Apparent massive triangular object captured over Melbourne - night vision video

a reply to: Phage

Oh, right. Yes, I'll agree with that. Though I take it you aren't averse to the idea that there are other dimensions that we can't properly comprehend?

a reply to: markymint

The video uploader claims the camera is protected from lens flares and the like by a protective cardboard cylinder that gets rid of ground-level light sources. I'd say it's more likely to be faked than a lens flair, honestly, but a lens flair is still a possibility.
The video is time-lapsed.
I'll agree with you on the ridiculous click bait title, though. "Mega-structure," as if. It's impossible to scale the thing.

a reply to: Mclaneinc

There is movement on max quality 1920x1080 full screen. Have you watched it on that? One of us is having our eyes play tricks on us, if that's the case.
The level of twinkling is something I can imagine being faked, though, with something like a blur effect.
The recording at the end of the video is from another time, with another camera.

a reply to: Ectoplasm8

Starred for evidence. That's definitely intriguing, and while the images don't match up perfectly hoaxing has now shot up on the list of explanations.

a reply to: Eilasvaleleyn

Though I take it you aren't averse to the idea that there are other dimensions that we can't properly comprehend?

As mathematical constructs (as in string "theory") sure. With math there is really no limit to the number of dimensions. Does that mean they exist? No.

Could one leave one dimension and enter another? Which dimension are we in right now? Length, width, or depth? Which one would you like to enter?

a reply to: Phage

I wasn't suggesting they exist. I don't really think "interdimensional" is the explanation here. Theoretically, I believe that if there are more than the dimensions we are aware of then we exist inside them but are not capable of expressing or... Well, being aware of them. It's just something in a different direction than what is currently there, like adding the K axis to an I, J graph.

a reply to: Timely

As distance is relative, could this be swarming bats or birds ?

I'm sorry, do stationary, triangularly formationed, hovering bats evaporate? Just wondering.

a reply to: Eilasvaleleyn

like adding the K axis to an I, J graph.

or when licking a chicken on both the outside and inside, at once.

a reply to: Phage

Which dimension are we in right now? Length, width, or depth? Which one would you like to enter?

There's no need to pick, we occupy every dimension simultaneously. We chose to participate in this one, for now.

a reply to: donktheclown

Not quite. But that analogy does illustrate the point of how incomprehensible any extra dimensions that may exist actually are to us.

a reply to: draknoir2

What is seen is the byproduct of the discharge of the generator. The effect is called sonoluminescence. The growing number of threads here about strange flashes in the sky are mostly the result of this effect from the triangles. It is the key to finding and recognition of objects using this technology. People had better start getting on board about this as the stuff is being used against the people in bolder and more intrusive ways. I speak from years of continuous direct experience. I have probably had at least 500 triangle sightings in less than 2 years. Along with other unsavory craft of various sizes using ultrasound as propulsion and multiple types of cloaking. I didn't want to accept that but it has not been my choice. Most folks would rather keep their heads in the sand than see what's right in front of them. The implications are terrifying

originally posted by: speedofdarkness
a reply to: draknoir2

What is seen is the byproduct of the discharge of the generator. The effect is called sonoluminescence. The growing number of threads here about strange flashes in the sky are mostly the result of this effect from the triangles. It is the key to finding and recognition of objects using this technology. People had better start getting on board about this as the stuff is being used against the people in bolder and more intrusive ways. I speak from years of continuous direct experience. I have probably had at least 500 triangle sightings in less than 2 years. Along with other unsavory craft of various sizes using ultrasound as propulsion and multiple types of cloaking. I didn't want to accept that but it has not been my choice. Most folks would rather keep their heads in the sand than see what's right in front of them. The implications are terrifying

I believe everything you just said without question.

hey this can be fun what's everybodies favorite propulsion theory for these triangles.

so far we got a member throwing ultrasound and sonoluminescence.

anybody got any other ideas? maybe we can all brainstorm and come up with some possibilities for the propulsion mechanism.

resonant microwaves n metamaterials?

crazy capacitors that unfurl the a potential field robbing the vacuume of energy thus creating negative mass or reduction?

intensly spinning magnetic fields to bind up the light break semetry and mess with inertia?

magnetic fields pulling ionized atmosphere around the craft as a mhd propulsion?

are we seeing sonoluminescence from ultrasound?

are we seeing bremsstrahlung from crazy magnetic fields?

are we seeing chenkorev from some strange slowing of light in a superconductor creating an optical boom? (like a sonic boom)

I dunno what say ats? anyone willing to speculate?

a reply to: Eilasvaleleyn

Not quite.

No, exactly. Think about it. A fourth dimension where I was able to perceive, from one vantage point, your physical appearance from the front and back, simultaneously. What about being able to hear both really loud and whisper soft sound, at the same time?

originally posted by: BASSPLYR
hey this can be fun what's everybodies favorite propulsion theory for these triangles.

so far we got a member throwing ultrasound and sonoluminescence.

anybody got any other ideas? maybe we can all brainstorm and come up with some possibilities for the propulsion mechanism.

resonant microwaves n metamaterials?

crazy capacitors that unfurl the a potential field robbing the vacuume of energy thus creating negative mass or reduction?

intensly spinning magnetic fields to bind up the light break semetry and mess with inertia?

magnetic fields pulling ionized atmosphere around the craft as a mhd propulsion?

are we seeing sonoluminescence from ultrasound?

are we seeing bremsstrahlung from crazy magnetic fields?

are we seeing chenkorev from some strange slowing of light in a superconductor creating an optical boom? (like a sonic boom)

I dunno what say ats? anyone willing to speculate?

Unicorns?


Santa's reindeer?

Methane gas deposits from Uranus traveling through a local wormhole into our atmosphere?

a reply to: draknoir2

I believe everything you just said without question.

a reply to: donktheclown

The reason I said "Not quite" is because it is possible to lick a chicken on both the inside and outside at once using only our three dimensions. You just need a relatively long and flexible tongue, and a large enough hole in the chicken.

a reply to: Eilasvaleleyn

Because our limited understanding of physics and the nature of reality. With the proper means of propulsion, there is no need for aerodynamic designs. They're simply unnecessary.

I understand your confusion. We are not meant to look beyond our limited sphere of influence. We're designed to deny that which is difficult to comprehend. Easier to manipulate.

a reply to: Gh0stwalker

No, but you're making the assumption that they would be discarded simply because they were not necessary. Having long hair is not necessary, but I choose to have it as an aesthetic choice.

I'm not confused, I just think you're wrong. "Aliens would not need aerodynamic designs" does not translate into "Aliens do not have aerodynamic designs."

a reply to: Zaphod58

I'd hear something go over and would run out to the porch to look.

Do it all the time.

It does make others in the house look at you funny, but I do it anyways.

a reply to: Eilasvaleleyn

You just need a relatively long and flexible tongue, and a large enough hole in the chicken.

Haha, I meant a live chicken......

a reply to: Mclaneinc

THANK YOU!!!

a reply to: Eilasvaleleyn

My sources say otherwise.

But the point is, only we humans rely solely on aerodynamic designs.