It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: LSU0408
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Krazysh0t
I he is elected the next potus then god help not only the United States but also the rest of the world.
Seriously... I'm really worried about. I've never felt so worried about a potential Presidential candidate before. Normally when you hear about how a President is destroying the country or whatever it is mostly just sour grapes, but this is different. Trump plans on seriously breaking things and that is a problem.
He's much better than obama, so I would say that you're gonna be safe from harm. Just watch out for someone screaming allaha akbar.
“Maybe he should have been roughed up,” he said. “It was disgusting what he was doing.”
He gave a similarly winking response when his supporters have turned violent in the past. Two men in Boston said they ambushed and brutally beat a homeless Latino man because they were “inspired” by Trump, who later explained his supporters “are very passionate” and “love this country.”
Reports of Trump supporters launching violent and racist attacks have become fairly commonplace. Another recent rally took a dark turn when attendees shoved and spat on on immigration advocates. The following week, Trump supporters were filmed dragging and kicking an immigration activist while others yelled “U-S-A! U-S-A!”
After a slew of these highly publicized incidents, Trump’s campaign began corralling media this week and refused to allow reporters into the crowd at rallies.
“The problem is Trump is — I’m not sure how much of a grasp he has on this fire that he’s playing with,” he said.
McCarthy, who wrote a book last year laying out the case for the impeachment of President Obama for his failure to enforce immigration laws, said the politically acceptable opinion is to stop jihadis from coming to America.
“That’s not the problem,” he said. “The problem is if you let Islamic supremacists in the country, they form Shariah enclaves as they have all throughout Europe. And that is the atmosphere in which radicalization occurs.”
Concerns over applying “religious tests” to immigration are misplaced, McCarthy said.
“The big thing, Laura, is that Islam, strictly speaking, is not merely a religion,” he said. “So everybody’s who’s in an uproar on the basis of thinking this is unconstitutionally applying a religious test to Islam is assuming that Islam is a religion just like other religions that we’re familiar with in the West.”
McCarthy said the first Muslims he met were patriotic, pro-Western Muslims who helped him make the case against the so-called blind sheik, Omar Abdel-Rahman in 1995. They are the Muslims America wants, he said. But he added that many Muslims do not recognize a division between spiritual and political life.
“That is basically antithetical to our Constitution,” he said. “It can’t be that we can’t figure out a way to keep the pro-Western Muslims in and on our side, and keep these Shariah supremacists out.”
“It can’t be that we can’t figure out a way to keep the pro-Western Muslims in and on our side, and keep these Shariah supremacists out.”
originally posted by: LSU0408
Lmao! Most sensibly minded people are going to vote him into office.
As a member of your described demographic, I can agree with some of the things you said, but not for the reasons you stated. Middle aged educated whites see ourselves working tirelessely every day, while getting cut off at the knees constantly by the gov.
The same gov, that treats illegal immigrants better than the same folks paying those tax dollars.
It is seriously a sad but true joke, that many of us middle aged educated whites, could double our standard of living by leaving america, buying fake foreign documentation, and illegally reentering as an illegal immigrant than staying in our current situation.
Is it so hard to see the reason for the frustration?
If you were to start rounding up Muslims tomorrow and putting them in camps - or killing them - there are people that would now rationalize this as being acceptable under the circumstances. Acceptable and necessary
Anyways, as a outsider, i admit, it's funny to Lol at your situation. Just to get him in the white house or it's WW3 for real ( and USA would be the "nazi", that's the problems)
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: LSU0408
Keeping muslims from entering into America is a good way to make sure the rest of the civilized world hates us.
originally posted by: LSU0408
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: LSU0408
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: bjarneorn
No he doesn't have a point. Basically this rhetoric goes. We are so scared of ALL muslims that because we aren't sure which ones are trying to kill us so we are just going to not let any near us. That is some seriously depraved logic there.
The best is the caveat at the end, "Until we can figure out a solution to the problem". What? We are going on our 3rd President since 9/11 and many more since the 70's when this trend of extremist Muslims terrorism started. We aren't going to come up with a reasonable solution to this mess. What will happen (if trump were to actually be successful with this idiotic proposal) is that we'd implement it then a generation or so down the line (or maybe even the next President) we'd repeal it. Hell I wouldn't be surprised if SCOTUS flat out overturned it while he was the President.
It's not just muslims from the ME. Hell, I don't trust anyone outside of America besides Canadians and English speaking Europeans.
Well at least you are consistent in your paranoia.
Paranoia - suspicion and mistrust of people or their actions without evidence or justification.
Sorry but my distrust isn't due to a lack of evidence or justification. It's hardly paranoia.
originally posted by: LSU0408
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: LSU0408
Not really. Being ISIS or doing something in the name of ISIS gets you on a terrorist watch list. You are just hung up that no one wants to call them Muslim terrorists instead of just terrorists.
You're just assuming that's what I want (I believe we're now tied 2-2 in the assumption category). I don't discriminate, I want all terrorism watched within America (IRS targeting towards Conservative organizations during election years doesn't count), and block all outsiders until we fix our own issues. Tashfeen killed in the name of ISIS. 14 people died. Nobody knew she was involved or pledged to ISIS until after the fact. I know it's easier said than done, that's why I'd rather we get that fixed first. Why can't we take care of our own first?
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
reply to post by Krazysh0t
First off, we can't keep unwanted Mexicans out of the country and the racist Trump wants to ban a WHOLE other demographic. Seriously, his rhetoric is getting out of hand. I feel like the Grand Wizard of the KKK is running for President AND somehow being successful. Is this the Twilight Zone...?
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
reply to post by Krazysh0t
What needs to be done is AMERICANS need to stop living in intolerant ignorance of these subjects and actually educate themselves on what is really going on instead of relying on politicians to fix all their problems.