NLBS 03.07: Radical Right Wing Terrorism; That's Right, We Said it.

a reply to: SkepticOverlord

Choices for the leader of the United States? nope. None on either side. But then, I don't remember a good one for quite some time. But I guess if one sucks a tiny bit less than the other in your mind, arguing over who sucks less is always a fantastic idea.

a reply to: SkepticOverlord

Jainist?

originally posted by: IAMTAT
If we're playing THAT card, then let's blame 'Radical LEFT Wing Terrorism' for the BLM jihad on assassinating cops.
Fair is Fair.

Yes because deflection is the only way to deal with something that one can't refute. Deflection, obfuscation, insulting,etc. What I thought was going to happen and I wasn't disappointed. What's wrong with owning something?

a reply to: ~Lucidity

No, I mean like: "Pigs In A Blanket...Fry 'Em Like Bacon"...and "What Do We Want?---Dead Cops!---When Do We Want Them?---NOW!"

originally posted by: IAMTAT
If we're playing THAT card, then let's blame 'Radical LEFT Wing Terrorism' for the BLM jihad on assassinating cops.
Fair is Fair.

We're working on it. It's insanely more complicated that we originally thought, and are seeking out experts on the matter. Not to mention that there's some shadiness surrounding the origins of BLM, as an off-shoot from the Ferguson protests.

Aren't "right wingers" basically the ONLY group that is religiously TRYING to keep our freedoms? I used to be far right, but I am in the middle now, but still agree with a lot of what they are about.

They are 99% constitutionalists, so yes, in the Govs eye's, they would be terrorists. In reality, they have the same thoughts as our founders did. They just want to be left alone to enjoy freedom, or what is left of it.


Pcg

a reply to: BuzzyWigs

You did when you 'ask' WHY i need them.

Not anyones place to ask.

Because that is an effort to try to repudiate an unalienable RIGHT.

For a guy who uploads videos entitled "Next Level Bull Sh**"....this video sure is SHOVELING huge amounts.

My God. The slant and MASSIVE amounts of data omitted. Matches some good hack hit pieces I see on Yellow Journalism websites.

Good Gravy.

originally posted by: network dude
Choices for the leader of the United States? nope. None on either side.

I don't know, anyone in the public sector. Who's "good?" I used to nudge McCain toward possibly being "good," but then I moved to Arizona.

a reply to: neo96

You did when you 'ask' WHY i need them.

Not anyones place to ask.

So being curious and trying to get to know you better is an assault on you? Wow.

Because that is an effort to try to repudiate an unalienable RIGHT.

No, it really isn't. It's a question.
You can answer it, or refuse to answer it.

That is your right as a human being.

a reply to: neo96

So what part of you and Buzzy not understand ?

What gives you the right to ask such a question?


I said there is nothing restricting buzzy from asking you a question.

You claim there is. Does that also apply to you?


OMG so many questions. Hope we don't get reported.

a reply to: intrepid

What's wrong with owning something?

Exactly!

There are many things that have happened that the Left has to take responsibility for and I hope my fellow Leftists are willing to take their lumps when the time comes.

originally posted by: pcgamer11
Aren't "right wingers" basically the ONLY group that is religiously TRYING to keep our freedoms?

A self-proclaimed "right wing" group in New York recently sued a local government to get the Minora removed from public property (while preserving the Christmas tree), and won. How is that keeping religious freedom?

a reply to: BuzzyWigs

Answer this then.

Why are you talking ?

Then you will get the answer your seeking on guns.

But I don't go around asking that question because it's a given free speech is a RIGHT.

Now apply it to guns.

But, but but......

How on Earth are they going to stop the immigration from Right Wingers?

The truth is, fundamentalism exists in all parts of society, some choose to use words, some use guns, some use mobile phones to detonate explosives tied to hostages they have taken and will not receive a ransom for.

The media is to blame, they show what they are told to show, pure and simple.

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: BuzzyWigs

You did when you 'ask' WHY i need them.

Not anyones place to ask.

Because that is an effort to try to repudiate an unalienable RIGHT.

She has the right to ask. You don't have to answer that is your right.

There is no law stopping her from asking though.

originally posted by: BatheInTheFountain
My God. The slant and MASSIVE amounts of data omitted...

In your opinion, what aspect of radical right-wing terrorism was omitted?

originally posted by: SkepticOverlord

originally posted by: network dude
Choices for the leader of the United States? nope. None on either side.

I don't know, anyone in the public sector. Who's "good?" I used to nudge McCain toward possibly being "good," but then I moved to Arizona.

In all honesty, I believe we need 8 year term limits on everyone in the government and we need to elect a Joe Nobody who's only political accomplishment is serving in the US military. And be sure he has lived his life as a lower middle class person so he can truly represent the majority of Americans. (He or She)

But that isn't how the game is played. We need to be divided, angry at the other side and arrogantly assume we are correct.

it's the American way.

a reply to: neo96

Answer this then.

Why are you talking ?

Then you will get the answer your seeking on guns.

Because I want to know you better.

I want to understand your thinking, so that perhaps we can come to some kind of common ground.

Anything else?

a reply to: Cobaltic1978

The media is to blame, they show what they are told to show, pure and simple.

People are to blame as well for not being wise enough to realize the media is filling them with propaganda and they should change the channel if they are not mentally strong enough to resist the propaganda.