a conspiracy, no matter what the evidence shows.
I'll just quote SO in response:
"Why is that?
Because no credible source has investigated the more plausible theories that are in conflict with the "Official Story."
www.abovetopsecret.com...
The irritating thing in this maddening massive topic of 9/11 Conspiracies is that it's possible to accept major aspects of the "Official Story" and still propose/investigate 9/11 conspiracy theories.
The biggest being the very real possibility that the majority of "9/11 conspiracy theories" were created by government operators to ensure the real conspiracies were never investigated. Information on "The Frenchman," who literally started it all before the Web Fairy, has been purged from the Internet. There was solid information that he was working at a PR firm connected to US clandestine agencies. The majority of "no plane", "TV fakery", "missile at the pentagon", and "bombs in the WTC" began with his videos.
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
I remember realizing the first tower was "vaporizing"
It was shocking and unexpected because, structurally speaking, the tower appeared completely stable until it suddenly vaporized.
At 9:30 am, a FDNY Chief Officer inside WTC 1 feels the building move and makes the decision that the building is no longer safe. • At 9:49 am, NYPD helicopters provide a radio report stating that “large pieces” are falling from WTC 2. • At 10:07 am, NYPD aviation units warn that WTC 1 may collapse. • At 10:20 am, NYPD aviation unit reports that WTC 1 is leaning to the south. Source FDNY Assistant Chief Joseph Callan: "Approximately 40 minutes after I arrived in the lobby, I made a decision that the building was no longer safe. And that was based on the conditions in the lobby, large pieces of plaster falling, all the 20 foot high glass panels on the exterior of the lobby were breaking. There was obvious movement of the building, and that was the reason on the handy talky I gave the order for all Fire Department units to leave the north tower." Source Callan: "For me to make the decision to take our firefighters out of the building with civilians still in it, that was very tough for me, but I did that because I did not think the building was safe any longer, and that was just prior to 9:30."–Source
Never even occurred to me that the buildings might fall that day. I remember realizing the first tower was "vaporizing" before the reporter I was watching realized what was happening. It was shocking and unexpected because, structurally speaking, the tower appeared completely stable until it suddenly vaporized.
originally posted by: hellobruce
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
I remember realizing the first tower was "vaporizing"
The building was not vaporised...
It was shocking and unexpected because, structurally speaking, the tower appeared completely stable until it suddenly vaporized.
No, from a poor definition video it may have looked like that, but on the ground the professionals knew it was not stable.
At 9:30 am, a FDNY Chief Officer inside WTC 1 feels the building move and makes the decision that the building is no longer safe. • At 9:49 am, NYPD helicopters provide a radio report stating that “large pieces” are falling from WTC 2. • At 10:07 am, NYPD aviation units warn that WTC 1 may collapse. • At 10:20 am, NYPD aviation unit reports that WTC 1 is leaning to the south. Source FDNY Assistant Chief Joseph Callan: "Approximately 40 minutes after I arrived in the lobby, I made a decision that the building was no longer safe. And that was based on the conditions in the lobby, large pieces of plaster falling, all the 20 foot high glass panels on the exterior of the lobby were breaking. There was obvious movement of the building, and that was the reason on the handy talky I gave the order for all Fire Department units to leave the north tower." Source Callan: "For me to make the decision to take our firefighters out of the building with civilians still in it, that was very tough for me, but I did that because I did not think the building was safe any longer, and that was just prior to 9:30."–Source
And that was based on the conditions in the lobby, large pieces of plaster falling, all the 20 foot high glass panels on the exterior of the lobby were breaking.
a reply to: ParasuvO
What I discovered was, the people had actually been programmed in the months afterwards, by all manner of propaganda, to not even SEE the towers falling.