It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
originally posted by: angryhulk
Whichever way you look at it, Turkey should not have shot down that plane.
False. If their version is correct they should have.
Russia, in either version, should have responded to warnings. Russia does not deny the warnings, they don't claim to have responded.
originally posted by: asen_y2k
I am hearing chatter from other sutes that a pic of the pilot DEAD is circulation on twitter. Can anybody confirm?
originally posted by: Rocker2013
originally posted by: Logman
originally posted by: BIGPoJo
So much shilling going on in this thread is disgusting. Its obvious who's side Turkey is on, and anyone that refutes that fact is an ISIS shill.
Nah, it's just ignorance and the results of media brainwashing. Turkey good. Russia bad. Syria bad. ISIS bad. And forget the nuance and complexity.
No, we're just rational people who base our opinions on what we actually know, rather than what Alex Jones screams about in one of his highly profitable videos.
You know, there is a difference between "suspicion" and "fact", right?
originally posted by: Logman
The evidence? That Turkey supports ISIS militarily and financially? That Saudi and Qatari nationals fund ISIS, Al-Qaeda and al-Nusra? That declassified Pentagon reports show that the US was at least aware of what ISIS would do back in 2012 and that the Sunni powers were backing it? It's all well reported in respected media outlets like The Guardian, NYT and a host of others. Just because you are ignorant of why the West and the Gulf nations want to remove Assad doesn't make it a conspiracy theory.
originally posted by: mr-lizard
originally posted by: asen_y2k
I am hearing chatter from other sutes that a pic of the pilot DEAD is circulation on twitter. Can anybody confirm?
Yep there's an alleged video here
twitter.com...
originally posted by: asen_y2k
originally posted by: mr-lizard
originally posted by: asen_y2k
I am hearing chatter from other sutes that a pic of the pilot DEAD is circulation on twitter. Can anybody confirm?
Yep there's an alleged video here
twitter.com...
But we have photos of two parachutes! Both apparantly survived the hit on the plane. Hope he was not executed on the ground.
originally posted by: mr-lizard
a reply to: asen_y2k
That's what I'm wondering.
3 possibilities
a) already killed when they both ejected due to missile fire
b) died on impact with the ground
c) killed by the rebels
originally posted by: schonbret
There is also the french aircraft carrier "Charles de Gaulle" in the area. Two AA frigates are part of its escort: "Chevalier Paul" (French) and "HMS Defender" (UK).
If this event indeed happened in Latikia province, I'm guessing they might have a good idea of the situation.
originally posted by: mr-lizard
a reply to: asen_y2k
That's what I'm wondering.
3 possibilities
a) already killed when they both ejected due to missile fire
b) died on impact with the ground
c) killed by the rebels
originally posted by: angryhulk
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
originally posted by: angryhulk
Whichever way you look at it, Turkey should not have shot down that plane.
False. If their version is correct they should have.
Russia, in either version, should have responded to warnings. Russia does not deny the warnings, they don't claim to have responded.
If they are in Syrian airspace the warnings are what?... "Please remove yourself from our neighbours airspace"... How does that work?
originally posted by: mr-lizard
a reply to: asen_y2k
That's what I'm wondering.
3 possibilities
a) already killed when they both ejected due to missile fire
b) died on impact with the ground
c) killed by the rebels
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
originally posted by: angryhulk
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
originally posted by: angryhulk
Whichever way you look at it, Turkey should not have shot down that plane.
False. If their version is correct they should have.
Russia, in either version, should have responded to warnings. Russia does not deny the warnings, they don't claim to have responded.
If they are in Syrian airspace the warnings are what?... "Please remove yourself from our neighbours airspace"... How does that work?
Read again. I said if the Turkish version (in Turkish airspace) is correct.
Russia, in either version, should have responded to warnings.