Fascism is Not Right Wing, it is socialist.

a reply to: neo96

Broad generalizations...... nothing more.

originally posted by: GamleGamle
a reply to: neo96

Broad generalizations...... nothing more.

The only broad generalization here is what socialists do.

Rob from the haves give to the have not's all so the have not's can go out, and buy more corporate products.

With a federal state guarantee.

a reply to: ErrorErrorError

Keep going.

There's hundreds of Left Wing sources that provide hundreds of definitions that fit perfectly into the Left Wing agendas.

Next try the wikipedia "Fascism"

nobody seems to be able to verify any of the [bracketed] sources at the bottom !!!!!

Great rock-solid definition with weak sources.

You're being trolled, guys.

Don't play in to it.

a reply to: introvert

What's that now ?

a reply to: ~Lucidity

No no sorry poor wording. Not YOU you. When anarchists try to overthrow the government, history more often than not tends to call them revolutionaries if they actual seize power, since they cease to be anarchists from that point onward.

Kind Regards

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: introvert

What's that now ?

Thanks for the confirmation.

a reply to: introvert

Heres some more then.

a reply to: neo96

Yeah. Socialist does not necessarily mean feasible or well implemented, that much is true. Bernie or not, I often wonder how US will ever come out of its debt spiral.....

Kind Regards

a reply to: GamleGamle

If I could personally help your father and people like him, I would. If I were guaranteed that any money that was taken from me was going to go directly to people like your father, I would have no problem with that.

I don't think anyone would blink an eye.

But people like your father are not the priority, sadly. Greed also exists on the other side of the coin.

a reply to: GamleGamle

I often wonder how US will ever come out of its debt spiral.....

Never.

Especially the socialists.

They LOVE adding debt. They LOVE adding programs that can't pay for themselves.

Their solution is just to rob from the one percent to pay for the 99%.

Until one day there is no more one percent.

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: introvert

What's that now ?

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Hypocrite

a reply to: neo96

Well two can play at that game:

a reply to: ErrorErrorError

nd yep I am just as guilty of Godwin's Law as most politico's are

No more than anyone else.

Thank you.

a reply to: MystikMushroom

Weimar political parties

en.wikipedia.org...

Wouldn't be so sure about that.

www.britannica.com...

Origins.

Many fascist ideas derived from the reactionary backlash to the progressive revolutions of 1789, 1830, 1848, and 1871 and to the secular liberalism and social radicalism that accompanied these upheavals.

Wings.

Conservative economic programs
There were a few, usually small, fascist movements whose social and economic goals were left or left-centrist.

However, the economic programs of the great majority of fascist movements were extremely conservative, favouring the wealthy far more than the middle class and the working class. Their talk of national “socialism” was quite fraudulent in this respect. Although some workers were duped by it before the fascists came to power, most remained loyal to the traditional antifascist parties of the left.

Encyclopaedia Brittanica.

a reply to: neo96

Well here's what you link said, under "right-wing":

Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (NSDAP) — (National Socialist German Workers' Party or the Nazi Party) It advocated Volksgemeinschaft, a unity of all classes, following the corporatist fascist model.

Here

And when I clicked "fascist" from that page, right off the bat it says:

Fascism /ˈfæʃɪzəm/ is a form of radical authoritarian nationalism[1][2] that came to prominence in early 20th-century Europe. Influenced by national syndicalism, fascism originated in Italy during World War I, in opposition to liberalism, Marxism, and anarchism. Fascism is usually placed on the far-right within the traditional left–right spectrum.[3][4

Then here

So....?

a reply to: introvert

Ah troll is only ever successful when it invokes a non rational emotional response.
To be more precise one is only a troll, when these individuals are actually out to get you into that state
for the sake of their amusement alone.......
This is further complicated by the fact that the perpetrators are only semi aware of this process occurring themselves.
At least is my personal experience.

So only a few things to do. Step away from the conversation..... I failed there. The onus is mine.
Very politely call upon people their better angels.... and de-escalatory sentences like.

We are all in this together.
Or lets agree to disagree and keep it civil.
I can understand where your coming from, I just have a different experience... ect ect

Ignore the suspected trolling attempt....
Or keep on the logical train, stone faced and undeterred for the sake of educational value, hoping for a crack in the facade or for the love of your own internet typing voice.

Not entirely sure where I am standing, but having fun all in all. So no troll worries. I do not fear the end of the world, just because a few people wish to cling to the most static interpretations of socialism....

So that is my view.

Kind Regards and peace be with you.

a reply to: MystikMushroom

Well who knew conservative were 'anticapitalist'.

In July 1919 he was appointed Verbindungsmann (intelligence agent) of an Aufklärungskommando (reconnaissance commando) of the Reichswehr, to influence other soldiers and to infiltrate the German Workers' Party (DAP). While monitoring the activities of the DAP, Hitler became attracted to the founder Anton Drexler's anti-Semitic, nationalist, anti-capitalist, and anti-Marxist ideas.[1]

en.wikipedia.org...

originally posted by: MystikMushroom
a reply to: neo96

Well two can play at that game:

Don't ever let anyone say you don't have a sense of humor.

hahahahahahahaha