40% of black voters and 45% of Hispanic voters support Donald Trump..historic GOP numbers!

originally posted by: muse7
I'm not going to try and debunk the poll, because everyone with an IQ above 70 knows this poll is BS

But anyway, I find it extremely sad that Donald Trump has a large fan base on this website, a website which motto is "Deny Ignorance"

My heart breaks for your sadness. But, ive been listening to the whole thing, not just misrepresented bs by the major media, so ill go with a misrepresented trump over a socialist that will make me poor so somebody else who doesnt work can have what i earned while inferring im racist every 5 seconds because of my skin color. (Ironic isnt it) The core of the pc liberal philosophy is hatred of white men (self guilting if you are one)

Trump has a Black Spokesperson...and a woman (who is smoking HOT btw)....Katrina Pierson www.theroot.com... rson_far.jpg.crop.rtstoryvarlarge.jpg.CROP.rtstoryvar-large.jpg.crop.rtstoryvarlarge.jpg

He travels with Jamiel Shaw, who is a personal friend of his as appears at many rallies ktla.com...

The "Stump for Trump Sisters" who are a huge hit on YouTube. They appeared at his rally and he (gasp) HUGGED and KISSED them...OMG www.youtube.com...

this is just the beginning of Trumps campaign...yet no other candidate on either side shows this amount of Black people anywhere NEAR a campaign.

The Democrats are starkly lily WHITE almost all through. Huma Abedin is quite literally the most 'ethnic' of anyone seen in public with Hillary.

a reply to: matafuchs

I am not trying to sell anything...I am simply posting the truth. I am not skewing numbers. I am simply stating what is there.

Do you believe a poll with ten minority respondents are enough to make this statement as you did in the OP?

that minorities are fully behind Trump

Hardly the truth based on a poll of 10 people.

The rest has nothing to do with the thread. We can debate it somewhere else but not here.

Then why did you bring it up?

I am not caving but I feel like the derail is here and you are pushing it hard.

So you are caving.

I got ya.

I think in this case we can agree to disagree.

No. You are wrong, base your information on garbage polls and are creating threads based on the desires of propagandists...not facts.

You like Trump? More power to ya, but don't try to sell bull# information to others when the poll is so easily debunked. Put a little more effort in to forming a political opinion.

a reply to: introvert

I tried. You got nothing. I am not caving. I am simply deciding not to continue a conversation you simply want to derail.

Does it really matter if it is 10 or 100? or 1000? You would toss it aside no matter what.

Again with the insults. Telling me to put a little more effort into it. Man, did mama not pay you enough attention as a kid?

It is a fact. Not propoganda. So, you are saying that out of 10, 4 did not say yes? So they actually decided to make something up and use 4 people. If they were doing that, I am sure they would have padded it larger.

So tell me which polls should we pay attention to? What poll in your 'opinion' is not garbage. Let me guess..one that fits your political views.

a reply to: matafuchs

I am simply deciding not to continue a conversation you simply want to derail.

Because in your own words, "you got nothing".

Does it really matter if it is 10 or 100? or 1000? You would toss it aside no matter what.

When it comes to statistical information, it matters quite a bit. Do you understand how statistics work?

Again with the insults. Telling me to put a little more effort into it. Man, did mama not pay you enough attention as a kid?

You need to do better when your ship is sinking.

It is a fact. Not propoganda.

It's propaganda from a known propaganda outlet.

Didn't you know WND is a snake-oil salesmen?

So, you are saying that out of 10, 4 did not say yes?

No. What I am saying is that such a small number of respondents does not make for a valid poll.

If they were doing that, I am sure they would have padded it larger.

Why would they need to pad it when people such as yourself will believe it, like a parent telling their children Santa Claus is real?

So tell me which polls should we pay attention to? What poll in your 'opinion' is not garbage. Let me guess..one that fits your political views.

Believe none of them. If your position is entirely dependent upon # polls, then your position is #.

Wow. Any one that reads and believes the op:


I have a fckn bridge on the moon for you to buy. Pm me.

a reply to: matafuchs

Have to call you out on your 9/11 comment. Even though you had some decent points alot of fire fighters know the official 911 story is bogus, cops as well. Maybe the millenial firefighters and cops of today are ignorant morons, i haven't met many firefighters but i have some cops i work with and its usually the older ones and the veterans who are wiser and more informed.

Trump seems genuine but it would be the greatest conjob in history if he gets in and protects the status quo, the military industrial complex, the secret government etc.. When the truth probably is closer to the fact that we don't need money in our society at all and every person in the world could have a place to live, food to eat, plenty of energy to run their homes/lives. We are a way off from that.

Just like ex military, the retired ones are the ones who are on the right track most of the time. This will probably be marked as off topic. Anyway I'm replying since nobody spoke up about that little "thermite" retort you had, I had to and I hardly ever post here anymore since politics is 90% of this site nowadays and it's a giant cesspit. You actually get better talk about topics on youtube comments nowadays it seems. Where the disinfo agents are easily outweighed by the masses, and the other guy doesn't get to "be right" just by speaking louder.

Sanders I have to research more, but he seems like he could be one of those dark horse JFK types that the establishment will attempt to discredit. Trump would definitely be a powerful candidate but I don't know what to make of the way he talks some times and I don't know if I trust him. Rand Paul probably has no chance at winning realistically, although I think he would be a decent president. I think he has kind of gone along to get along with the GOP so he would have a chance to run for 2016, and he had to shed the association to his father or else they would think he was another Ron Paul and marginalize him. But he should have spoken up louder in the debates and had a greater message than "I'm the only conservative" which isn't a bad message but you have to reach out to both sides of the aisle if you want to win an election, you need to turn heads and get people from all walks of life to resonate with your message and I don't think he did that.

a reply to: introvert

So if we are to believe no polls why are you attempting to discredit this one?

originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: introvert

So if we are to believe no polls why are you attempting to discredit this one?

Because you believe it.

a reply to: smarterthanyou

My cousin was part of '214' , the nuthouse, so i have to disagree with the 9/11 comments. He passed that day. I also have a few other family members who are LEO's in NYPD and some PANY workers and none of them feel anything other than tragedy but that is another thread.

Read Sanders book, the 'Outsider' one, and you will see his plans. I did. it is better to be educated by the thoughts of those you do not agree with than simply ignore.

It will be interesting when Trump starts his 'paid' media blitz in 2016.

Im latino, and outta the bullspit establishment politicians, Trump is my favorite.
I still would never vote for a namebrand canditate, but if I had to, it would be him.

Edit: I forgot about Rand Paul. He comes first. But Trump makes a lot of sense. Too bad he's lying. He's the Republican version of "Change We Can All Believe In"
Dont buy it, people.
Vote Rand Paul, or Jesse Ventura!

I bet I could poll 10 ten people, and get four of them to believe that our lord and Creator - Lord Chtulu, hailing from the 7th dimension existing within th Plaideian Cluster, with his ArchDuke Reese's Peanut Butter Cup.

Then, I should make a thread, "40% of humanity believes in Lord Chtulu!"

Ten people were polled for this, "study."

I have nothing else to add.

... if I weren't married, I'd date my daughter.

originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: introvert

So if we are to believe no polls why are you attempting to discredit this one?

Polls are used to get a general consensus of an issue.

TYPICALLY, more than ten people are polled, however.

This is nothing more than a piece of propoganda.

Kind of like when Trump and his crew were sharing Facebook memes - originating from an orginization that doesn't/never has existed regarding "black," violence - that actually originated from a Neo-Nazi group.

Or the newest one I've seen - a picture of Bernie Sanders, with a quote from Adolf Hitler - except for the quote comes from Gregor Strassor.

But hey - let's not those little things like facts, common sense, and attempted objectivity interject themselves into the game of tricks that is politics.

To those who think Donnie is "anti-establishment," that is exactly what the "Hope and Change," crowd preached about.

The only thing is, "this time, it'll be different!"

Donnie promises, and he'd never go against his words!

originally posted by: Tsubaki
Wow. Any one that reads and believes the op:


I have a fckn bridge on the moon for you to buy. Pm me.

Can you gather ten people that are in support of your idea, then nationally proclaim, "40% of humanity plans on purchasing and building a bridge on the moon!"

I mean, abiding by the logic of this poll, it's unequivocally truthful.

a reply to: RomeByFire

400 people were polled. Is it the fault of those polling that only 10 were black?

originally posted by: matafuchs
a reply to: RomeByFire

400 people were polled. Is it the fault of those polling that only 10 were black?

You're completely missing my point.

Ten black folks were polled.

Four of them supporters.

Four hundred people total. Fair enough.

But honestly, is four black folks out of ten, "historic GOP records!"?

That, my friend, is a reach - and that's a crude understatement. I have no quarrel with the validity of this poll, granted I'm skeptical of ALL polls, nor the number of people that are polled, but this is clearly narrarated to push a certain agenda.

But oh noes! That would never happen! Donnie isn't a career-politician - yet hey man, take his word - not mine, he's all about buying politicians and openly admits to have done it in the past.

This is hyperbolized and used to push my narrative, but if you're hiring a babysitter, would you hire someone that admits to molesting children, but hey - it was in the past? As I said, this IS purposefully hyperbolized, but it demonstrates my point.

Donnie is playing on the relevant issues on today's media to garner support and attention, and he uses much of the same banter and rhetoric that have been used in virtually every other election.

Four years ago, Democrats and Republicans complained about problems and promised to fix them.
For years before that, Democrats and Republicand complained about problems
And promised to fix them.
Four years before that, Democrats and Republicans complained about problems and promised to fix them.
For years before that....

Why do we still have problems? What happened to everything both Republican and Democrat presidents said?

Ah - forget it, it's just the fault of the last guy, "but this time, it'll be different!"

originally posted by: matafuchs
40% of black voters and 45% of Hispanic voters support Donald Trump..historic GOP numbers!

Misogynists club meeting!

a reply to: matafuchs

Heh..no. They asked a whooping 10 black people and 31 Hispanic folks, compared to 398 white people. 10 black folks isnt a sample size, its cherry picking your results.

This so called survey isnt woth the paper it was written on.

a reply to: MystikMushroom

Anytime before the 1960s f'in sucked if you were a black american.

America wasnt great then. So like you, I'd like to know when it was great.

It looks like the survey was rigged (poorly written / misleading wording) and poorly done (the sample size wasn't large enough to represent the population) it is too bad that surveys are so complicated to get right. It often takes looking at the source material to get to the bottom of how accurate a survey is.